or one Challenger vs. 10 T-55's? The comparison is exactly not a one-to-one comparison.
If the price of the F-35 keeps going up, we may see a situation where nobody can afford the optimal number.
Without getting into direct comparisons, we might see that the F-35 is a fantastic jet (as the F-22), but is simply too expensive to be bought in numbers.
What will a buyer in that instance do? Maybe look at numbers of something affordable.
Whether this is the case with Australia going for F/A-18 is a good question.
How many Rafale can UK buy vs what they are planning to buy of F35's? and will it make sense to go for a bigger number of something comparable but less feature rich jets? And it is not saying that Rafale does not compare to F-35. They are in the same envelope.
What features to sacrifice for getting bigger numbers is the balance. what is the trade-off?
.. especially if the bigger number in itself is a quality.
Let us also face it. Numbers are important. There must be a minimum number of jets for a credible defence.
Ivan
If the price of the F-35 keeps going up, we may see a situation where nobody can afford the optimal number.
Without getting into direct comparisons, we might see that the F-35 is a fantastic jet (as the F-22), but is simply too expensive to be bought in numbers.
What will a buyer in that instance do? Maybe look at numbers of something affordable.
Whether this is the case with Australia going for F/A-18 is a good question.
How many Rafale can UK buy vs what they are planning to buy of F35's? and will it make sense to go for a bigger number of something comparable but less feature rich jets? And it is not saying that Rafale does not compare to F-35. They are in the same envelope.
What features to sacrifice for getting bigger numbers is the balance. what is the trade-off?
.. especially if the bigger number in itself is a quality.
Let us also face it. Numbers are important. There must be a minimum number of jets for a credible defence.
Ivan