Philippine Culture and Society during the early Liberal Supremacy (1850s)
Philippine Culture and Society during the early Liberal Supremacy (1850s)
“There can be no tyrants where there are no slaves!” – Marcelino Florentino y Quema, 1851 speech to the Assembly
As the paradigm of the Philippine Republic shifted away from its almost monomaniacal focus on nation-building and economic development of the Patriotic Regime to other vital but less urgent issues, so too did the nation’s cultural concerns shift away from simple survival towards a focus on a coherence of vision for the Philippine nation. The 1850s fracturing of the Sons of the Country into the Liberals, Conservatives, and Nationalists – among other parties – led to a cultural divide and discourse between the two dominant strands of the nascent nation’s culture, between its sense of being part of a new world-spanning order and its nostalgia for the old and parochial Catholic order, with its simpler days and the old virtue of its monastic supremacy.
Of course, said monastic supremacy was itself a point of contention, with vanishingly few seeking a complete return to the old days of “being chained to a corpse”, as some Filipino nationalists would say of Bourbon Spain and its archaic and corrupt monastic orders, and not even the Pope had denied the degeneration of the Catholic Church in the Philippines and the wider Hispanic world in the days before independence, but the more pious Catholics of the country certainly did not feel comfort in the myriad socio-economic changes caused by independence and some of the more liberal and virulently anti-clerical policies of the republic.
Appealing to the Pope in Rome had helped the republic break the friar orders, but of course there were those who thought the secularization of the Catholic Church in the Philippines and the separation of church and state went too far, and the entrance of foreign non-Catholic missionaries into the republic was something met with backlash and no small amount of antipathy against this “many-faced horde of schismatics and heretics, inimical to the traditions of the Holy Mother Church”, in the words of a conservative thinker. And naturally, the liberals and the still relatively few converts to Protestantism (chief among them the famed satirist Osias Buenaventura) during the Patriotic Regime met this backlash with their own vitriol, finally coming to a head with the divisive mid-1850s reign and policies of President Florentino over the country.
Even with the divisive reputation of Florentino’s administration being a turning point, many of these cultural struggles and contentions found their beginnings in the late 1840s. And these struggles were bound up in various national and societal issues for the country, such as the expansion of the republic’s influence across Asia and the tensions that came with it, like the separation of church and state, the slow spread of various non-Catholic Christian churches in fits and starts, and above all the flood of Chinese migrants that deeply affected the Philippine Republic and its society to the point of disruption. Thankfully for the country, however, these tensions did not for many years erupt into all-out rebellion and civil war: instead, the culture wars took the place of direct civil unrest, and in place of riots and rebellions, the Philippine Republic saw a flowering of the arts and sciences, and the creation of the many separate strands of 19th century Filipino culture.
The Liberals, though later fragmenting into a number of factions ranging from radical utopians to pragmatists who sought to establish a united country, were united by a desire to establish a Philippine identity outside of the Catholic faith. As Chinese migrants had begun to flood the Philippines during the Taiping Revolution’s twists and turns, many native Filipinos – from all ethnicities and walks of life – felt a need to build up the newborn Filipino identity as both a “civilized” country and as a genuinely Asian nation with its own history.
Men such as Balagtas and Zorilla had already begun the native-language movement of Tagalismo with their writings and participation in the Liga Tagalo, and the years since Balagtas wrote his stories saw the rise of a new generation of poets to build up a genuinely Philippine mythology and literature. Beyond the Roman tales of Balagtas and the Biblical tales of Zorilla (among which is born the name and idea of Ofiria, the idealized pre-Hispanic Filipino polity), there was an increasing desire to learn more of the Malay race and its own past, and the historian Balduino’s writings were followed and responded to by many others.
With this desire, new scholars also took their first steps towards studying the native tongues of the country in a bid to construct a better understanding of Filipino culture before the Spaniards and thus – in an indirect way – to “prove” the worth of the Filipino nation. Grammarians and philologists made studies of not only Tagalog but the regional languages, and even the languages of the non-Christians of the archipelago such as those of the highlanders of the Cordilleras and the Moros of Sulu and Maguindanao. Alongside them, ethnographers and anthropologists studied the cultures and bodies of folklore of the various cultures of the Philippines, using newfangled European methods to analyze and understand all of these. This generation of scholarship would come to be a foundation for many later ideas and schools of thought, with later scholars seeing the affinity of the Philippine languages to not only the tongues of the south, but also the aboriginal tongues of the Mandate of Formosa. This latter affinity would have consequences in later years.
