India is supposed to overtake the FBU as the leading Capitalist superpower.
Ah
India is supposed to overtake the FBU as the leading Capitalist superpower.
In her article "The Way to Winged Eros" she wrote: "On the one hand, a healthy sexual instinct - the attraction of the two sexes to each other for the purpose of reproduction under the pressure of ugly socio-economic relations, especially under the rule of capitalism, degenerated into unhealthy lust. In a self-sufficient goal, in a way to deliver one more "superfluous pleasure," into lust, exacerbated by excesses, perversions, the harmful whipping of the flesh. A man does not so converge with a woman that a healthy sexual inclination is imperious by Attracted him to the woman, but on the contrary, the man is looking for a woman, not yet experiencing any sexual need, so that, thanks to the proximity of this woman, cause a sexual desire and, thus, to enjoy himself the very fact of sexual intercourse.This builds prostitution If closeness to a woman does not cause the expected excitement, people full of sexual excess resort to all kinds of perversions. This is a deviation of the biological instinct underlying love between the sexes, towards unhealthy lust, leading the instinct far away from its original source. "She did say "Sexuality was a human instinct natural as hunger or thirst."
It also seems to match her beliefs.
In her article "The Way to Winged Eros" she wrote: "On the one hand, a healthy sexual instinct - the attraction of the two sexes to each other for the purpose of reproduction under the pressure of ugly socio-economic relations, especially under the rule of capitalism, degenerated into unhealthy lust. In a self-sufficient goal, in a way to deliver one more "superfluous pleasure," into lust, exacerbated by excesses, perversions, the harmful whipping of the flesh. A man does not so converge with a woman that a healthy sexual inclination is imperious by Attracted him to the woman, but on the contrary, the man is looking for a woman, not yet experiencing any sexual need, so that, thanks to the proximity of this woman, cause a sexual desire and, thus, to enjoy himself the very fact of sexual intercourse.This builds prostitution If closeness to a woman does not cause the expected excitement, people full of sexual excess resort to all kinds of perversions. This is a deviation of the biological instinct underlying love between the sexes, towards unhealthy lust, leading the instinct far away from its original source. "
""Wingless Eros" contradicts the interests of the working class: first, it inevitably leads to ... excesses, and therefore bodily depletion, which lowers the stock of labor energy in humanity. Secondly, it impoverishes the soul, preventing development and strengthening Emotional ties and sympathetic feelings, thirdly, he usually rests on the inequality of rights in the mutual relations of the sexes, on the dependence of women on men, on male self-sufficiency or insubordination, which undoubtedly acts depressingly on the development of a sense of camaraderie. Back is the presence of "winged Eros"."
I'm not an expert on her work, but from what I read, that was only casual sexual encounters. She was overall a proponent of free love.In her article "The Way to Winged Eros" she wrote: "On the one hand, a healthy sexual instinct - the attraction of the two sexes to each other for the purpose of reproduction under the pressure of ugly socio-economic relations, especially under the rule of capitalism, degenerated into unhealthy lust. In a self-sufficient goal, in a way to deliver one more "superfluous pleasure," into lust, exacerbated by excesses, perversions, the harmful whipping of the flesh. A man does not so converge with a woman that a healthy sexual inclination is imperious by Attracted him to the woman, but on the contrary, the man is looking for a woman, not yet experiencing any sexual need, so that, thanks to the proximity of this woman, cause a sexual desire and, thus, to enjoy himself the very fact of sexual intercourse.This builds prostitution If closeness to a woman does not cause the expected excitement, people full of sexual excess resort to all kinds of perversions. This is a deviation of the biological instinct underlying love between the sexes, towards unhealthy lust, leading the instinct far away from its original source. "
""Wingless Eros" contradicts the interests of the working class: first, it inevitably leads to ... excesses, and therefore bodily depletion, which lowers the stock of labor energy in humanity. Secondly, it impoverishes the soul, preventing development and strengthening Emotional ties and sympathetic feelings, thirdly, he usually rests on the inequality of rights in the mutual relations of the sexes, on the dependence of women on men, on male self-sufficiency or insubordination, which undoubtedly acts depressingly on the development of a sense of camaraderie. Back is the presence of "winged Eros"."
