For the Republic: A History of the Second American Civil War

“The Plot Against America” (Chapter 1)

“The Plot Against America”

“Americans play to win at all times. I wouldn't give a hoot and hell for a man who lost and laughed. That's why Americans have never lost nor ever lose a war.” - George S. Patton

Screenshot (6).png

The 1932 United States Presidential election​

Alfred Emmanuel Smith had fought for twelve years to be President of the United States. When he finally achieved victory in 1932 he was left with the task of stitching up a ruined and hungry nation. Four years earlier, he lost in a landslide that had nearly torn his party in two. But then, the happy times dried up and President Herbert Hoover’s popularity imploded. It was under these terms that Smith, with the surprise death of presumptive frontrunner Franklin Roosevelt, was able to win his party’s nomination again and defeat Hoover.

Smith took the oath of office on March 4th, as the first Catholic President— a fact that made much of the country bitterly hate and distrust him. Even Hoover, widely blamed for the wholesale destruction of the U.S. economy and having overseen one of the most tumultuous terms in office since Abraham Lincoln, had made a credible showing against Smith. The new President's faith and his east coast accent made him anathema to the rural heartland. He was a devoted urban progressive who envisioned good governance as a beneficial partnership between the state, the working man, and big business. In the desperate times following the 1929 Stock Market Crash, Smith’s pushes for sensible reform satisfied nobody and infuriated many. From the angry generals watching their gallant veterans starve to the business tycoons terrified of leaving the gold standard to the fiery evangelists raving against papist influence, Smith’s country was filled with his enemies.

The failure of the proposed 20th Amendment, thanks almost entirely to anti-Catholic opposition to Smith, kneecapped the President’s ability to respond to the ongoing crises. Smith proposed a wide range of reforms to heal the nation. They fell mostly on deaf and suspicious ears. When the Glass-Steagall Act faltered in Congress because of Smith’s opposition to an insurance clause, the public blamed him for prolonging the mess he was elected to clean up. Meanwhile, another Amendment, the 21st, which would have ended America’s disastrous flirtation with Prohibition, had stalled in the states thanks to anti-Smith backlash. The many economic programs that did make it to Smith’s desk in the year of 1933 were not enough to end the American people’s woes. And what good they did was drowned out in the noise of sprawling unemployment lines and angry demagoguery.

smith.jpg

Al Smith, the 32nd President of the United States​

They did, however, make an enemy of America’s invisible branch of government: the titans of industry, who had controlled it completely for the latter half of the nineteenth century and whose influence had waned but never vanished entirely. Smith’s agenda frightened big business. With millions out of work and the employment lines stretching through whole cities, big business concluded that democracy as it stood was mostly untenable. The ultimate example of this was Smith, foisted on the nation by a rabble of immigrants, progressives, and shiftless vagrants. The inevitable result of this would be a socialist revolution as seen in Russia, or a revolution of an entirely different sort.

J. P. Morgan Jr. famously told a confidante that, “democracy has given us Al Smith, who shall surely give us inflation, which shall surely give us Bolshevism.” Of the many forces that sought to destroy Al Smith, business that was the brains of the operation. They were hardly alone, however. A fellow Catholic known for his progressive economic views, the radio broadcaster Father Charles Coughlin, broke with Smith early and decried him to his millions of listeners as a “tool of the international bankers and Judeo-Bolsheviks!” America’s then nascent and repressed communist and socialist parties also were witheringly critical of the Smith administration, calling him the "feeble peace offering of a dying system". But the most obvious obstacle for Smith was how widely he was distrusted by America’s white Protestant majority, particularly in the western and southern United States. South Carolina evangelist Bob Jones had fumed four years earlier that, “I'd rather see a saloon on every corner of the South than see the foreigners elect Al Smith president.” Little had changed— only now Americans were hungrier and more desperate than they were in 1928.

Millions of Americans feared that Smith took direct orders from the Pope, and that he would soon begin taking bloody vengeance on Protestant churches. When he won, it became common practice in many communities to openly flaunt his authority. He represented the beginning of a heinous plot against America that involved the subversion of its character and institutions and consolidation under transnational elites, including the Pope in Rome and the Bolshevik government in Moscow. As economic malaise raged on, the nation slipped out of Al Smith’s fingers.

