[REDUX] West of the Rhine - What If Germany Lost the Rhineland?

Prologue: The Winds of Change
Greetings.

First of all, I'd like to apologize for the sheer time it took to finally continue working on this. I had severe writer's block after my last post coupled with life getting in the way made me effectively abandon it for the time being, But I'm back, and hopefully it doesn't take nearly a year to post new chapters, although still expect some waiting between them.

But now that I have returned...


Alexander Field presents,
with help from Slender and the ATTP
west_of_the_rhine__shadow_of_the_great_war_by_alexfield290_dg3vhq0.png

What if Germany lost the Rhineland in 1919?

Prologue: The Winds of Change
“How harsh is too harsh?”

That has been the question asked since the Punic Wars of old, when the Romans had a bit too much fun in pushing down their enemies and only resulted in a future resurgence of hatred. So infamous, it coined the term “Carthaginian peace” to refer to such ‘deals’ intended to cripple the losing side involved rather than reconcile; even in fiction, this trope is common enough to become a cliché. Yet in spite of this, humanity still refuses to learn of their past mistakes, thinking that doing the same thing over and over will magically make it work, to the point where it’d be easier to list peace deals that weren’t this.

But the one we are focusing on for now is the Treaty of Versailles, signed to end Germany’s involvement in the Great War. Without going into too much detail, a combination of alliances, political tensions, and the assassination of the Austrian heir led to a war so destructive, its death toll of up to 40,000,000 makes the Thirty Years’ War count of 12,000,000 look like a complete joke by comparison. Now while the war was started by Austria-Hungary, the true pariah that came out of it was the German Empire, now the German Republic after the abdication of the Emperor (Kaiser) in the last days of the war; outside of Russia (which collapsed into civil war between ‘Whites’ and communists/’Reds’), they had mobilised the most out of anyone with 12,000,000 men.

Germany also had the self-created misfortune of being hated by just about everyone who wasn’t their allies in the war, or the Netherlands. France in particular had an irrational level of hatred for them… after they took a chunk of land from them in 1871 (because human beings will always find the pettiest reasons to hate on other human beings); oh, and because the Germans wanted Morocco to remain an independent state rather than a French-Spanish protectorate. Combined with the horrific actions of the Deutsches Heer such as the Raping of Belgium, only the Ottomans with their genocide of minorities managed to be equal with them in terms of the sheer hatred they received.

Much of the treaty was easy to decide; of course Germany was required to greatly disarm itself, of course Germany was not keeping its overseas holdings, and of course they would be paying dearly… 132 billion gold marks, to be exact. But, outside of Alsace-Lorraine, the mainland territory was the subject of debate. In particular, France was heavily pushing for the Rhineland to be split apart from the nation; the Rhineland for those unaware is a region in the west that makes up a significant chunk of the German industry, and included among that was the wartime industry. France made the rather damning argument that allowing Germany to keep it could potentially lead to remilitarization in the future. The rest of the powers eventually agreed, but then came the next part.

How the Rhineland should be governed became a great debate within the treaty. You see, France’s idea was to just annex wholesale and govern it as their own department (or, more accurately, how they governed Algeria as a ‘department’), however this was quickly shot down for multiple reasons. The first problem was that the Rhine was home to about 10 million people, equivalent to a tenth of the German population, while France had about 41 million, so simply annexing the territory would grow them by nearly 20% and force a redistribution of supplies from the French citizens to the new German populace, as well as a ton of sudden new voters to complicate the already divided government.

The second problem was that, should Germany ever become aggressive again and attain an actually strong military, defending the Rhine would be difficult. While it does run across the Rhine river, most of the actual Rhineland is either flat plains (north), or small mountains that rarely exceed one kilometre in height. And there were fears that France would use the newly acquired wartime industry to completely destroy any sense of power balance… so, basically, they didn’t want France to dominate the continent a la Napoleon.

The next idea was the Interallied Commissionary Council, which would see all major Entente powers occupy ‘regions’ separately, eternally, however this was also shot down for a few reasons. Firstly, occupation is expensive, which means less money, which means economic downturn. Secondly, Italy, Japan, and the United States weren’t interested in occupying German lands at all, especially the former two who had only briefly confronted them and were more interested about their direct gains, which means that only Britain and France would be the ones occupying the region when they needed to focus on other issues.

