List Political Parties of Alternate Countries

[Deleted member 139407]

Alaskan People's Republic
Government: Unitary semi-presidential republic
Biography: During the Long Summer in the United States, when federal authority became incredibly discredited, two states declared independence for two very different reasons. One of the states was Alaska. In their declaration of independence, the Alaskan legislature emphasized a lack of coordination with the Federal government in securing funds for Alaskans. This motif was captured in the line "It is in the opinion of this adjourned legislature that the current administration and the flailing government occupying the District of Columbia is intent on keeping Alaska tethered to its decaying corpse trying to extract every last drop of legitimacy from our state." The Alaskan People's Republic, named as such without intended reference to socialist ideology, declared its independence on June 19, 2028 and only saw one battle, the Battle of Anchorage, which cemented its independence. In the years post-independence, the political landscape of Alaska has come into its own.

Democratic-Republican Coalition Front:​

Ideology: Big-tent, Centrism, Pro-Cooperation (with the DC Government), Anti-pipeline (Faction)​

History: The DRCF has a long history in Alaska's coalition politics. In the pre-Independence days, Democrats and Republicans would frequently cross party lines to ensure common governance in the state. This would eventually extend into its independence position as both Democrats and Republicans began to grow distant from DC. With the declaration of independence came also with the Declaration of Coalition between the two parties. To this day, the DRCF is the most consistently popular party in Alaska, although several parties are starting to push forward.​

Senate: 15/20​

House of Representatives: 24/40​

Alaskan Independent's Party:​

Ideology: Economic libertarianism, social conservatism, Alaskan nationalism, populism, anti-cooperation​

History: This party has direct roots in the Alaskan Independence Party. Seeing how their goal was achieved, and how they got none of the credit for starting that conversation around independence in the 1984, they looked to form a new and cohesive identity for an independent Alaska. Joining with the Libertarian Party and taking cues from the Mises Caucus-dominated continental Libertarian Party, they adopted a socially conservative, and economically libertarian program and have seen moderate success in the legislature, but great success in achieving the governorship.​

Governorship: Yes​

Senate: 2/20​

House of Representatives: 6/40​

True Homeland Party:​

Ideology: Pro-reintegration, American nationalism, Trumpism​

History: Not everyone in Alaska was pleased with the Declaration of Independence. This party, split from the pre-independence GOP, are the only pro-DC party to have achieved seats in the Alaskan legislature. This party refuses to run candidates for the governorship. Many claim that the members of this party are paid spies from the DC government to try and reclaim Alaska under the DC government. The contributing factor to this is that DC and Alaska have not yet signed a treaty to certify its independence, ergo, placing Alaska under de facto control of DC. Complicating this even further is the recognition of Alaskan independence by Vietnam, Myanmar, Somaliand, South Africa, Greece, Singapore, and Indonesia.​

Senate: 2/20​

House of Representatives: 2/40​

7-Star Justice Party:​

Ideology: Gravelism, progressivism, social libertarianism, direct democracy​

History: This political party was formed by many Gen Z-ers who fled (back) to Alaska given the violence in the continental United States. Seeing how the conversation in Alaska is dominated centrist collaboration, many progressives want to see a change in Alaskan politics and make it more "Alaskan" rather than pre-independence Alaskan. For that, they turned to the personal manifesto and ideology of the late-Senator Mike Gravel. When the 7-Star Justice Party won their first seats in the legislature despite not running a candidate for the governorship, the chairperson of the party said "this party is only just getting started." The name "7-Star" references the seven stars in the Big Dipper and takes inspiration from the 5 Star Movement in Italy.​

Senate: 1/20​

House of Representatives: 2/40​

As you'll notice in the seat counts, there are a handful of independents in the House of Representatives. In tandem with these parties, there are non-voting delegates from several Alaskan native tribes; they are non-voting due to greater autonomy they have within the APR. The delegates do have the power to testify/speak on the floor of the House and can serve on numerous House committees; currently, the Tlingit representative serves on the House Committee for Fishing and Maritime Activities.

 

[President Eternal]

I'd be very interested in seeing more of this TL's setting.

