The British General Election of 1950

It's good to remember just how bizarre both the 1950 and 1951 elections were OTL. Despite polling more than one and a half million more votes than the Conservatives and their allies, and receiving more votes than they had in 1945, Labour only got a majority of five seats. In 1951 the Conservatives won a majority of 16 despite winning over 200,000 less votes than Labour, and with Labour winning the most votes that they have ever won, or indeed that any party had ever won until 1992.

Because Labour piled up the votes in safe seats, they had high 80's turnout in the Coalfield seats where they were getting 70%+ of the vote, this was because Labour had delivered in those seats. They struggled in the suburbs, where rationing, high taxes and austerity didn't go down so well.

1951 was particularly perverse, one wonders what the twatters would have thought of it.

That's right, the one election that Winston Churchill ever won against Attlee, he still won while losing the popular vote. In that sense I think it really wouldn't have taken much for 1950, and hence the rest of the 1950s in Britain, to have gone differently.

That's why I chose the POD, just a small Con-Lib swing and things change.
 

John Farson

Banned
And the fact that it's John Major who holds that particular record as a party leader is slightly bizarre in itself!

And yet, rather than manifesting itself in a landslide number of seats, the Conservatives lost 40 seats, making it easier for Blair to win his landslide five years later.

That's first-past-the-post for you.
 
Because Labour piled up the votes in safe seats, they had high 80's turnout in the Coalfield seats where they were getting 70%+ of the vote, this was because Labour had delivered in those seats. They struggled in the suburbs, where rationing, high taxes and austerity didn't go down so well.

1951 was particularly perverse, one wonders what the twatters would have thought of it.



That's why I chose the POD, just a small Con-Lib swing and things change.
Judging from this year's seemingly more logical result's reaction - that would be interesting.
I still find it slightly odd how low-key the reaction seems to have been (especially given the outrage over South Africa's similar result a few years prior) - I mean, it seems like even the ERS took a few years to notice....
 
It is actually what happened, the only AH in there is the results. Two of which are rather significant.

Aha - interesting stuff. You know what they say, it's a compliment if your AH is indistinguishable from the real bits (something Thande and EdT do very well too).

And yes, Enoch and Edward have hit a bump in the road. I doubt it'll be all plain sailing down the rivers of blood for them both (BECAUSE ONE HAD A YACHT AND THE OTHER WAS A RACIALIST, YOU SEE).
 

Sideways

Donor
Interesting section - I was watching the 1945 British Council film on how the election workes t'other day. It's worth seeing, if only because they follow the campaign in Profumo's constituency. It made me wonder about the encroachment of television into the election experience. I meant to learn more, but then I got distracted by something shiny.

It's a nice angle for a TL to discuss. Thanks for this.
 
I'm interested in seeing how Attlee continues ruling. I remember ruling Labour had been running out of ideas/steams in 1951 due to having literally implemented almost everything in their agenda.
 
2. The Rest of the Results

The majority of seats declared on the Friday, up and down the country, teams of people assembled in Town Halls to spend the morning counting. There was little media coverage, there was no special programme on the Home Service and the Television remained off-air until lunchtime when the nearly finalised result of the election was covered on the One O'Clock News. The evening newspapers were the best source of results, although most of them covered their local cities in their first edition.

There were a few hopes in Conservative Central Office that there might be some form of miracle on the Friday and that the suburbs and the market towns which had voted Labour in 1945 might swing strongly back to the Conservatives and save the day. No-one had done more than very rough estimates on the new seats, the days of carefully calculated predictions would have to wait for the 1976 election, although there were "calls" by experienced agents.

Also Labour were undoubtedly losing seats, the boundary changes had probably removed 30 seats from them and Labour MP's were often standing in hopeless successor seats which were frequently misreported by local newspapers as a Conservative gain.

