Grettir Asmundarsen
Banned
Mark said:GA, I'm confused by your arguments. For the sake of space, I've quoted only the Israeli assessment paragraph. From your own writing, you admit that Egypt had tossed the UN out of the Sinai and moved in their army, closed the straits, threatened Israel's destruction, and allied with Jordan and Syria (with Syria supporting/allowing attacks on Israel). But Israel started it to protect Saudi Arabia because of Yemen?!
Note, none of this argues against the IDF also wanted to support their deterent value. Had the Arabs (sensu lato) not been massing near the borders and forming extended alliances, their would be no need for demonstrating deterence.
My thesis was asking the question as to whether or not Israel acted within the boundaries of the Rational Actor Model (an IR term) in their attack on Egypt. My conclusion was that they were--but only in regard to Egypt. The invasions of Jordan and Syria were afterthoughts, ad actually not within the bounds of the RAM. I was up against a word limit, so I couldn't include the facts behind those in the paper. I posted this to make my points about Nasser, which were questioned from an earlier posting.
The point remains though, that Israel was in no danger of being destroyed because they were more powerful than all of the Arab belligerents combined.