 

[Deleted member 139407]

I'd be very interested in seeing more of this TL's setting.

Thank you! There are so many timelines which see the Union implode through years of lead or a modern version of the 1860 Civil War, but my interest was caught by a now defunct timeline which aw the Union putter out a la Somalia where DC is "in charge" in name only with more legitimate successor states dotting the country. I'll have to look for it and link it here to give it due diligence.

EDIT: It was @Iron_Lord's "WI: (2040) The United States has gone 'Somalia' since 2031. What does the World Look like now?"

 

[Meshakhad]

Thank you! There are so many timelines which see the Union implode through years of lead or a modern version of the 1860 Civil War, but my interest was caught by a now defunct timeline which aw the Union putter out a la Somalia where DC is "in charge" in name only with more legitimate successor states dotting the country. I'll have to look for it and link it here to give it due diligence.

EDIT: It was @Iron_Lord's "WI: (2040) The United States has gone 'Somalia' since 2031. What does the World Look like now?"

Can you provide us a link?

 

[Deleted member 139407]

Can you provide us a link?

https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/wi-2040-the-united-states-has-gone-somalia-since-2031-what-does-the-world-look-like-now.490291/

Looking back on it, it looks more like a discussion/thought experiment than a timeline

 

[Deleted member 139407]

Alaskan People's Republic
Government: Unitary semi-presidential republic
Biography: During the Long Summer in the United States, when federal authority became incredibly discredited, two states declared independence for two very different reasons. One of the states was Alaska. In their declaration of independence, the Alaskan legislature emphasized a lack of coordination with the Federal government in securing funds for Alaskans. This motif was captured in the line "It is in the opinion of this adjourned legislature that the current administration and the flailing government occupying the District of Columbia is intent on keeping Alaska tethered to its decaying corpse trying to extract every last drop of legitimacy from our state." The Alaskan People's Republic, named as such without intended reference to socialist ideology, declared its independence on June 19, 2028 and only saw one battle, the Battle of Anchorage, which cemented its independence. In the years post-independence, the political landscape of Alaska has come into its own.

Democratic-Republican Coalition Front:​

Ideology: Big-tent, Centrism, Pro-Cooperation (with the DC Government), Anti-pipeline (Faction)​

History: The DRCF has a long history in Alaska's coalition politics. In the pre-Independence days, Democrats and Republicans would frequently cross party lines to ensure common governance in the state. This would eventually extend into its independence position as both Democrats and Republicans began to grow distant from DC. With the declaration of independence came also with the Declaration of Coalition between the two parties. To this day, the DRCF is the most consistently popular party in Alaska, although several parties are starting to push forward.​

Senate: 15/20​

House of Representatives: 24/40​

Alaskan Independent's Party:​

Ideology: Economic libertarianism, social conservatism, Alaskan nationalism, populism, anti-cooperation​

History: This party has direct roots in the Alaskan Independence Party. Seeing how their goal was achieved, and how they got none of the credit for starting that conversation around independence in the 1984, they looked to form a new and cohesive identity for an independent Alaska. Joining with the Libertarian Party and taking cues from the Mises Caucus-dominated continental Libertarian Party, they adopted a socially conservative, and economically libertarian program and have seen moderate success in the legislature, but great success in achieving the governorship.​

Governorship: Yes​

Senate: 2/20​

House of Representatives: 6/40​

True Homeland Party:​

Ideology: Pro-reintegration, American nationalism, Trumpism​

History: Not everyone in Alaska was pleased with the Declaration of Independence. This party, split from the pre-independence GOP, are the only pro-DC party to have achieved seats in the Alaskan legislature. This party refuses to run candidates for the governorship. Many claim that the members of this party are paid spies from the DC government to try and reclaim Alaska under the DC government. The contributing factor to this is that DC and Alaska have not yet signed a treaty to certify its independence, ergo, placing Alaska under de facto control of DC. Complicating this even further is the recognition of Alaskan independence by Vietnam, Myanmar, Somaliand, South Africa, Greece, Singapore, and Indonesia.​