However, the overnight pattern lay against them, Labour had held on to every seat in London, in Birmingham they had 9 out of 13 despite their hopes for the Yardley, Northfield and Erdington divisions. In Glasgow, Labour won the Govan and Scotstoun divisions against the odds, giving them 10 out of the 15 seats in the Second City of the Empire. Only two of the great cities produced a majority of seats for the Conservatives - Edinburgh which returned 4 out of 7 and Liverpool which returned 5 out of 9 despite a strong campaign in Liverpool, Kirkdale.

However, the suburbs and the market towns did not yield the results that the Conservatives had hoped for, Spelthorne was retained by Labour, then Bedford and Peterborough. However, the real shocks were to come from the West Country, whilst the great 1945 surprise of Taunton was regained by the Conservatives due to the addition of a large block of hunting country, it was only by 470 votes on a 91% turnout. The agents of both parties had been predicting a 3,000 Conservative lead. But Taunton wasn't that indicative, North Somerset (a greatly changed Frome) was held by Labour where a 5,000 Conservative majority had been the estimate; Exeter fell to the Labour party despite its controversial candidate, but the most unexpected result of all was from Devizes which was narrowly carried by Labour.

Nor were these results because the West Country Liberal vote had collapsed, it had not in most seats, the Liberals had held North Dorset and despite the defection of their MP to Labour held the new North Cornwall as well. They added to their pleasure by gaining the new Torrington division with the young Mark Bonham-Carter who along with the new MP for Orkney and Zetland Jo Grimond - became one of the few distinctive Liberal voices in the parliament. In fact the Liberal vote had held up well throughout the UK, it was noticeable even on the day that in the two party contests between the Conservatives and Labour that the Conservatives were getting their better results.

By noon, it was clear that Mr Attlee had been comfortably returned to office, the high turnout meant that the counts took a little longer than previously but the majority result was reached with Sowerby just before the 1 O'Clock News. The final seat to declare was Basingstoke just after 5pm, where Labour scored an unexpected victory after 2 recounts by 25 votes on a lower than average turnout.

Labour 13,072,957 votes 45.6% 336 seats
Conservative* 11,423,843 votes 39.85% 272 seats
Liberal 3,977,195 votes 13,87% 14 seats
Communist 91,180 no seats
Others 100,554 votes 3 seats

* Includes Ulster Unionist for seat count only.
 
Good to see a little mention of Tom Horabin as having won Exeter there. Also, I'm pleased about Bonham-Carter winning. I've often thought of having him win in '51 or '55 just so he could be a "hipster" choice for Liberal leader in some of my TLs.

Great stuff :)
 
Oh, excellent! This is like Christmas dinner, only for my brain (and without the paralytic overeating).

A Labour MP in darkest Wiltshire? That's going to be a fun five years. I'd love to see W. E. Cave keep his seat in four years' time (if we go that far...).

If you'll excuse the entirely predictable bout of civic chauvinism, I'd guess the Liverpool seats turned out as OTL (based on a quick trawl through the relevant Wiki pages)?

Thanks again Iain, this is proving a real treat.
 
Fascinating as always. One minor quibble, was there a TV One'o'clock news in the fifties? I only watched children's TV then, and that was quite a bit later, but I thought there were no daytime transmissions, with programmes starting about four or five with Children's Hour?
 
1976 CGI? WTF!

...and simple computer-generated graphics first enthralled the nation at the 1976 election...

No chance, unless there's been a planet-sized POD in computing. IOTL "computer graphics" simply did not exist in 1970's UK TV. Images were created by cutting out colored card, or by exposing film to colors, or by the use of acrylic paint. Making them move was done by physically moving them or the camera. Compositing was done by color separation overlay/chromakey, which does not need a computer and did not at the time used them. Unless you're thinking of moving the whole planetary computing industry forward ten years, you will not have computer graphics in 1976 UK TV, simple or otherwise.

Techniques:

IOTL examples
The faux-computer graphics here are actually still images animated by hand or mechanically
 
Top