As a result, after weeks of debate, they came up with this:
Article 42:
The area West of the Rhine and 50 kilometres to the East of the Rhine, including the Ruhr will be split off from Germany and become an independent democratic republic called the Rhenish Republic, under French suzerainty with occupation of all major cities. Germany is forbidden to maintain or construct any fortifications in the area specified.

Article 43:
In the area defined above the maintenance and the assembly of armed forces, either permanently or temporarily, and military manoeuvres of any kind, as well as the upkeep of all permanent works for mobilisation, are in the same way forbidden.

Article 44:
Under no circumstances are Germany nor the Rhenish Republic to engage in any actions that compromise the sovereignty of either, else it will be seen as a hostile act against the Powers signatory of the present Treaty and as calculated to disturb the peace of the world.”

…in simpler terms, the Rhineland would be split off from Germany under French influence, and that it would never be allowed to reunite with them under any circumstances. This approach too had its critics, mainly from the U.S. who felt any division of Germany would lead to bad things down the line, but the rest either didn’t object or felt it was the best option. So, on 28 June 1919, at the Palace of Versailles in France, Hermann Mueller and Johannes Bell formally ratified the Treaty of Versailles to a crowd of foreign Allied diplomats. People at the scene of the signing noted that both appeared to be emotionless and stoic.

Now you may have noticed I haven’t talked about the other members of the Central Powers, and that’s because, to put it bluntly, they really don’t do much stuff internationally from then on until the 40s; Austria, Hungary, and the Ottomans arguably got it much worse in terms of territory lost, but after that, they kinda just sat still for the next few decades. The exception is the Ottomans, which had a revolution and successfully got a better peace treaty, while at the same time also being allowed to pretend as if their genocides of the Armenians, Greeks, and Assyrians just never happened… and people say that Turkey is a great place to live.

Note: The main artwork above was created towards the beginning of writing. As a result, it contains elements no longer present, however I feel it would be a waste to simply have it go unused. As a result, please ignore Slovakia and Japan on the right of the image.
 
Last edited:
The first problem was that the Rhine was home to about 7 million people, equivalent to a tenth of the German population, while France had about 38 million, so simply annexing the territory would grow them by nearly 20% and force a redistribution of supplies from the French citizens to the new German populace, as well as a ton of sudden new voters to complicate the already divided government.
To clarify, 7 million people was the population of the Rheinprovinz. Your Rhineland state is significantly bigger than that, 10-15 million people depending on how far south that 50km strip extends.
 

raharris1973

Gone Fishin'
I very much look forward to seeing what you do with this, and seeing it all played out, in near, medium, and long term!

Attempting to enforce a separate Rhenish state will be a huge political mess, of highly contested, probably violently contested legitimacy, more difficult, almost certainly doomed, and probably shorter-lived, than the 40-45 year-ish existence of the GDR, aka East Germany.

If you've done a previous version, it has unfortunately, completely escaped my notice.

Now for a brief editorialization/ranting portion, in response to the prologue.

The logic articulated in the prologue begins with classical interwar era "oldthink" on Versailles, first-generation revisionism, and the foundational mental permission structure for interwar appeasement, early and late.

Germany also had the self-created misfortune of being hated by just about everyone who wasn’t their allies in the war, or the Netherlands. France in particular had an irrational level of hatred for them… after they took a chunk of land from them in 1871 (because human beings will always find the pettiest reasons to hate on other human beings); oh, and because the Germans wanted Morocco to remain an independent state rather than a French-Spanish protectorate. Combined with the horrific actions of the Deutsches Heer such as the Raping of Belgium, only the Ottomans with their genocide of minorities managed to be equal with them in terms of the sheer hatred they received.

Much of the treaty was easy to decide; of course Germany was required to greatly disarm itself, of course Germany was not keeping its overseas holdings, and of course they would be paying dearly… 132 billion gold marks, to be exact. But, outside of Alsace-Lorraine, the mainland territory was the subject of debate. In particular, France was heavily pushing for the Rhineland to be split apart from the nation; the Rhineland for those unaware is a region in the west that makes up a significant chunk of the German industry, and included among that was the wartime industry. France made the rather damning argument that allowing Germany to keep it could potentially lead to remilitarization in the future. The rest of the powers eventually agreed, but then came the next part.