The men that shared Morgan’s sentiment about the crossroads the nation was at had long admired the workings of fascist Italy under Benito Mussolini, which in their view had achieved order and harmony and warded off communist insurgency— at the expense of its people’s liberty, but with the stakes so high, what other options were there? More encouraging for them still was Nazi leader Adolf Hitler’s ascent as German Chancellor two months before Smith was inaugurated. Hitler rapidly consolidated power and would soon become the unquestioned dictator of Germany, a development that these men saw as especially promising. “America,” said businessman Gerald C. MacGuire, “needs a Hitler of our own. Just for a little while.” President Smith’s chief focus had been installing his government and putting the nation back to work again. He had done his best to ignore attacks on his patriotism and the unhappy mutterings of big business, who he viewed as a partner to be cooperated with and not an enemy to be destroyed, as they viewed him. He found himself isolated in many of his own government’s corridors of power— viewed as a foreigner in his own country, particularly to the United States military’s leading men. This is what convinced many of them that it was acceptable or even necessary to intervene.

GettyImages-3425760-5c4ce47446e0fb000167c6d0.jpg

European dictators Benito Mussolini (left) and Adolf Hitler (right)​

Much ink has been spilled as to when this stopped being wild talk at champagne dinners or in raging Sunday sermons and became a concerted plan to overthrow the government of the United States, but by Christmas all of the major parts and players were in place. Bankers under Morgan, industrialists under automobile titan Henry Ford, and a host of political leaders ranging from fire-breathing populists to strict conservatives were united in ousting Al Smith from the White House. And in the first weeks of January, they did exactly that. Another Bonus Army, like the one that had crippled and embarrassed Hoover, descended on Washington. As it marched, it rapidly snowballed into something much, much more than Great War veterans angry that they had been stiffed again by the government. They reached the city in full force on January 19th.

And on January 20th, Army Chief of Staff Douglas MacArthur announced to the whole country by radio that sudden developments had forced an interim government’s formation. It was not a particularly rousing speech and was almost completely devoid of details, lasting for under a minute. In fact, in the postwar period, this lead to much speculation that MacArthur had not participated in the initial coup and was only brought into the new government later. In the confusion, some even alleged that the speech was not MacArthur’s, or that the speech had not even been given at all. MacArthur, on the radio to millions of listeners, declared simply that:
In light of the emergency which has taken control of Washington D.C., I General Douglas MacArthur, Chief of Staff of the Army, have been left with no choice but to honor our Constitution and our Christian God by putting down the lawlessness and conspiracy of my own accord. Al Smith has fled Washington D.C. after it was discovered he was in league with the Pope and Moscow. In the interim, an emergency joint resolution from Congress has vested government power in me.
There was no such joint resolution. The exact events of January 19th have been heavily scrutinized and debated, with historians unlikely to ever discover the full truth. Smith was quite clear that he received many contradictory updates as to the progress of the Bonus Army’s march. He dispatched MacArthur, as President Hoover had in 1932, to keep the peace. MacArthur apparently joined the demonstrators just before sundown, and Smith fled the White House with his family and cabinet. More curious is the role of J. Edgar Hoover, Director of the Bureau of Investigation. Among those who sponsored the March on Washington, Hoover’s motives are the most difficult to discern because of the Director’s own paranoia. He was perhaps the only person in Washington who could have realistically captured Smith before he fled, which would have dramatically altered the course of world history. If Hoover was in on the planning, then how was Smith able to escape? And if Hoover was left out in the cold, then how did Smith remain unaware of the coup until it had seized the White House itself? And how did Hoover assume the leading role in MacArthur's regime he is now notorious for? Nonetheless, Hoover was instrumental in rapidly locking down the city of Washington and capturing many of its important men before they were able to grasp the full ramifications of what had happened. His services went far in establishing the new government. Most notably, Hoover arrested all nine members of the Supreme Court, even Chief Justice Charles Evan Hughes.

p10.jpg

General Douglas MacArthur, 1930​

MacArthur was a man that believed himself firmly destined for greatness. He was born to General Arthur MacArthur, who fought in the Civil War and Philippine War with distinction. MacArthur grew up in a western military family where he learned to shoot before he could read and graduated from West Texas Military Academy at the top his class, going on to serve with valor in the Great War. He was known for his flamboyant persona and disregard for civilian authority. Following his service in the Great War, MacArthur became Superintendent of West Point, and later Commander of the Philippine Department. In 1930, he became the Army's senior most officer. An aide called him, the most "flamboyantly egotistical" man he had ever met. And indeed, in the Army, MacArthur was most famous for his long-winded orations and fondness for pompous dressing. Nonetheless, he was an extremely talented commander that had proven himself many times over. And he also had political ambitions, although nobody, probably not even MacArthur himself, could have imagined where the general would be in 1934 and what place in American history he would carve for himself.

