You mean HMS Ark Royal not Victorious. HMS Victorious was comisión in November 1940Graf Spee turns north, shadowed by seaplane and then the cruisers, driven into the arms of Victorious aircraft and Renown.
How would she identify the ships as Crusiers as opposed to other vessels via HE at long range?1 Graf spee used it's hydrophone's to detect the acoustic noise of three vessel's and identifie's them as british cruiser size war vessel's in the pre twilight hour's of the 13th and plot's a course away from them,
2 Useing it's hydrophone's and or radar to avoid enemy war vessel's as graf spee make's it's way safely back to germany sinking merchant vessel's here and there.
When you war game it, ammunition expenditure becomes an issue, and if the British close the fire from the light cruisers 6 inch guns can be nasty if they close.Graf Spee was spotted at 06:10 and the sunset at 20:48.
The British could overhaul and close.
That said there's a question about how much damage the British would have suffered had Graf Spee attempted to flee and to use their 11 inch guns at long range (possibly outside the range of British cruiser guns) and force the the British to sail inside of Graf Spees engagement range but outside the British engagement range.
Historically both forces sailed at each other and it was 8-11 minutes from sighting to engagement before the British opened fire although both forces were well within their theoretical maximum range.
I suspect the Germans would have seen the ammunition expenditure at long range as not being worth it in theory but in practice if dealing with the idea that this might be the last battle of Graf Spee the extra damage may have been worth it in securing escape for Graf Spee.
It still seems like a poor decision to close, the convoy would scatter, and a cruiser and 2 DDs would keep the Graf Spee busy long enough that overhauling merchant individual ships would be difficult, and it would still be easy enough to get significant damage to prevent a return to port.I recall reading, perhaps in Stern's Big Gun Battles book, that given the acceleration of a diesel powered ship, Langsdorff sighted the masts of Exeter early enough, that had he changed course he would have been over the horizon before Harwood's force would have been able to get up to speed for a pursuit. But he was looking for a convoy based on intelligence gathered from his last couple successes. So he decided to close....
sorry, yesYou mean HMS Ark Royal not Victorious. HMS Victorious was comisión in November 1940
Regardless off British losses its almost certain that in all engagements GF takes hits and is likely mission killed - which one way or another finishes GF as a threat and achieves the 8 British and French Hunting groups (of which Harwoods force is just 1) primary mission.When you war game it, ammunition expenditure becomes an issue, and if the British close the fire from the light cruisers 6 inch guns can be nasty if they close.
There is a lot of possibility of random events but the British win 2 out of 3 times.
It still seems like a poor decision to close, the convoy would scatter, and a cruiser and 2 DDs would keep the Graf Spee busy long enough that overhauling merchant individual ships would be difficult, and it would still be easy enough to get significant damage to prevent a return to port.
Also if Langsdorf ran South or East He would be closing on HMS Cumberland running North from the Falklands, Cumberland had a 2 to 3 knot advantage and was like her sisters a good sea boat, If Langsdorf ran South he would close at over 50 NM per hour East Close would be more like 20 NM per hour and that closes toward Force HGraf Spee was at her best speed (28 knots) several knots slower than the British cruisers (31 knots).
On the day of the Battle Graf Spee was well overdue for a major machinary refit and from memory I recall she could maintain about 24 knots
Given the close positions when they started at pretty much first light, had she turned tail immediately she would only have drawn out the chase for an hour or 2 at best before she would have had to turn and fight.
There was too much daylight left and she was too slow to run away.
It was always up to Harwood and not Langsdorf as to whether there would be an engagement or not and as Harwood was Royal Navy and his force had just the 'one mission' (that to find and sink raiders) it was always going to happen.
Issue at Savo was as admitted by Japanese, none of their ships had the capability to receive or identify radar signals. The USN could have and IMO should have used radarHow would she identify the ships as Crusiers as opposed to other vessels via HE at long range?
She was looking for ships and possibly a convoy to pick off and would more likely approach any HE effect than run from it otherwise she would run from any contact which rather defeats the mission and she had not previously.
Hydrophone effect is good for about 20kms perhaps further for a large convoy - but that is on a submarine moving relatively slowly
I know that Bismarck detected Hood and POW approaching them on HE before they saw them at greater range than that but those were massive Battleships at or close to 30 knots.
And Graf Sprees Radar was a Seetact type which was used as a gunnery radar not a surface search radar - it had a useful range of up to 10 NMs although typically less and given that radar emissions could be detected many times the distance that they could detect stuff* it would only be useful to range in on a target and in 1939 while a useful system the very good optics used on Graf Spee's directors were considered more accurate than Seetact.
Radar and its use was still being understood at the time and one understanding I heard was that using radar was like 2 men in a totally blacked out hall trying to find each other in order to shoot each other - both have torches - you can use the torch but the other guy is going to immediately know where you are.
Building and using Radar in 1939 is hard but detecting it is far easier.
Its one of the reasons the USN/RAAN force at 1st Savo Island did not use Radar as it would have given away their position (or certainly bearing) and their presence.
Captain Bode is often critised for this lack of use of Radar but in this decision he was probably correct as even with radar it is not 100% certain that even the Type 241 surface search set on HMAS Canberra would have detected the Japanese Ships before they were detected.
To have used Radar in the proximity of Harwoods Squadron would have given away Graf Spees location and almost certainly its identity as very few vessels were equipped with radar in 1939.
Issue at Savo was as admitted by Japanese, none of their ships had the capability to receive or identify radar signals. The USN could have and IMO should have used radar
I recall reading, perhaps in Stern's Big Gun Battles book, that given the acceleration of a diesel powered ship, Langsdorff sighted the masts of Exeter early enough, that had he changed course he would have been over the horizon before Harwood's force would have been able to get up to speed for a pursuit. But he was looking for a convoy based on intelligence gathered from his last couple successes. So he decided to close....