How the Rhineland should be governed became a great debate within the treaty. You see, France’s idea was to just annex wholesale and govern it as their own department (or, more accurately, how they governed Algeria as a ‘department’), however this was quickly shot down for multiple reasons. The first problem was that the Rhine was home to about 7 million people, equivalent to a tenth of the German population, while France had about 38 million, so simply annexing the territory would grow them by nearly 20% and force a redistribution of supplies from the French citizens to the new German populace, as well as a ton of sudden new voters to complicate the already divided government.

The second problem was that, should Germany ever become aggressive again and attain an actually strong military, defending the Rhine would be difficult. While it does run across the Rhine river, most of the actual Rhineland is either flat plains (north), or small mountains that rarely exceed one kilometre in height. And there were fears that France would use the newly acquired wartime industry to completely destroy any sense of power balance… so, basically, they didn’t want France to dominate the continent a la Napoleon.
The tone used of paragraphs 4 and 7 used is remarkably unsympathetic, and even unempathetic, to a French point of view and any legitimate French interest in its own well-being and safety. It verges on taking an essentialist anti-French point of view, in paragraph 4, lightly throwing in the adjective "irrational" to describe the French level of hatred for Germany, and labeling anger over the 1871 territorial losses among the "pettiest" of reasons of anger. Though, to be fair, although the author "dunks" on the French in using this example he is not truly discriminating only against the French because he says they are just providing one example of what "human beings" in general do. So, he appreciates the French are human beings. Which is, as ex-con and lifestyle expert Martha Stewart says, "a good thing".

The most unfriendly or anti-French lines though came in the bolded parts of paragraph 7. With the contradictory worries enclosed in the paragraph about France being too weak to defend its position on the one hand, or too strong, and thus upsetting the European "balance" in an inherently bad way, somehow becoming another coming of Napoleon (the 1st I presume, though neither of the two were exemplars of international probity or caution), --just what is the author expecting France to do, how can France do its Frenching right? No right way to be French in Europe is offered.

I would also add the elocution of the prologue is a very upper-class English-sounding which is suggestive of a national rivalry with France, although, to be perfectly fair, American policy toward France in the interwar era and WWII, was equally as bad as Britain's, and then some more, even worse, clear through FDR's time. And America took longer to start correcting its policy towards France. Britain at least honorably sacrificed its men and machines trying to stop the second German onslaught in 1940, while America did neither, and only came to help much later, after years of occupation. So, I guess, these paragraphs would not have sounded any bettah to French ears in good ole 'Murican English either.

My view of the interwar era and Versailles and beyond is different from that which seems implied in the prologue. The real stab in the back related to WWI was not the German army and nation getting stabbed in the back its domestic Jews, Socialists and Communists. If there was a stab in the back related to WWI, it was a stab to France's back, and Britain and the USA were holding the knives. And the way they were doing it was by getting France to back down on things like Rhenish separatism, in exchange for promises of trilateral alliance, and then not delivering on trilateral or even bilateral alliances. Then this wound to France was compounded, or salted, or lemon-juiced by the American combination of resistance to enforcement of reparations collection measures (like the Ruhr occupation), combined with insistence on collection of war debts in full, and British resistance to enforcement of reparations collection measures (like the Ruhr occupation). And then made worse by British open signaling that the territorial status quo east of Germany was "negotiable" and not something that the powers and League of Nations stood resolutely opposed to changing by force. This was made absolutely clear by Austen Chamberlain's exclusion of the Germany's eastern borders and its eastern neighbor's borders, from the Locarno Pact of 1925, guaranteeing the borders of Western Europe. Of course, American unilateral isolation from European security affairs was even worse than this. While cheaping out on its own ground forces, and depending on the French Army for European security against Germany in the worst-case [but can't let the French get too strong, got to keep them in the goldilocks zone of "just right"], and using known French nervousness about what they considered vital British support [a nervousness cultivated by the breach over the Ruhr affair] to get France to *back off* from its commitments to Central European allies and Balkan allies and its national interests in the neighboring Spanish Republic, Britain weakened French resolve and strengthened the German position in Europe against France, Poland, the Soviet Union, and Britain herself. It seems Europe and the world's master balance of power calculator calculated the balance a bit incorrectly. And the American Eagle, knowingly or not, wasn't even being that sophisticated, it was playing ostrich, in terms of its behaviors, until past the point of effective deterrence.
 
