unprincipled peter
Donor
Much of the popular literature postulates that birth of James Francis Edward (the Old Pretender) was a major factor in touching off the Glorious Revolution. However, popular literature also shows that William and his faction in England were plotting the revolution well before the birth of James.
Does this indicate the invasion was going to happen whether the child was a boy or a girl? William wanted an invitation before attempting to usurp power. That invite didn't happen til after the birth. The male heir made it easy to take the plunge.
What if the offspring was a girl? Does the invitation still happen? I'm thinking yes, as opposition to King James was fierce. But what if it doesn't (the Immortal Seven chicken out) or is delayed by months/years? Does William launch his invasion anyhow? The support is still there, just minus the letter.
Does another female heir sap some of the support for the invasion? Enough to make things really messy, or reverse the outcome?
Does this indicate the invasion was going to happen whether the child was a boy or a girl? William wanted an invitation before attempting to usurp power. That invite didn't happen til after the birth. The male heir made it easy to take the plunge.
What if the offspring was a girl? Does the invitation still happen? I'm thinking yes, as opposition to King James was fierce. But what if it doesn't (the Immortal Seven chicken out) or is delayed by months/years? Does William launch his invasion anyhow? The support is still there, just minus the letter.
Does another female heir sap some of the support for the invasion? Enough to make things really messy, or reverse the outcome?