Senate: 2/20​

House of Representatives: 2/40​

7-Star Justice Party:​

Ideology: Gravelism, progressivism, social libertarianism, direct democracy​

History: This political party was formed by many Gen Z-ers who fled (back) to Alaska given the violence in the continental United States. Seeing how the conversation in Alaska is dominated centrist collaboration, many progressives want to see a change in Alaskan politics and make it more "Alaskan" rather than pre-independence Alaskan. For that, they turned to the personal manifesto and ideology of the late-Senator Mike Gravel. When the 7-Star Justice Party won their first seats in the legislature despite not running a candidate for the governorship, the chairperson of the party said "this party is only just getting started." The name "7-Star" references the seven stars in the Big Dipper and takes inspiration from the 5 Star Movement in Italy.​

Senate: 1/20​

House of Representatives: 2/40​

As you'll notice in the seat counts, there are a handful of independents in the House of Representatives. In tandem with these parties, there are non-voting delegates from several Alaskan native tribes; they are non-voting due to greater autonomy they have within the APR. The delegates do have the power to testify/speak on the floor of the House and can serve on numerous House committees; currently, the Tlingit representative serves on the House Committee for Fishing and Maritime Activities.

Most Serene Republic of Texas
Government: Totalitarian illiberal democratic theocracy
Biography: The Long Summer, strengthened by clashes between pro-Executive and pro-Judicial protests, would see the first successful coup on American soil in the post-January 6th environment. However, DC wasn't the target. Texas, considered a pro-Judicial state, would see a violent coup d'état at the hands of a pro-independence militia, calling itself the Texas National Salvation Front with collaborators in law enforcement and pro-independence legislators known as the Siege of Austin. In its address after the siege declaring independence from the Union, the group claimed all of the state of Texas under its rule; though some have expressed the desire to claim the areas previously claimed by the original Republic of Texas. Many, in the comfort of their high rise apartments or secluded mansions in the Bahamas, claimed that Gilead had finally arrived and then slept soundly, doing little about it. Others, got to work within and outside of the new system through illiberal elections and through extrajudicial action. Texas was at war with itself within the month in what is now known as The Lone Star War. In the meantime, the Most Serene Republic has only established "formal" relations with Hungary when the two leaders of each country engaged in a Zoom call after its declaration of independence. However, the Hungarian government, currently embattled in its own "long summer", has refused to come to the aid of or merely mention the word Texas publicly since then.

National Salvation Party of Texas:​

Ideology: National Conservatism, Christian nationalism, Social conservatism, Economic nationalism (faction), Texan Manifest Destiny (faction)​

History: The roots of this party can be traced to the Waco siege; while many militant Christians went into hiding, some began to organize. As tensions began to rise in the beginning of the Long Summer, the nascent Texas First group joined up with 3% and 2nd Revolution militias in the area to form the Front. The party, itself, was established to give the appearance of a "democratic" governing system in this violently Christian fascist republic. In reality, the Emergency Council is under the direct control of the Secretary-President, who, himself, is the Commander-in-Chief of the militia, styled as the Texan National Army.​

Emergency Council: 23/25​

Nonpartisan League:​

Ideology: Big-tent, Reformism, Obstructionism (Unofficial official position)​

History: As hinted in the biography, this party was formed by electoralist elements of the anti-National Salvation rebellion. While many in the party would describe themselves as progressives or simply anti-independence, any mention of that in the Council meetings would have the party banned and the League members killed in public display. So, it presents itself as a pro-independence, big tent organization. It's sole purpose, established in secret, is to obstruct the processes of the Emergency Council to act in its full and total capacity.​

Emergency Council: 2/25​

​

At the present, the MSRT holds control of everything between Austin, Odessa and Eagle Pass, and has been successfully confined to these regions despite attempts to establish pro-National Salvation control and subsequent terrorist acts in Dallas, Lubbock, Corpus Christi, and Hobbs, New Mexico. However, with the Magnolia Free Army, the Houston remnant Texas government, volunteer brigades, and the New Mexican National Guard causing good trouble within Texas, the MSRT looks to be in serious trouble. The Alaskan People's Republic has repeatedly offered its financial and arms support to the Houston remnant government. To its south, many in Mexico's government have called for military intervention in Texas due to rumors of labor camps using kidnapped Mexicans. In response to these rumors and clamoring in Congress, the Mexican President has been in close contact with the POTUS over the issue.