The mass psychology of the March on Washington has been covered ad nauseum, and many competing explanations have been offered for how it managed to get as far as it did. The general consensus among historians is that while MacArthur had many supporters in the general public and in high places, more importantly great fear, apathy, and confusion paralyzed the many men that were capable of stopping the putsch in its cradle. In many quarters, MacArthur’s coup certainly was welcomed. One preacher in southern Virginia praised MacArthur for, “his firmness of constitution, in saving the republic from the twin evils of romanism and Bolshevism.” And indeed, there were millions cheering Smith’s overthrow. More common, however, was muted alarm. The state governments, particularly those in the west, did not know what to make of the President’s sudden flight or the dashing MacArthur declaring his own government. Governor William H. Murray of Oklahoma said it most frankly to a member of his state’s National Guard: “We do not know where Alfred Smith is or what General MacArthur intends.”

The reaction of the military men in the coup’s opening hours and days can be genuinely bewildering to observers. In the leadup to January 19th of 1934, there is a shocking absence of serious insurrection plans or even particularly anti-Smith sentiments in what papers survived. MacArthur’s aid, Dwight D. Eisenhower, is on record screaming at his superior hours after the March on Washington. “You dumb son of a bitch,” fumed Eisenhower, according to defectors, “you just waged war on the most ancient republic on this earth! Don’t you fucking understand that this means war and revolution?” Eisenhower probably represented the majority of the military, particularly the army. But nearly all of its members had, if nothing else, respect for MacArthur’s abilities. Consequently, few generals fled Washington when President Smith suddenly did. While few openly supported the coup and many actively dreaded it, few of the Washington institutions and military hierarchies had been seriously disrupted in January of 1934. Consequently, inch by inch, the military of the freest republic in the world found themselves serving a coup. Diarist Mary Dothan, who was in Washington, recorded that “it is as if the whole nation has fallen into a stupor. Everyone agrees that Gen. Mac’s rule is benevolent or that he is a miscreant who shall surely be cast out without delay and without any trouble.”

8e6f25fa88e91fca696230d1c49a002e.jpg

The United States Capitol immediately prior to the March on Washington​

Congress was out of session, and therefore was unable to coordinate a unified response. This was intentional, as the men that orchestrated the March on Washington believed Congress would be the main obstacle to their designs— as with Smith, their strategy was to force them out and seize legitimacy through the virtue of raw control over Washington. Senator Huey Long was the first to bite, permanently fleeing to his base of power in Louisiana and rapidly assembling a council of his allies. Hiram Johnson of California did something similar, far out of both Smith and MacArthur's reach. Around a fourth of Congress remained in Washington, and these men either fled or fell under MacArthur’s control. Republican leader Charles McNary was among those that refused to flee the city, either due to underestimating MacArthur or believing such a thing was beneath a member of Congress; he was never seen again. Nonetheless, many denounced the coup in the strongest terms and immediately got to work at picking up the pieces, outside of Washington. William Borah of Idaho declared that the "Nika Rioters" would be crushed with all haste and faced no prospects but unconditional surrender.

Well before the end of January, as baffling messages raced across the country and the world, a new power ruled the seat of the republic. The National-Corporate government had no constitution, no convention of state delegates, and no official proclamation date but within days its existence was hard, established fact, far more than the rival Smith government being hectically assembled in New York. MacArthur was hastily declared President of the United States.

Under cover of darkness, Smith and his wife Katie were ferried to his home base of Albany by plane. He was received by Eleanor Roosevelt, a close friend who had succeeded her late husband as governor of the Empire State. He was more unsure than anyone what had happened— someone, something, had run him out of his palace like a disgraced emperor. No one had rushed to his defense and nobody knew what had happened. Some members of Smith's entourage patently refused to believe that MacArthur had betrayed him, while others viewed the general's acts as no more than McClellanesque insubordination and not an intentional attempt to drive Smith out of office. None suspected that a whole new regime was breathing its first breaths in the very seat of American democracy. President Smith had no way of knowing that he had been victim to an American coup, the first shot fired in the Second American Civil War.