The Conservatives had much the same concerns as the previous group, yet unlike the Liberals, the League of the Pious and its affiliates were as far from anticlerical as one could get in the early republic, and with the rise of religious rivals they were deeply invested in keeping Catholicism the dominant religion, even as they sought less direct intervention from the central government in Manila. Their views regarding the faith were more orthodox and less tolerant of “the thousand heresies and misconceptions that had slowly come to infest the Filipino mind”, as yet another prominent conservative writer of Manila had put it, and they sought to build up a vision of their own for the nation, based upon the faith of their fathers. With the government detaching itself from being an arm of the faith as it once was, conservatives rose in the place of the regular clergy to argue for and defend the Catholic idea of the nation.
In their quest to do so, the conservatives built up their own cultural sphere and media, with the most prominent of their houses being the publishing house known as Ang Dating Daan, The Old Way. Through them were published many works of conservative literature of all kinds in Tagalog and Spanish, and translations of the classic works of the Western canon. Said works were given in their original Latin and Greek by the Church and Jesuit order as gifts to strengthen the Christian faith on the Philippine islands against the ruthless and relentless attacks of the anticlerical partisans of the country.
And finally, the Nationalists, being mostly moderates and pragmatists of many stripes, cared little in truth for the culture wars that had become increasingly common over the course of the 1850s, preferring instead to continue focusing on the economic development of the country inside their borders and the maintenance of diplomatic balance and expansion of Philippine influence outside of them.
Still, the Nationalists were not completely rational and pragmatic, though such was their usual reputation, and their methods and policies from the beginning were often calibrated to cleave to pragmatism and the prosperity of the country. The party of the Patriotic Regime still had a vision for the country, as a nation strong enough to stand on its own against its rivals and possible enemies, and they sought to achieve this regardless of the ideals of the two extreme ends of the political spectrum.
Many who cleaved to the Nationalists were not interested in the culture wars waged by the conservatives and liberals, and the scholars among them were more interested in works of the sciences and the classical professions of law and medicine than they were in less practical and far more experimental academic subjects such as the social sciences and humanities which were pushed more heavily by the liberals and their wild theories.
With all this, the nation at the time of the mid-1850s was set for further developments.
“There can be no tyrants where there are no slaves!” – Marcelino Florentino y Quema, 1851 speech to the Assembly
As the paradigm of the Philippine Republic shifted away from its almost monomaniacal focus on nation-building and economic development of the Patriotic Regime to other vital but less urgent issues, so too did the nation’s cultural concerns shift away from simple survival towards a focus on a coherence of vision for the Philippine nation. The 1850s fracturing of the Sons of the Country into the Liberals, Conservatives, and Nationalists – among other parties – led to a cultural divide and discourse between the two dominant strands of the nascent nation’s culture, between its sense of being part of a new world-spanning order and its nostalgia for the old and parochial Catholic order, with its simpler days and the old virtue of its monastic supremacy.
Of course, said monastic supremacy was itself a point of contention, with vanishingly few seeking a complete return to the old days of “being chained to a corpse”, as some Filipino nationalists would say of Bourbon Spain and its archaic and corrupt monastic orders, and not even the Pope had denied the degeneration of the Catholic Church in the Philippines and the wider Hispanic world in the days before independence, but the more pious Catholics of the country certainly did not feel comfort in the myriad socio-economic changes caused by independence and some of the more liberal and virulently anti-clerical policies of the republic.
Appealing to the Pope in Rome had helped the republic break the friar orders, but of course there were those who thought the secularization of the Catholic Church in the Philippines and the separation of church and state went too far, and the entrance of foreign non-Catholic missionaries into the republic was something met with backlash and no small amount of antipathy against this “many-faced horde of schismatics and heretics, inimical to the traditions of the Holy Mother Church”, in the words of a conservative thinker. And naturally, the liberals and the still relatively few converts to Protestantism (chief among them the famed satirist Osias Buenaventura) during the Patriotic Regime met this backlash with their own vitriol, finally coming to a head with the divisive mid-1850s reign and policies of President Florentino over the country.