 

[President Eternal]

Glad to see more of this TL.

Leave it to Texas to have its own civil war against the backdrop of a larger one.

 

[Deleted member 139407]

Glad to see more of this TL.

Leave it to Texas to have its own civil war against the backdrop of a larger one.

I will leave it for the third and final installment of this TL, but the Long Summer is notably less bloody than the Lone Star War. The war in Texas is on par with the Irish Troubles and is quite bloody. I neglected to mention that the TNSF did execute a majority of opposition members on top of the ensuing street fighting in Austin to consolidate their power. Alaska's and Texas's independence are definitely the bloodiest the Long Summer gets, and Alaska only needed one battle for the outstretched Feds to go "Okay, we'll talk about this later."

 

[Deleted member 139407]

Most Serene Republic of Texas
Government: Totalitarian illiberal democratic theocracy
Biography: The Long Summer, strengthened by clashes between pro-Executive and pro-Judicial protests, would see the first successful coup on American soil in the post-January 6th environment. However, DC wasn't the target. Texas, considered a pro-Judicial state, would see a violent coup d'état at the hands of a pro-independence militia, calling itself the Texas National Salvation Front with collaborators in law enforcement and pro-independence legislators known as the Siege of Austin. In its address after the siege declaring independence from the Union, the group claimed all of the state of Texas under its rule; though some have expressed the desire to claim the areas previously claimed by the original Republic of Texas. Many, in the comfort of their high rise apartments or secluded mansions in the Bahamas, claimed that Gilead had finally arrived and then slept soundly, doing little about it. Others, got to work within and outside of the new system through illiberal elections and through extrajudicial action. Texas was at war with itself within the month in what is now known as The Lone Star War. In the meantime, the Most Serene Republic has only established "formal" relations with Hungary when the two leaders of each country engaged in a Zoom call after its declaration of independence. However, the Hungarian government, currently embattled in its own "long summer", has refused to come to the aid of or merely mention the word Texas publicly since then.

National Salvation Party of Texas:​

Ideology: National Conservatism, Christian nationalism, Social conservatism, Economic nationalism (faction), Texan Manifest Destiny (faction)​

History: The roots of this party can be traced to the Waco siege; while many militant Christians went into hiding, some began to organize. As tensions began to rise in the beginning of the Long Summer, the nascent Texas First group joined up with 3% and 2nd Revolution militias in the area to form the Front. The party, itself, was established to give the appearance of a "democratic" governing system in this violently Christian fascist republic. In reality, the Emergency Council is under the direct control of the Secretary-President, who, himself, is the Commander-in-Chief of the militia, styled as the Texan National Army.​

Emergency Council: 23/25​

Nonpartisan League:​

Ideology: Big-tent, Reformism, Obstructionism (Unofficial official position)​

History: As hinted in the biography, this party was formed by electoralist elements of the anti-National Salvation rebellion. While many in the party would describe themselves as progressives or simply anti-independence, any mention of that in the Council meetings would have the party banned and the League members killed in public display. So, it presents itself as a pro-independence, big tent organization. It's sole purpose, established in secret, is to obstruct the processes of the Emergency Council to act in its full and total capacity.​

Emergency Council: 2/25​

​

At the present, the MSRT holds control of everything between Austin, Odessa and Eagle Pass, and has been successfully confined to these regions despite attempts to establish pro-National Salvation control and subsequent terrorist acts in Dallas, Lubbock, Corpus Christi, and Hobbs, New Mexico. However, with the Magnolia Free Army, the Houston remnant Texas government, volunteer brigades, and the New Mexican National Guard causing good trouble within Texas, the MSRT looks to be in serious trouble. The Alaskan People's Republic has repeatedly offered its financial and arms support to the Houston remnant government. To its south, many in Mexico's government have called for military intervention in Texas due to rumors of labor camps using kidnapped Mexicans. In response to these rumors and clamoring in Congress, the Mexican President has been in close contact with the POTUS over the issue.

