12th May 1995.
A spokesman for the Leader of the Labour Party, John Smith, announces that he has miraculously survived a heart attack in the morning, and that he will take a short break to fully recover. Margaret Beckett shall serve as Acting Labour Leader.
19th June 1995.
Smith returns as Leader of the Opposition, welcomed back by many opposition politicians and some sympathetic Conservatives. A poll is released - it shows Smith’s approval rating has raised by around 7% since his heart attack. He is certainly the favourite to succeed Major.
1st May 1997
And the crowd goes wild! The results of the 1997 General Election:
Labour, 377
Conservative, 233
Liberal Democrat, 41
Others, 9
Smith approaches Downing Street with his wife. A heartfelt call from Major softens his victory speech, and instead of sneering at the Tories he focuses on the opportunities of a new Labour majority. His Cabinet is announced the next day.
Yes 12th May. But his policies lived on. All of Blair's sucessful polocies were really Smith's. It was when he ran out of the Smith to do list that he began to have problems having litle programme of his own that tending to be a problem for rootless opportunists like Blair.I thought John Smith died in 1994.
How? It should be remembered that Blair was the one who started to develop a closer relationship with Ashdown, coordinated attack lines with him, and even pulled out resources out of Tory-Lib Dem marginals where Labour was not a threat. That, and the fact that those Tories flirting with voting Lib Dem would probably be mildly more wary of a more left wing Smith government than a Blair one, would probably mean the Lib Dems do not benefit from as many tactical votes in this scenario, and possibly do worse as a result.Actually I think the tories would have lost by even more under Smith. The Lib Dems would be closer to him and more tactial votes
Yes 12th May. But his policies lived on. All of Blair's sucessful polocies were really Smith's. It was when he ran out of the Smith to do list that he began to have problems having litle programme of his own that tending to be a problem for rootless opportunists like Blair.
Fair enough. Concentrate upon what you want to doMy focus is on Smith’s premiership rather than his continued tenure as Labour Leader. His manifesto was slightly (slightly) more left-wing than Blair, focused quite a lot on the Union and devolution and generally outshone the Tories.
How? It should be remembered that Blair was the one who started to develop a closer relationship with Ashdown, coordinated attack lines with him, and even pulled out resources out of Tory-Lib Dem marginals where Labour was not a threat. That, and the fact that those Tories flirting with voting Lib Dem would probably be mildly more wary of a more left wing Smith government than a Blair one, would probably mean the Lib Dems do not benefit from as many tactical votes in this scenario, and possibly do worse as a result.
I think more research is probably needed on this. The Socialist Campaign Group were never much of a problem back in the Blair years, simply because they were so few in number. With Smith winning a similar majority ITTL, there isnt any reason why they would be more of a problem. If anything, they would be more amenable to his Premiership than Blair's, as Smith had always enjoyed good relations with Labour left MPs-to the point that many of them voted for him over a more left wing candidate in 1992.1997 was a generally good year for the Smith administration. Leading in approval roles and 400 of 400 Labour MPs supporting Smith, the economy went smoothly, as did foreign policy. Greater ties with Europe emerged, and domestically Britain was faring well. But a small group of around 15 MPs were very slowly beginning to become a problem. Their de-facto leader was Jeremy Corbyn, a hard left-winger, along with Diane Abbot and John McDonnell. Ken Livingstone was also a member. Known as Red Labour, they were sure to be a problem when Smith stepped down. Finally, in 1998, something major happened. Smith bought to the table what was possibly the most exciting bill for his party in 50 years - the British Constitution Act.
You're right on the 40p tax rate, but it should be remembered that tuition fees had fairly broad support among centre-left politicians at this time, on the grounds that free university tuition was a subsidy to a disproportionately wealthier part of the population that could be better spent elsewhere. If people like Blunkett supported them for that reason, then there is a good case to say Smith would do too.Well, that's just plainly false, Smith would never have introduced tuition fees or left the 40p tax rate.
Hmm I don't think I and most other people would describe those egs as successful policies would you name one successful policy Blair came up withWell, that's just plainly false, Smith would never have introduced tuition fees or left the 40p tax rate.