Last edited:
To clarify, 7 million people was the population of the Rheinprovinz. Your Rhineland state is significantly bigger than that, 10-15 million people depending on how far south that 50km strip extends.
Thanks for clarification. I'll edit that soon.
If you've done a previous version, it has unfortunately, completely escaped my notice.
Indeed, the "old version" before my initial burnout I intended to go back to, but decided to start over from scratch as I think in general it painted France in a bit too of an unsympathetic light.
 
Chapter 1: An Pax Sollicitus
Chapter 1: An Pax Sollicitus
The signing of Versailles was met with widespread approval in France, except from more left-wing groups deemed it unnecessarily harsh, although their thoughts fell practically on deaf ears as more were glad that the war was over. However the nation whose population was universally pissed at the news was, unsurprisingly, Germany itself, and not just because of the fact it was being split off. For the entire war, the state had talked all about the wonderful achievements they had made… even when they were, erm, on the less successful side of the fight that just took place; and only now did the true extent of their failings come to light.

But that wasn’t even the most sore part; what really stung like a bee was the clause that anyone who had lived in the Rhineland region before June 28, 1919, would have their German citizenship stripped away as if they were never citizens to begin with, a clause that even people who wanted an independent Rhenish state didn’t support as they undoubtedly had family living in Berlin, Frankfurt, et al. Anyways, the Rhenish Provisional Government was established during this time with Bertram Kaskert as Chancellor, who had previously been a senior Cologne pastor.

This also more-or-less ruined the legitimacy the new German government had to its citizens. To them, any ‘competent’ government would have pushed for a more ‘reasonable’ treaty, rather than, in their eyes, blindly accept it without question. Of course, in reality, the republic didn’t have any choice besides restarting the war and getting an even worse treaty, but even valid complaints like that do not mean anything to an angry mob. But even in the streets of the victorious nations, not everyone was celebrating; some were doing quite the opposite.

“Shall we call a meeting?”

A few weeks after the signing, the French Section of Workers’ International (SFIO) held a meeting to discuss the treaty which, in their eyes, was one of the worst things ever written. While any transcripts for the meeting have been lost to time, the leader is often quoted as saying (translated) “What happened to the Congress of Vienna? To peace deals where even the defeated side got to help? We’re going all the way back to Carthage with ridiculousness!” although this has never been confirmed and in fact it has been quoted by other politicians, even Russians. Still, even if it wasn’t said, it ended up being the SFIO’s last meeting before the split, with many going ahead and creating the French Communist Party (PCF) and the SFIO being reduced to nothing more than a minor party.

Other victors of the Great War also felt cheated out of. Germany's colonies were divided between Britain, France, Portugal, Japan, and even Belgium as “mandates” for a new organisation, while Italy got… absolutely nothing in the slightest. Italy’s colonial empire in general was rather pathetic, only having control of Libya (practically all a desert), Eritrea, and Somaliland, so the fact they didn’t get anything while the four largest empires got something rubbed them a very bad way. Even on the mainland, they had requested control of Albania, South Tyrol, and all of Istria and Dalmatia, but by the end, they had only gotten Tyrol and Istria. The rest went to the new state of Yugoslavia, while Albania remained separate.

Japan was a bit better, receiving control of the German Pacific, however that didn’t change their international stance of being the least great power not because of their industrial and military capabilities, but instead because they were Asian, while the rest were white. Japan proposed a law for the League that would make the immigration policies of Australia and others illegal, and while no nation directly objected to it, so many abstained that it was dropped anyways. Combined with a naval agreement that gave Japan 3 battleships per 5 British battleships, it was proof that no matter how much Japan did, the West would never give them any respect without spitting on them first.

