James Stuart, Duke of Cambridge lives.

VVD0D95

Banned
James Stuart, son of James, Duke of York and his wife Anne Hyde, was born on 12th July, 1663, and was named as Duke of Cambridge and Baron of Dauntsey, a much loved and cherished prince, whilst his brother, the Duke of Kendal died in 1667, James managed to survive, and as such his survival was much applauded throughout the kingdoms, and taken as a sign of god's will being with the Stuarts. Whilst the country celebrated the survival of the Duke of Cambridge, events were on the horizon that would conspire to thrust the young Duke to the forefront of the political stage at a young age.
 
Well, I had Duke of Cambridge survive both in my first TL on this site (Life and Times of Duchess of Cumberland), where he becomes Prince of Wales upon ascension of his fther and marries to Ulrika Eleonora of Denmark (for shits, giggles and having the possibility of Karl XII expy on British throne), and we had him survive in Appolinis & Dianae, where he's "just" a First Prince of Blood but quite a prominent side character married to Sophia Charlotte of Hannover.

That's for reference information.
Now Duke of Kendal survival was never tried in any TLs worth note AFAIR.
 

VVD0D95

Banned
Well, I had Duke of Cambridge survive both in my first TL on this site (Life and Times of Duchess of Cumberland), where he becomes Prince of Wales upon ascension of his fther and marries to Ulrika Eleonora of Denmark (for shits, giggles and having the possibility of Karl XII expy on British throne), and we had him survive in Appolinis & Dianae, where he's "just" a First Prince of Blood but quite a prominent side character married to Sophia Charlotte of Hannover.

That's for reference information.
Now Duke of Kendal survival was never tried in any TLs worth note AFAIR.

Okay interesting.

I remember reading somewhere, or perhaps it was when speaking with Constantine, that Kendal's survival was unlikely due to some serious health issues.
 

VVD0D95

Banned
Following the conclusion of the Anglo-Dutch war and the subsequent Treaty of Breda, there was a feeling of some aggravation amongst Parliament as well as amongst the populace, and King Charles realised that someone would need to take the fall for this. And so, rather reluctantly agreed to have the Earl of Clarendon impeached by the House of Commons, however, before Clarendon could be brought to justice, he managed to flee the country, heading off toward France. Clarendon would soon be replaced by the Cabal, a group of ministers who would grow to be quite unpopular during the latter half of Charles II's reign, and the beginning of James II's reign.
 

VVD0D95

Banned
A question, after posting that little tidbit regarding the beginnings of the cabal, I was wondering, is there a way that Clarendon could be spared impeachment, or was that always going to happen?
 

VVD0D95

Banned
Following the exile of Clarendon in 1667, and the survival of the Duke of Cambridge, things were looking up for the royal family, King Charles was at the height of his popularity and it seemed that he could do no wrong. When Charles, sensing a chance to capitalise on this, allied with the Netherlands and Sweden against France, in the War of Devolution, though it has long been suspected that England's presence there was merely obligatory and not voluntary in some regards. Regardless, Louis XIV made peace with the triple alliance.

Charles would later send his brother the Duke of York to Versaille to negotiate a secret treaty with their cousin, this was done to try and aid Charles out of his financial woes. However, back in England, the mentorship of the Duke of Cambridge, became a heated topic, especially when he was placed into the hands of one of the Cabal, namely Ashley (later Earl of Shaftesbury) This was something that caused a lot of tension between people and the King, for it seemed that the King was finally choosing a side in that great racket. However, it seemed that the issue was moot when in late 1667 it was announced that Queen Catherine was pregnant once more.
 

VVD0D95

Banned
The birth of a son to King Charles and his wife the Queen, was greeted most enthusiastically in the three kingdoms during the beginning of 1668, the boy was named Charles for his father and grandfather, and was created Duke of Cornwall, Duke of Rothesay, Earl of Chest and Earl of Carrick as heir to the kingdom. Having a male heir from his own body greatly improved the King's mood, as it did Parliament's, for when Parliament met in 1668, they were willing to grant the King a rather sizeable sum for that year's worth expenses to go with the life grant that had been granted to him before. Parliament only met for that one meeting, for the King in a rather smart move had called it for that purpose then prorogued it. However, the beginnings of the end of that fractured unit the Cabal, were laid during the year of 1668, for Buckingham and Shaftesbury so often at loggerheads were increasingly clashing over the issues of foreign policy, with Buckingham in favour of pursuing a pro French policy to keep the Dutch at bay, whilst Shaftesbury wanted the Dutch kept on side. Furthermore, the earl's guardianship over the young Duke of Cambridge, was proving to be quite the sticking point between the man and the Duke of York, for the Duke was worried that his son was being exposed to all kinds of heretical and puritannical ideas, that would not be good for his soul.
 

VVD0D95

Banned
With regards to marriage options and realistic butterflies for this, should a legitimate daughter of Louis XIV survive into adulthood, would she be considered a more realistic prospect for marriage to James than say her cousin Anne Marie ?
 
Top