United States of America
Government: Federal semi-presidential republic
Biography: The Long Summer, as it has been come to be known as, officially began in June 2027, but was caused by several previous factors. Among these were political polarization between Democrats and Republicans, increased social tensions between demographics, and growing economic tensions between the working and upper classes despite the economy being perceived as healthy. However, the greatest reason was the growing tensions between the imperial Presidency and the imperial Supreme Court. Currently, the Presidency and the House are occupied by the Democrats after a narrow win in 2024 while the Supreme Court and (tied) Senate currently are tilted Republican. Things came to a head when the Supreme Court ruled against an Executive Order meant to officiate the sale of "abortion" pills across the country and shifted it back to Congress to decide; it also drastically reduced the President's power to declare a public health emergency. This, combined with the above factors, pushed the American people over the edge. A retaliation bill was introduced in Congress which, in retaliation to that, led to the House and select Senate GOP members to stage a walkout of Congress. In response, new elections were declared; no Republicans willing to take a seat in an illegitimate and imperial government. This led to the formation of the National Emergency Governing Council, led by some of the same Republicans who walked out, rallying around the Supreme and other likeminded courts. While, officially, a registered advocacy PAC group, it is acting and spouting language as if it were the legitimate government of the United States. This is causing a legitimacy crisis in DC, but is localized entirely within the United States.

White House Government (Legitimate)​

Democratic-Working Families Party:​

Ideology: Progressivism, social democracy, populism​

History: The youngest of the parties in Congress, the DWFP was a long predicted merger as the Democrats tended more to the left. This was foretold as in the 2024 elections, an independent WFP nominee won out in New York's 17th District which instigated conversations with the leadership talks between the Democrats and the WFP. As more conservative and centrists flocked to the NAP, the unification became a matter of "when", not "if". The party functions as a big-tent party between "Squad progressives," "Old guard social democrats," "left populists," and the occasional New Democrat.​

Presidency: Yes​

Senate: 47/100​

House of Representatives: 281/435​

National Alliance Party:​

Ideology: Centrism, Neoliberalism, Liberal conservatism, electoral reformism​

History: Imagine, if you will, if the remaining conservative Democrats, some bold centrist Democrats, modern Whigs, and liberal New England Republicans formed a new party. You have the National Alliance Party. Initially a merger between both the Forward and Alliance parties in 2025, the NAP has soon grown to be the true "Common sense" party in American politics. However, their votes have been, more often than not, been a result of vote splitting with only select cases being popularly elected by a majority of voters. This has forced the party to adopt electoral reform positions already promoted by the above DWFP.​

Senate: 27/100​

House of Representatives: 72/435​

Libertarian Party of the United States:​

Ideology: Laissez-Faire capitalism, classical liberalism, Non-interventionism​

History: The Libertarians are technically the oldest party currently involved in the legitimate government, as they were formed in the 1970s. Originally formed concerning the Nixon administration's increased military action in southeast Asia, government overreach, and economic concerns, the Libertarians have often cemented themselves as the "protest vote" party. However, recently weighing in on the culture war and in developments with the NEGC, the Libertarians have reaffirmed their anti-government and anti-foreign war stances while coupling it with a generally conservative stance around economics and some social questions like prayer in school and gun restrictions.​

Senate: 23/100​

House of Representatives: 71/435​

Grand Old Party:​

Ideology: Conservatism, liberal conservatism​

History: Formed just in time for the 2028 elections, this party, with its primary support based in Utah and Virginia, is the "common sense conservatives" which did not flock to the National Alliance or the Libertarians. These Republicans still hold on to the idea that the "GOP" label can be revived in the current political environment. Suffice to say, their appeal is being consolidated into some strongholds, but nowhere else.​

Senate: 3/100​

House of Representatives: 10/435​

Keystone Party of Pennsylvania:​

Ideology: Social libertarianism, economic libertarianism, electoral reformism​

History: This party split from the Libertarian Party as the Mises Caucus, and its specific ideology, grew more powerful within the organization. In fact, for the longest time, the. Keystone Party saw little to no success until a prominent conservative Pennsylvania Democrat switched their party registration over the party's merger with the WFP. However, this may be the only success the party will have as that Congressperson is facing a powerful DWFP challenger who is consistently pulling away with the lead.​