The Rhenish Republic officially got split off on January 10, 1920, the same day the rest of Versailles went into effect. The same day, the League of Nations, meant to, in Wilson’s eyes, ‘foster world peace and international cooperation’, even though, ironically, the United States would never end up joining thanks to the stubborn old donkey refusing to compromise on a particular clause of the League. Unusually, India was allowed to represent itself with a seat, despite being a British holding. Argentina ended up withdrawing rather quickly after the rest rejected a resolution that all sovereign states should be admitted to it.

Austria and Bulgaria would join the League by December 1920, Germany… didn’t. Before the treaty was even signed, Germany made it clear their interest in joining the League. On 9 May, they sent out to Mr. Clemenceau their intentions, and on 16 June they received the notice that nobody would permanently be blocked from entry, but that they would have to pass a “definite test.” Said test basically accounted for “do anything funny, and we will not let you in.” Seems reasonable enough, if a bit hypocritical given Austria and Bulgaria’s early entry, however in truth, France simply didn’t want Germany to join at all and had put this out to put them into a wild goose chase of ‘bettering’ themselves.

In general, France’s foreign policy going forward was to carefully isolate Germany’s position in the world (ironic, as Otto von Bismarck did the same thing to France). The first and easiest part of this was to give them no international standing, thus blocking them from the League of Nations (and the Olympics). The second part was to make an alliance with a new state in town, Poland. Poland was in actuality a German ally during the Great War, the first time they existed since the Duchy of Warsaw from the times of Napoleon, however in spite of this, a combination of the Greater Polish Uprising and their fight against the Soviets would win them the Entente’s favour. They ended up getting the Polish-majority region of Prussia, and even the definitely German-majority city of Danzig as a LoN mandate, hence why the borders Germany had in this period were very, very strange.

But Germany never accepted the Polish borders as legitimate, so to France, this was an opportunity to strike up an alliance with the new nation. Poland additionally had this not unfounded fear that the Soviets after their embarrassing loss would attempt in the future to reclaim them (Poland was a part of Russia until 1915). To Poland, an alliance would ensure that neither would do anything funny. The Franco-Polish Alliance was signed on 19 February 1921, but didn’t go into effect until 2 August 1923 when the economic pact was ratified. Another alliance between Czechoslovakia, Romania, and Yugoslavia was also signed in 1921 to prevent future Austrian or Hungarian aggression.

This also proved to create enemies with… Lithuania. Lithuania was also previously a Central Powers ally before breaking free, only to then need to fight against the Soviets and the Poles for their independence. They succeeded in that, however their historical capital of Vilnius ended up in Polish hands who formed a temporary puppet state in Inner Lithuania, before annexing them in a most definitely rigged vote in mid-1922. The League of Nations decided to recognize Poland’s rule, while Lithuania and, ironically, the Soviets, decided to support Lithuania’s claims. Germany would at first remain neutral in relation to the dispute, but would in time recognize Lithuania’s claim in the 30s. Erm, at least they got Memel from Germany?

Now let’s zoom out and look at the rest of Europe.
1922.png

(map dated 1 January 1922; Turkey was still at war with Britain and Greece)
 
Last edited:
So, where exactly is the Rhineland-Germany border? From the map it looks most like the eastern border of OTL's occupation zone, plus Hamm, minus Frankfurt-Darmstadt. Is this correct?

For comparison, 50km east of the Rhine is the OTL DMZ border, i.e. the dotted red border in this map:

Occupation_of_the_Rhineland.png
 
Another couple questions:
  • What currency does the Rhineland state use?
  • What's its economical status? Is it a de facto French colony, or economically still a part of Germany, or something in between?
  • Do I read the map correctly in that there's no Saar mandate, the Saar is simply part of the Rhineland state?
  • Do the French still use colonial troops in the occupation?
  • Does the Kapp coup attempt happen on schedule? If yes, does the Red Ruhr Army uprising happen, and does it spread across the German-Rhineland border?
  • EDIT: What's the Rhineland's political system like?
  • EDIT: What do Weimar politics look like? Even more unstable than IOTL I'd imagine, what with losing the Rhineland Catholics – IOTL the single most centrist and compromise-inclined voter bloc in the Weimar system?
 