I myself infinitely respect this great woman, but she still condemned the domination of "Wingless Eros" (the usual sexual attraction without love) over "Winged Eros".But her views on sexuality were about tearing down old ideas on family relations, thus ITTL she becomes a cultural icon in the UASR, and ironically, not in her own country until much later.
This work isn't translated into English. Link to the original - https://www.marxists.org/russkij/kollontai/winged_eros.htmI'm not an expert on her work, but from what I read, that was only casual sexual encounters. She was overall a proponent of free love.
That said, this argument is off topic. And frankly, this is just another rehash of arguments you've already made.
Because, of course, people always embrace the exact, full belief system a person had, and not most of the time, just take their overall beliefs, and occasionally ignore parts that contradict their own personal beliefs.I myself infinitely respect this great woman, but she still condemned the domination of "Wingless Eros" (the usual sexual attraction without love) over "Winged Eros".
Forgive me. Still here, the ideas of another person were taught ....Because, of course, people always embrace the exact, full belief system a person had, and not most of the time, just take their overall beliefs, and occasionally ignore parts that contradict their own personal beliefs.
Once again, this is off-topic. There is a spillover thread for this stuff.
Sorry for the late response.So what do you think would be the most popular sort of ah.com TLs TTL, particularly in USAR and FBU, or anywhere else.
The series has undergone two revivals. The first was in the 80’s, with a short lived sequel series featuring Chico as an American policeman. The second was in a popular film adaptation by Michael Mann in 1993, which was much more warmly received by the Cuban exile community. Billed as a "re-thinking" of the series, the film starred Emilio Estevez as Chico, Dennis Hopper as O’Brien, and Cynthia Rothrock as Schwartz, as they investigate a pan-Caribbean drug trafficking ring with ties to Rhodesian terrorist. Valenzuela has a cameo as a singer at the Oriental Park Casino, who Chico dismisses as "not sounding like a real Cubano".
I wonder if ITTL there are going to be fictional villains that reflect the evils of Revolution. People who obsess about the letter of Revolution , but not the spirit, and create new kinds of terror wherever they go.
Characters ranging from General Ripper style military loons, to super-villains who were wronged in the past by communism.
I wonder if ITTL there are going to be fictional villains that reflect the evils of Revolution. People who obsess about the letter of Revolution , but not the spirit, and create new kinds of terror wherever they go.
Characters ranging from General Ripper style military loons, to super-villains who were wronged in the past by communism.
Does anyone have any thoughts about post-war economic reforms?The core of the American economy in this period was a hybrid between bottom-up matryoshka[1]of anarcho-syndicalism and top-down central planning.
Kosygin sought precisely this, and the type is named in honor of the Hungarian leader Janos Kadar, who built in his country the so-called. "Gulash-socialism" with elements of the Tito "self-government" and state. Capitalism. At this type, at the enterprises full self-management is entered, and powers of their heads extend. In fact, before the restoration of capitalism is near, but still strong state control does not fully establish market relations.
Under Titoism, self-government is established at all enterprises, and the basis of households. Relations "state-plant" becomes self-financing, which is unprofitable for the state, but is beneficial to the enterprise. The state reserves only control over heavy industry and the military-industrial complex, and the use of foreign capital is allowed in the economy. In fact, the bourgeoisie is recovering as a class, but it can not yet openly speak.
Which country will be the ITTL Japan: a nation that gains a reputation as an economic giant that lifts millions out of poverty, and that builds the reputation for being full of salarymen: people with an unhealthy dedication to their place of work.
I think ITTL, Reds would think of the salaryman as "the modern-day capitalist slave".
Probably one of The FBUs African colonies, or Brazil maybe.
India is explicitly described as being superpower status. I was assuming that you were referring to a country thst isnt a major milktaty power but has clout in economics.Africa and Brazil aren't places that I imagine would produce salarymen. Maybe India?