Kick
"Independent" nations like Iraq, Syria, Palestine and Egypt.....LOLI feel it is necessary to SHOW what the thinking of the USG was at the time. Note the date of the letter.
Just as in a similar letter sent to the other leader of another belligerent nation when Indochina's borders were violated under a pretense. (Hirohito and that letter can be found here.), the clear intent of the letter is to put the case plainly to the chief of state recipient that:
a. The United States was well aware of the bastard's intent.
b. The United States was giving clear warning it would not tolerate such an intent.
c. The ENEMY chief of state would be held accountable.
I think if there is any doubt about the question, of whether the United States would cut a slimy nefarious deal with such bastards, it is plain in black and white (^^^) that the answer was not only "No" but that there would be trials and sentences after all the blood was unnecessarily spilled when the good faith offer of diplomatic settlement was on the table with the USG as participant and an intermediary.
I do not think FDR was under any illusions. He was laying the foundations for Nurnberg and Tokyo invoking International Law specifically for such charges he prophetically saw that would be levied as part of the settlement of a WORLD WAR, which he predicts in the letter above, by the specific named nations he expected to be attacked or which were already under attack.
Can it be any clearer?
McP.