Senate: 0/100​

House of Representatives: 1/435​

​

National Emergency Governing Council (Illegitimate)​

Republican Party:​

Ideology: National Conservatism, Trumpism​

History: The Republican Party was formed in the late 1850s in opposition to the slavocracy promoted by the Democrats and in opposition to lukewarm Whigs who were soft on Slavery. However, the modern Republican Party has its roots in the "Silent Majority" ideology of Richard Nixon and intensified by the presidency of Ronald Reagan. Intensified by the Great Recession, the rightward shift of the Republicans was solidified by the rise of internet politics, populism, and Tea Party politics. Confined to their echo chambers and hype machines while vying for a time that never was, the Republicans grew further and further right-wing. Proving to be incompetent in the current system, they decided participation wouldn't allow for some of its more untenable goals to be achieved. However, as news spreads throughout the country and the world about the atrocities and human rights abuses in the NEGC and the states involved within it, the credibility of the Republicans has been in a downward trend. Many within the party either don't know or are too involved to care what others say except for their allies.​

Council Seats: 130/130​

No legitimate government has dared to recognize the NEGC as the legitimate US government; the flailing government of the Most Serene Republic of Texas, being unrecognized by a supermajority of nations, is the only nation to recognize the NEGC as the legitimate government. The only state governments that have recognized the NEGC are the states of Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, South Dakota, and West Virginia; Indiana is currently considering recognizing the NEGC. Internationally, some states are friendly towards the NEGC without going so far as to recognize them: Hungary, El Salvador, (both of which are engulfed in varying levels of civil conflict), and Transnistria. The US's NATO Allies, the Alaskan People's Republic (in exchange for official independence), and a majority of members of BRICS have offered support to the White House government. However, as calls for reform grow louder, the Long Summer continues on, and threats of open conflict between the NEGC and DC Government grow, according to some rumors in the White House and on Capitol Hill, the infamous Directive 51 and an official declaration of martial law in current and future NEGC states is being viewed in increasingly favorable light.

 

[President Eternal]

Oh, okay, so it's more like a cold civil war rather than an outright conflict at the moment? Either way, very fascinating, especially as it's allowing for the conflict in Texas and Alaska's independence.

This scenario really would be great to see as its own thread.

BTW, who's running the NEGC, and where is it headquartered? Because if they've renounced the White House government, I don't see them sticking around DC.

 

[Deleted member 139407]

Oh, okay, so it's more like a cold civil war rather than an outright conflict at the moment? Either way, very fascinating, especially as it's allowing for the conflict in Texas and Alaska's independence.

This scenario really would be great to see as its own thread.

BTW, who's running the NEGC, and where is it headquartered? Because if they've renounced the White House government, I don't see them sticking around DC.

When starting this, I specifically wanted to avoid mentioning Current Politics people because I wanted to focus on the parties and the macro-structures. For the NEGC, let's just say that while there is a President, a fellow councillor elected by the council, and a person to associate the NEGC with, more than likely from Florida, the real power is behind the scenes with loads of scheming and corruption between councillors; in reality, the President is an empty figurehead whose sole purpose is to puff up the war chest of the Council. As for where they've set up? I'm thinking either Little Rock, Arkansas or Tallahassee, Florida.

In specific inspiration of the cold civil war, aside from the aforementioned "America Gone Somalia" thread, I looked to the Nullification Crisis, the Summer of 2020 BLM protests (I know they weren't going to lead to Civil War, but I looked to it for the protest aspect of the Long Summer) and the days before the Civil War began. The only conflict areas are Texas with the occasional anarchist free space a la the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone; the situation in Alaska, I've now determined, was a special federal operation in Anchorage which was driven out by local law enforcement/militia. Still, it took one simple act for the Civil War to go hot; the metaphorical light to the fuse of the powder keg.

 

[President Eternal]

That's okay, I didn't need specific names, I was more curious about the organizational structure, so thanks for explaining that.