Eleanor_Roosevelt_cph.3b16000.jpg

New York Governor A. Eleanor Roosevelt​
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone— this project has been a longtime in the making (months now), and I’m very excited to show it to you all! I’m hoping to make an update every week or so at least.

The extensive worldbuilding behind this concept was developed with my discord friend, gaysinspace, who has registered for an account here under that username and without whom this whole thing could’ve never happened.
 

“The Plot Against America”

“Americans play to win at all times. I wouldn't give a hoot and hell for a man who lost and laughed. That's why Americans have never lost nor ever lose a war.” - George S. Patton


View attachment 871770
The 1932 United States Presidential election​

Alfred Emmanuel Smith had fought for twelve years to be President of the United States. When he finally achieved victory in 1932 he was left with the task of stitching up a ruined and hungry nation. Four years earlier, he lost in a landslide that had nearly torn his party in two. But then, the happy times dried up and President Herbert Hoover’s popularity imploded. It was under these terms that Smith, with the surprise death of presumptive frontrunner Franklin Roosevelt, was able to win his party’s nomination again and defeat Hoover.

Smith took the oath of office on March 4th, as the first Catholic President— a fact that made much of the country bitterly hate and distrust him. Even Hoover, widely blamed for the wholesale destruction of the U.S. economy and having overseen one of the most tumultuous terms in office since Abraham Lincoln, had made a credible showing against Smith. The new President's faith and his east coast accent made him anathema to the rural heartland. He was a devoted urban progressive who envisioned good governance as a beneficial partnership between the state, the working man, and big business. In the desperate times following the 1929 Stock Market Crash, Smith’s pushes for sensible reform satisfied nobody and infuriated many. From the angry generals watching their gallant veterans starve to the business tycoons terrified of leaving the gold standard to the fiery evangelists raving against papist influence, Smith’s country was filled with his enemies.

The failure of the proposed 20th Amendment, thanks almost entirely to anti-Catholic opposition to Smith, kneecapped the President’s ability to respond to the ongoing crises. Smith proposed a wide range of reforms to heal the nation. They fell mostly on deaf and suspicious ears. When the Glass-Steagall Act faltered in Congress because of Smith’s opposition to an insurance clause, the public blamed him for prolonging the mess he was elected to clean up. Meanwhile, another Amendment, the 21st, which would have ended America’s disastrous flirtation with Prohibition, had stalled in the states thanks to anti-Smith backlash. The many economic programs that did make it to Smith’s desk in the year of 1933 were not enough to end the American people’s woes. And what good they did was drowned out in the noise of sprawling unemployment lines and angry demagoguery.

smith.jpg

Al Smith, the 32nd President of the United States​

They did, however, make an enemy of America’s invisible branch of government: the titans of industry, who had controlled it completely for the latter half of the nineteenth century and whose influence had waned but never vanished entirely. Smith’s agenda frightened big business. With millions out of work and the employment lines stretching through whole cities, big business concluded that democracy as it stood was mostly untenable. The ultimate example of this was Smith, foisted on the nation by a rabble of immigrants, progressives, and shiftless vagrants. The inevitable result of this would be a socialist revolution as seen in Russia, or a revolution of an entirely different sort.

J. P. Morgan Jr. famously told a confidante that, “democracy has given us Al Smith, who shall surely give us inflation, which shall surely give us Bolshevism.” Of the many forces that sought to destroy Al Smith, business that was the brains of the operation. They were hardly alone, however. A fellow Catholic known for his progressive economic views, the radio broadcaster Father Charles Coughlin, broke with Smith early and decried him to his millions of listeners as a “tool of the international bankers and Judeo-Bolsheviks!” America’s then nascent and repressed communist and socialist parties also were witheringly critical of the Smith administration, calling him the "feeble peace offering of a dying system". But the most obvious obstacle for Smith was how widely he was distrusted by America’s white Protestant majority, particularly in the western and southern United States. South Carolina evangelist Bob Jones had fumed four years earlier that, “I'd rather see a saloon on every corner of the South than see the foreigners elect Al Smith president.” Little had changed— only now Americans were hungrier and more desperate than they were in 1928.

Millions of Americans feared that Smith took direct orders from the Pope, and that he would soon begin taking bloody vengeance on Protestant churches. When he won, it became common practice in many communities to openly flaunt his authority. He represented the beginning of a heinous plot against America that involved the subversion of its character and institutions and consolidation under transnational elites, including the Pope in Rome and the Bolshevik government in Moscow. As economic malaise raged on, the nation slipped out of Al Smith’s fingers.

