They probably would be aghast at how WRONG these wierdos have it, though.
That's what's so awesome about it. They'll call these western heretics out on their bs
They probably would be aghast at how WRONG these wierdos have it, though.
So just to clarify, Mongols go east, Tuvans and their confederation go west? How will this effect the Muslim world and Eastern Europe? Will Russia become more powerful without a overly offensive and genocidal horde in their business? Same with Mesopotamia and Persia. Without the sacking of Baghdad, would Islam lose its way? I doubt the Byzantines would honestly wish to extend themselves all the way to the Tigris and Euphrates.
So just to clarify, Mongols go east, Tuvans and their confederation go west? How will this effect the Muslim world and Eastern Europe? Will Russia become more powerful without a overly offensive and genocidal horde in their business? Same with Mesopotamia and Persia. Without the sacking of Baghdad, would Islam lose its way? I doubt the Byzantines would honestly wish to extend themselves all the way to the Tigris and Euphrates.
I'd argue that russia would be VERY different without the crushing of the Kievan Rus and the ascension of the Muscovites... More of a merchant/democratic tradition, IIRC, in general.
Without the Mongols, I think the most important thing will be a fertile crescent that remains fertile, which will do alot to prevent Islam's OTL increased insularism.
Yes, if the crescent remains fertile then they could actually be alot more peaceful, not as much Jihad?
I'd argue that russia would be VERY different without the crushing of the Kievan Rus and the ascension of the Muscovites... More of a merchant/democratic tradition, IIRC, in general.