Last edited:
Another couple questions:
  • What currency does the Rhineland state use?
  • What's its economical status? Is it a de facto French colony, or economically still a part of Germany, or something in between?
  • Do I read the map correctly in that there's no Saar mandate, the Saar is simply part of the Rhineland state?
  • Do the French still use colonial troops in the occupation?
  • Does the Kapp coup attempt happen on schedule? If yes, does the Red Ruhr Army uprising happen, and does it spread across the German-Rhineland border?
  • EDIT: What's the Rhineland's political system like?
  • EDIT: What do Weimar politics look like? Even more unstable than IOTL I'd imagine, what with losing the Rhineland Catholics – IOTL the single most centrist and compromise-inclined voter bloc in the Weimar system?
In order:
  • Rhenish franc (think OTL's Saar franc)
  • Somewhere in between
  • No Saar mandate, it's part of the Rhine
  • No
  • Yes and no (even if it does still occur, it wouldn't cross the border)
  • Rhineland's political system is not that far off of the French Third Republic; a parliamentary republic where the President is merely ceremonial and the Chancellor is executive
  • Indeed. Not to spoil much, but by the 1932 election the SPD ends up forming a coalition with... the KPD, since the alternative are nationalist/monarchist parties
 
In order:
  • Rhenish franc (think OTL's Saar franc)
Ok, so currency union with France.
  • Somewhere in between
I guess why I'm asking is, can the Weimar state do something like OTL's Ruhrkampf financing early? Though if the Rhineland is in a currency union with France, it probably can't. Which, ironically, might be a boon for the Weimar state in that the 1923 hyperinflation might not happen.
Alright. So, no German attempts to use the presence of Senegalese troops as a wedge issue to turn Anglo feminists against France. Though even then I'm a bit surprised that Germany still signs the treaty – even IOTL the French position was a bluff, Germany signed the treaty because they believed that the UK and US would be willing to use their navies to starve Germany into submission when they actually weren't.
  • Rhineland's political system is not that far off of the French Third Republic; a parliamentary republic where the President is merely ceremonial and the Chancellor is executive
So, it's a democracy overall? How does France keep control over a Rhineland where only a tiny minority wanted separation from Germany IOTL? Also, does the Rhineland state have female suffrage?
  • Indeed. Not to spoil much, but by the 1932 election the SPD ends up forming a coalition with... the KPD, since the alternative are nationalist/monarchist parties
Hate to break it to you, but the mere assertion that there are still elections in 1932 is a spoiler.
 
(late response, sorry)
Ok, so currency union with France.

I guess why I'm asking is, can the Weimar state do something like OTL's Ruhrkampf financing early? Though if the Rhineland is in a currency union with France, it probably can't. Which, ironically, might be a boon for the Weimar state in that the 1923 hyperinflation might not happen.

Alright. So, no German attempts to use the presence of Senegalese troops as a wedge issue to turn Anglo feminists against France. Though even then I'm a bit surprised that Germany still signs the treaty – even IOTL the French position was a bluff, Germany signed the treaty because they believed that the UK and US would be willing to use their navies to starve Germany into submission when they actually weren't.

So, it's a democracy overall? How does France keep control over a Rhineland where only a tiny minority wanted separation from Germany IOTL? Also, does the Rhineland state have female suffrage?

Hate to break it to you, but the mere assertion that there are still elections in 1932 is a spoiler.
  1. Indeed, although things will still get worse for them down the line... the Rhineland produced a lot of Germany's fertilizer, so now that they need to buy most of it, it's gonna lead to issues.
  2. I mean, with how much Germany was starving before the armistice, they don't have any reservations about signing a humiliating treaty any more.
  3. Admittedly, this question (how does France keep control) is harder to answer; France has troops stationed throughout all major cities, and while not mentioned in the story itself, the constitution of the Rhenish Republic specifically bans "German reunification."
  4. Answering the second part, from my research, female suffrage wasn't introduced in France until 1944, and given France oversees the Rhenish Republic, I'm under the assumption they heavily based it off theirs. So no, female suffrage isn't available. That being said, I can see female suffrage being introduced later on.
  5. Yes, it is a spoiler.
 
Chapter 2: How the Rhineland Works
A rather short chapter this time, focusing entirely on how the Rhenish Republic actually works. Please be patient with updates from now on, as I need to focus on school work.