 

[Deleted member 139407]

That's okay, I didn't need specific names, I was more curious about the organizational structure, so thanks for explaining that.

No problem, mate 👍

 

[AstroRangerBeans]

What countries are the most likely to volunteer for both NEGC and legitimate White House government forces?

 

[Deleted member 139407]

What countries are the most likely to volunteer for both NEGC and legitimate White House government forces?

I'm sorry, what do you mean? I don't follow...

 

[AstroRangerBeans]

I'm sorry, what do you mean? I don't follow...

I mean, the question is about whom the countries are sending their foreign volunteers to both NEGC and the White House government in case of an open war?

For example, the Nazi Germans and Italians sent their own forces as a volunteer for the Spanish Nationalists during the Spanish Civil War between the Republicans and the Nationalists?

 

[Deleted member 139407]

I mean, the question is about whom the countries are sending their foreign volunteers to both NEGC and the White House government in case of an open war?

For example, the Nazi Germans and Italians sent their own forces as a volunteer for the Spanish Nationalists during the Spanish Civil War between the Republicans and the Nationalists?

Ooooooh, I see!

Well, I alluded to coordination with Mexico in the Texas entry. If the situation does develop into open civil war, I imagine volunteers from NATO would come to the support the United States White House government through Canada. International volunteer brigades without a given country could also pop up similar to the Rojava volunteers. As far as volunteers for the NEGC, it could possibly involve Russian coordination and the aforementioned Texas (who may just up and unite with the NEGC when the time comes), El Salvador and Hungary; though given how these three are involved in civil war, the support from them are more than likely severely limited.

To be quite honest, I didn’t give much thought to the international situation as this was just a one-off thought exercise while I’m writing a manuscript, but given how the NEGC also has little to no foreign support going into the war, most nations may opt for more hyperbolic support rather than genuine military contributions. They could also just say “Oh, our citizens just left to fight you on their own volition.”

 

[AstroRangerBeans]

Ooooooh, I see!

Well, I alluded to coordination with Mexico in the Texas entry. If the situation does develop into open civil war, I imagine volunteers from NATO would come to the support the United States White House government through Canada. International volunteer brigades without a given country could also pop up similar to the Rojava volunteers. As far as volunteers for the NEGC, it could possibly involve Russian coordination and the aforementioned Texas (who may just up and unite with the NEGC when the time comes), El Salvador and Hungary; though given how these three are involved in civil war, the support from them are more than likely severely limited.

To be quite honest, I didn’t give much thought to the international situation as this was just a one-off thought exercise while I’m writing a manuscript, but given how the NEGC also has little to no foreign support going into the war, most nations may opt for more hyperbolic support rather than genuine military contributions. They could also just say “Oh, our citizens just left to fight you on their own volition.”

Okay.

Anyways, how does life looked like when taking the glimpse from the people's perspective living in the NEGC territory?

 

[Deleted member 139407]

Okay.

Anyways, how does life looked like when taking the glimpse from the people's perspective living in the NEGC territory?

Life in the NGEC Territory is trending toward illiberal democracy like Hungary where civil rights are slowly and quietly being eroded away (access to abortion, healthcare privileges, education) while the official newsletter of the PAC, treated as the state-run newspaper, is just opinion piece after opinion piece portrayed as fact and attacking the White House government for acting unconstitutionally against the totally legitimate Supreme Court. Texas, outside of the Houston-remnant government, is full on Christian theocracy and military dictatorship with implied segregation and no fair elections.

 

[AstroRangerBeans]

Life in the NGEC Territory is trending toward illiberal democracy like Hungary where civil rights are slowly and quietly being eroded away (access to abortion, healthcare privileges, education) while the official newsletter of the PAC, treated as the state-run newspaper, is just opinion piece after opinion piece portrayed as fact and attacking the White House government for acting unconstitutionally against the totally legitimate Supreme Court. Texas, outside of the Houston-remnant government, is full on Christian theocracy and military dictatorship with implied segregation and no fair elections.

How about a glimpse of what internet censorship would look like?
What happened to other local TV stations? Did they just take over and install a state-run TV network?