No crisis of the third century?

Rather then paying off germanic tribes, Emperor Alexander Serverus burns them to the ground, and he dose not lose his soldiers respect.

So basically no civil war and they dont lose many of there cities, culture, economy, etc, and no roman decline, and they are not so soft for the germans to cut into.
 
You're simplifying a lot here, the Third Century Crisis was caused primarily by the Sasanians suddenly rising to power and exposing all the flaws in the way the early Roman Empire worked.

Basically, no Sasanians means the Principate style structure will continue on for a bit longer, but IMHO it's inevitable that there'll be a major "revolution" somewhere on one of Rome's borders, almost certainly in Persia, that'll end up having the same long term impact- that is, centralisation, and probably division of power within the Empire.
 
There's also some pretty major long-term economic problems underlying the Crisis. The late Republic and early Principate had been financed largely by plunder of conquered territories and the discovery of some new silver mines. By the third century, the Empire has largely run out of good places to conquer and plunder and the silver mines are running dry, but the soldiers still want salaries and provisions and the folks back home still want bread and circuses, so Emperors in the late Principate took to debasing the coinage. Augustus's denarius, for instance, was nearly pure silver, but by the reign of Gallienius, the denarius was almost pure copper. Nominal prices were rising accordingly, but nominal payments by the Empire weren't, leading to disgruntled soldiers and plebes. To avoid the Crisis of the Third Century, you need to find a way for the Emperor to actually pay his bills rather than trying to inflate them away.

Diocletian eventually addressed the problems by reentering the Empire in the East where the tax base was concentrated enough to support the administration and military, and letting the poorer West fend for itself on a shoestring budget. It'd be difficult to get there without some sort of chaotic transitional period, though.
 
Don't forget about the climatic factor. The growth or Roman Empire correspond to an eara where climate allowed mediterranean culture far north than OTL. When the temperatures began to lower, the cultures produced less and a certain loss of population occured.

Furthermore, the barbarian migrations occured because of this. The basins of Vistula or Danube produced less food than required for the germanic peoples, and they began to migrate south for that.

You can avoid dynastic collapses, civil war (but unlikely), even have a stalemate with the Sassanind (not a victory or annexation, these provinces were simply too far to be administred). But the climatic change is an important factor here.
 
Top