Chapter 2: How the Rhineland Works​

Now is the time we look at the internal workings of the Rhineland.

In terms of the structure of the government, it was a presidential system where the head of state and government (chancellor) held executive power and ultimately had the final say in new laws requiring approval. However, it was unique in that the actual president was elected by a combined vote of the Federal Council (Bundesrat) and Federal Diet (Bundestag) and was accountable to the legislature. If the president ever loses confidence and is removed, the parliament is dissolved and a new election is called. Only a few other nations such as South Africa and Guiana have such a system in place.

The nation was divided into three areas (gebiete), those being the North Rhineland, the South Rhineland, and the Ruhr, each of which held power to legislate their own laws. In that regard, it was similar to Germany, however a key difference with the Rhineland was that the central government could suspend the state governments in the case of an emergency, so it was more like a devolved state than a true federal state. Later on, following calls from the people, a fourth state, the Saarland, was added.

The Bundesrat and Bundestag can be seen as the equivalent of the upper and lower houses many nations have, although this, at a legal level, is incorrect. The Bundesrat represents the territories and are not elected by the people, instead being delegated by state governments. The Bundestag, on the other hand, does function much like the House of Commons in the UK with each representative elected by the people. The status of the Bundesrat was clarified in the 1930s as “a second chamber existing beside the parliament.”

There were a number of political parties in the Rhenish Republic. The largest one, and the one that ruled the nation for its existence was the Centre Party (Zentrum), led by Christian democrats and social conservatives. The next largest was the Social Democratic Party (SDPR), led by… social democrats, naturally, and they were followed by the Communist Party (KPR) as the third largest party. Other parties existed, obviously, but they couldn’t hold a candle to the popularity the above held. Additionally, the constitution specifically banned parties whose purpose included “spreading the paradigm of pan-Germanism,” another clear anti-unification clause, although it didn’t stop some underground groups from operating.

This attempt at a ‘Rhenish national identity’ became the backbone of the entire constitution, which went out of its way to not include anything that would allow for pan-German ideals. For example, the official language was simply written out as “Rhenish” (French was also de jure one of the languages, but it was rarely taught and was more used for the armed forces), and the currency as the Rhenish franc rather than the Papiermark. Other places you would anticipate the word ‘German’ to be such as census data were substituted with ‘Rhenish’.

Officially, France was legally unable to interfere in the politics of the Rhineland, as it would result in it effectively becoming a French puppet state. However, they did nevertheless exert indirect influence through their stationing of troops in major cities to prevent civilians from expressing pan-German views… so basically gunboat diplomacy but with not gunboats and instead with guns. That being said, the soldiers were also explicitly told not to fire under any circumstances. Therefore, it is better to think of it as a client state.

The flag used is a horizontal tricolour of green, white, and red, with an aspect ratio of 3:5, taken from the former Prussian provinces of Rhine and Westphalia. This makes it nearly identical to the civil flags of Iran, just with a different aspect ratio and hues. Perhaps to prevent confusion, the state flag uses a coat of arms depicting a bend, horse, and rose.
AD_4nXcf-SO88tr3fCma1Ml5NBeF8Ncn5QSCffl5ZdfmmVvzoyD2DF5Pnuyu4J-iafxMUUMGfBvueQwdXVQ4qQn3oU85UFj7Und5LFqKT9UZ9l5HpWbrLcIEPZ2q2bdVx7SVrKhqK7jZR-sGbxRWBQIkAK9NaPvA
AD_4nXcUJ0AtF4OEqEXuILRohP9jXokDegrZrZydHrpA6CbdsZyqUgI7MpMRgvGTAIXG2v8inKdrrIcZMjkQ7NzUQ7Ih3PVG9tMyLRqOvJFZKpXhTS456BZnTDNvBgEbVrJa2XbWdJoJNq9leotLl03i0wErpUgL

Each individual state had their own flags, as well. The northern and southern states simply reused the Rhine flag, and Ruhr Westphalia. When the Saarland territory was created, it was given an unusual blue-white-black horizontal combination referencing the flags of Bavaria and Prussia, which the territory formerly comprised. A few sources oddly state that a Nordic cross with blue on the left and red on the right was used as the Saar flag, but there is no evidence that this was ever used.
 
Top