There are a few I can think of off the top of my head. The Constitution doesn't actually guarantee anyone the right to vote in elections where the qualifications are determined by individual states. The 15th and 19th amendments require that if a state does give the right to vote to the public, then the right cannot be denied on account of race or gender. But a state can deny everyone the right to vote if it so chooses. So if Illinois decides that its electors for the electoral college are to be chosen by popular vote, then the popular vote must not exclude people on account of race or gender. However, Illinois can decide to have its electors chosen by the state legislature rather than the popular vote, in other words, deny everyone the right to vote (at least for presidential electors). This does not run afoul of either the 15th or 19th amendments.
As long as we're on the President, another amendment I would like to see passed is:
3) Repeal the 22nd amendment. No more term limits for the president. Seriously, has there ever been a good second term president ever? Rendering the president a lame duck as soon as he gets re-elected does no good for anyone. The one time a president did serve more than 2 terms (FDR), it was hardly a disaster for American government. Besides, most presidents have decided on their own that two terms was enough for them. I fail to see any harm resulting from the repealing of the presidential term limit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That may not be a bad idea, thought provoking to say the least. What would be the timing, after who? Eisenhower, Reagon, Clinton, probably Bush, it would go into effect.
All right here are the Presidents effected by the two term amendment (Note Truman could of served longer if he had wanted to, but Korea, the economy, and little scandals in his cabinet wore on him)
Dwight D Eisenhower had a good second term, cannot think of anything, had the U2 incident but US was rolling, seamed like he handled the U2 thing pretty well. Relations were getting a little better with the Soviets and then they shoot a plane down over their territory.
Ronald Reagan - Iran-Contra was a black eye, economy was actually better in second than first term, begin to see cracks in Soviet Union and East European communism, USA dominating Soviets as Reagan did not give up - overall, not too bad a second term. He did have a third term, George H.W. Bush from 1988 to 1992. I always liked the SNL skit that had Phil Hartman as Reagan acting as a bumbling, old idiot to the public but being the master schemer of world events with his staff behind closed doors.
Bill Clinton - Wasn't Lewinsky in his second term? Economy not too bad - overall not too bad, the guy was never too faithful to his wife in the first place so it could of been a problem in first term as well and a Republican congress along with Kenneth Starr were hounding him and Hillary.
W. - Iraq War went to pieces, had to surge troops, war was a bad plan from get go, bad war. Katrina handles badly, economy went to pieces at end. He had a definite bad second term and this was after 9/11 and Iraq War in first. Maybe with your reversal, he does not become elected in 2000 as Clinton serves a third term. Clinton may have been a little better than Gore, and that was all that was needed.
Obama - I would say that second term was pretty much same as first. US economy recovers some, so it may be a little better. Obama may have beat Donald if there was a third term. He would have been a better candidate than Hillary. But what would he fight for? Or would all he need for a slogan "I am not Hilliary or Donald". That would give him 4 more years
So yes, looking at it If there was no term limit, then there may have been no W. Bush and no Iraq War and no Trump. That would be worth it, and I voted for W., twice and am a solid Republican. But that is if the original amendment is repealed in time. ...... I think the reversal of the term limit amendment happens after Buss ii (W.), because that is the straw that breaks the camels back. Drats, we are still stuck with the Iraq War ..... at least we may not have a Donald
Now how about amending the Constitution for foreign born people to run for President. They would have to be sponsored by a previous President or Supreme Court Justice or something. But just think if we had an immigrant Presidential candidate like Arnold going against Ted Cruz and Donald in the primaries. How would the immigration debate and Syrian refugee debate go? Arnold may be even harder, more strict on these two regards.