Even with the divisive reputation of Florentino’s administration being a turning point, many of these cultural struggles and contentions found their beginnings in the late 1840s. And these struggles were bound up in various national and societal issues for the country, such as the expansion of the republic’s influence across Asia and the tensions that came with it, like the separation of church and state, the slow spread of various non-Catholic Christian churches in fits and starts, and above all the flood of Chinese migrants that deeply affected the Philippine Republic and its society to the point of disruption. Thankfully for the country, however, these tensions did not for many years erupt into all-out rebellion and civil war: instead, the culture wars took the place of direct civil unrest, and in place of riots and rebellions, the Philippine Republic saw a flowering of the arts and sciences, and the creation of the many separate strands of 19th century Filipino culture.
The Liberals, though later fragmenting into a number of factions ranging from radical utopians to pragmatists who sought to establish a united country, were united by a desire to establish a Philippine identity outside of the Catholic faith. As Chinese migrants had begun to flood the Philippines during the Taiping Revolution’s twists and turns, many native Filipinos – from all ethnicities and walks of life – felt a need to build up the newborn Filipino identity as both a “civilized” country and as a genuinely Asian nation with its own history.
Men such as Balagtas and Zorilla had already begun the native-language movement of Tagalismo with their writings and participation in the Liga Tagalo, and the years since Balagtas wrote his stories saw the rise of a new generation of poets to build up a genuinely Philippine mythology and literature. Beyond the Roman tales of Balagtas and the Biblical tales of Zorilla (among which is born the name and idea of Ofiria, the idealized pre-Hispanic Filipino polity), there was an increasing desire to learn more of the Malay race and its own past, and the historian Balduino’s writings were followed and responded to by many others.
With this desire, new scholars also took their first steps towards studying the native tongues of the country in a bid to construct a better understanding of Filipino culture before the Spaniards and thus – in an indirect way – to “prove” the worth of the Filipino nation. Grammarians and philologists made studies of not only Tagalog but the regional languages, and even the languages of the non-Christians of the archipelago such as those of the highlanders of the Cordilleras and the Moros of Sulu and Maguindanao. Alongside them, ethnographers and anthropologists studied the cultures and bodies of folklore of the various cultures of the Philippines, using newfangled European methods to analyze and understand all of these. This generation of scholarship would come to be a foundation for many later ideas and schools of thought, with later scholars seeing the affinity of the Philippine languages to not only the tongues of the south, but also the aboriginal tongues of the Mandate of Formosa. This latter affinity would have consequences in later years.
The Conservatives had much the same concerns as the previous group, yet unlike the Liberals, the League of the Pious and its affiliates were as far from anticlerical as one could get in the early republic, and with the rise of religious rivals they were deeply invested in keeping Catholicism the dominant religion, even as they sought less direct intervention from the central government in Manila. Their views regarding the faith were more orthodox and less tolerant of “the thousand heresies and misconceptions that had slowly come to infest the Filipino mind”, as yet another prominent conservative writer of Manila had put it, and they sought to build up a vision of their own for the nation, based upon the faith of their fathers. With the government detaching itself from being an arm of the faith as it once was, conservatives rose in the place of the regular clergy to argue for and defend the Catholic idea of the nation.
In their quest to do so, the conservatives built up their own cultural sphere and media, with the most prominent of their houses being the publishing house known as Ang Dating Daan, The Old Way. Through them were published many works of conservative literature of all kinds in Tagalog and Spanish, and translations of the classic works of the Western canon. Said works were given in their original Latin and Greek by the Church and Jesuit order as gifts to strengthen the Christian faith on the Philippine islands against the ruthless and relentless attacks of the anticlerical partisans of the country.
And finally, the Nationalists, being mostly moderates and pragmatists of many stripes, cared little in truth for the culture wars that had become increasingly common over the course of the 1850s, preferring instead to continue focusing on the economic development of the country inside their borders and the maintenance of diplomatic balance and expansion of Philippine influence outside of them.
Still, the Nationalists were not completely rational and pragmatic, though such was their usual reputation, and their methods and policies from the beginning were often calibrated to cleave to pragmatism and the prosperity of the country. The party of the Patriotic Regime still had a vision for the country, as a nation strong enough to stand on its own against its rivals and possible enemies, and they sought to achieve this regardless of the ideals of the two extreme ends of the political spectrum.
Many who cleaved to the Nationalists were not interested in the culture wars waged by the conservatives and liberals, and the scholars among them were more interested in works of the sciences and the classical professions of law and medicine than they were in less practical and far more experimental academic subjects such as the social sciences and humanities which were pushed more heavily by the liberals and their wild theories.
With all this, the nation at the time of the mid-1850s was set for further developments.