The men that shared Morgan’s sentiment about the crossroads the nation was at had long admired the workings of fascist Italy under Benito Mussolini, which in their view had achieved order and harmony and warded off communist insurgency— at the expense of its people’s liberty, but with the stakes so high, what other options were there? More encouraging for them still was Nazi leader Adolf Hitler’s ascent as German Chancellor two months before Smith was inaugurated. Hitler rapidly consolidated power and would soon become the unquestioned dictator of Germany, a development that these men saw as especially promising. “America,” said businessman Gerald C. MacGuire, “needs a Hitler of our own. Just for a little while.” President Smith’s chief focus had been installing his government and putting the nation back to work again. He had done his best to ignore attacks on his patriotism and the unhappy mutterings of big business, who he viewed as a partner to be cooperated with and not an enemy to be destroyed, as they viewed him. He found himself isolated in many of his own government’s corridors of power— viewed as a foreigner in his own country, particularly to the United States military’s leading men. This is what convinced many of them that it was acceptable or even necessary to intervene.

GettyImages-3425760-5c4ce47446e0fb000167c6d0.jpg

European dictators Benito Mussolini (left) and Adolf Hitler (right)​

Much ink has been spilled as to when this stopped being wild talk at champagne dinners or in raging Sunday sermons and became a concerted plan to overthrow the government of the United States, but by Christmas all of the major parts and players were in place. Bankers under Morgan, industrialists under automobile titan Henry Ford, and a host of political leaders ranging from fire-breathing populists to strict conservatives were united in ousting Al Smith from the White House. And in the first weeks of January, they did exactly that. Another Bonus Army, like the one that had crippled and embarrassed Hoover, descended on Washington. As it marched, it rapidly snowballed into something much, much more than Great War veterans angry that they had been stiffed again by the government. They reached the city in full force on January 19th.

And on January 20th, Army Chief of Staff Douglas MacArthur announced to the whole country by radio that sudden developments had forced an interim government’s formation. It was not a particularly rousing speech and was almost completely devoid of details, lasting for under a minute. In fact, in the postwar period, this lead to much speculation that MacArthur had not participated in the initial coup and was only brought into the new government later. In the confusion, some even alleged that the speech was not MacArthur’s, or that the speech had not even been given at all. MacArthur, on the radio to millions of listeners, declared simply that:

There was no such joint resolution. The exact events of January 19th have been heavily scrutinized and debated, with historians unlikely to ever discover the full truth. Smith was quite clear that he received many contradictory updates as to the progress of the Bonus Army’s march. He dispatched MacArthur, as President Hoover had in 1932, to keep the peace. MacArthur apparently joined the demonstrators just before sundown, and Smith fled the White House with his family and cabinet. More curious is the role of J. Edgar Hoover, Director of the Bureau of Investigation. Among those who sponsored the March on Washington, Hoover’s motives are the most difficult to discern because of the Director’s own paranoia. He was perhaps the only person in Washington who could have realistically captured Smith before he fled, which would have dramatically altered the course of world history. If Hoover was in on the planning, then how was Smith able to escape? And if Hoover was left out in the cold, then how did Smith remain unaware of the coup until it had seized the White House itself? And how did Hoover assume the leading role in MacArthur's regime he is now notorious for? Nonetheless, Hoover was instrumental in rapidly locking down the city of Washington and capturing many of its important men before they were able to grasp the full ramifications of what had happened. His services went far in establishing the new government. Most notably, Hoover arrested all nine members of the Supreme Court, even Chief Justice Charles Evan Hughes.

p10.jpg

General Douglas MacArthur, 1930​

MacArthur was a man that believed himself firmly destined for greatness. He was born to General Arthur MacArthur, who fought in the Civil War and Philippine War with distinction. MacArthur grew up in a western military family where he learned to shoot before he could read and graduated from West Texas Military Academy at the top his class, going on to serve with valor in the Great War. He was known for his flamboyant persona and disregard for civilian authority. Following his service in the Great War, MacArthur became Superintendent of West Point, and later Commander of the Philippine Department. In 1930, he became the Army's senior most officer. An aide called him, the most "flamboyantly egotistical" man he had ever met. And indeed, in the Army, MacArthur was most famous for his long-winded orations and fondness for pompous dressing. Nonetheless, he was an extremely talented commander that had proven himself many times over. And he also had political ambitions, although nobody, probably not even MacArthur himself, could have imagined where the general would be in 1934 and what place in American history he would carve for himself.

The mass psychology of the March on Washington has been covered ad nauseum, and many competing explanations have been offered for how it managed to get as far as it did. The general consensus among historians is that while MacArthur had many supporters in the general public and in high places, more importantly great fear, apathy, and confusion paralyzed the many men that were capable of stopping the putsch in its cradle. In many quarters, MacArthur’s coup certainly was welcomed. One preacher in southern Virginia praised MacArthur for, “his firmness of constitution, in saving the republic from the twin evils of romanism and Bolshevism.” And indeed, there were millions cheering Smith’s overthrow. More common, however, was muted alarm. The state governments, particularly those in the west, did not know what to make of the President’s sudden flight or the dashing MacArthur declaring his own government. Governor William H. Murray of Oklahoma said it most frankly to a member of his state’s National Guard: “We do not know where Alfred Smith is or what General MacArthur intends.”

The reaction of the military men in the coup’s opening hours and days can be genuinely bewildering to observers. In the leadup to January 19th of 1934, there is a shocking absence of serious insurrection plans or even particularly anti-Smith sentiments in what papers survived. MacArthur’s aid, Dwight D. Eisenhower, is on record screaming at his superior hours after the March on Washington. “You dumb son of a bitch,” fumed Eisenhower, according to defectors, “you just waged war on the most ancient republic on this earth! Don’t you fucking understand that this means war and revolution?” Eisenhower probably represented the majority of the military, particularly the army. But nearly all of its members had, if nothing else, respect for MacArthur’s abilities. Consequently, few generals fled Washington when President Smith suddenly did. While few openly supported the coup and many actively dreaded it, few of the Washington institutions and military hierarchies had been seriously disrupted in January of 1934. Consequently, inch by inch, the military of the freest republic in the world found themselves serving a coup. Diarist Mary Dothan, who was in Washington, recorded that “it is as if the whole nation has fallen into a stupor. Everyone agrees that Gen. Mac’s rule is benevolent or that he is a miscreant who shall surely be cast out without delay and without any trouble.”

8e6f25fa88e91fca696230d1c49a002e.jpg

The United States Capitol immediately prior to the March on Washington​

Congress was out of session, and therefore was unable to coordinate a unified response. This was intentional, as the men that orchestrated the March on Washington believed Congress would be the main obstacle to their designs— as with Smith, their strategy was to force them out and seize legitimacy through the virtue of raw control over Washington. Senator Huey Long was the first to bite, permanently fleeing to his base of power in Louisiana and rapidly assembling a council of his allies. Hiram Johnson of California did something similar, far out of both Smith and MacArthur's reach. Around a fourth of Congress remained in Washington, and these men either fled or fell under MacArthur’s control. Republican leader Charles McNary was among those that refused to flee the city, either due to underestimating MacArthur or believing such a thing was beneath a member of Congress; he was never seen again. Nonetheless, many denounced the coup in the strongest terms and immediately got to work at picking up the pieces, outside of Washington. William Borah of Idaho declared that the "Nika Rioters" would be crushed with all haste and faced no prospects but unconditional surrender.

Well before the end of January, as baffling messages raced across the country and the world, a new power ruled the seat of the republic. The National-Corporate government had no constitution, no convention of state delegates, and no official proclamation date but within days its existence was hard, established fact, far more than the rival Smith government being hectically assembled in New York. MacArthur was hastily declared President of the United States.

Under cover of darkness, Smith and his wife Katie were ferried to his home base of Albany by plane. He was received by Eleanor Roosevelt, a close friend who had succeeded her late husband as governor of the Empire State. He was more unsure than anyone what had happened— someone, something, had run him out of his palace like a disgraced emperor. No one had rushed to his defense and nobody knew what had happened. Some members of Smith's entourage patently refused to believe that MacArthur had betrayed him, while others viewed the general's acts as no more than McClellanesque insubordination and not an intentional attempt to drive Smith out of office. None suspected that a whole new regime was breathing its first breaths in the very seat of American democracy. President Smith had no way of knowing that he had been victim to an American coup, the first shot fired in the Second American Civil War.

Eleanor_Roosevelt_cph.3b16000.jpg

New York Governor A. Eleanor Roosevelt​
Well this is interesting. I imagine Britain and France are having heart attacks right now and Canada is beefing up its border forces.

A lot Americans are going to be fleeing to Canada and ironically enough Mexico, which I imagine quite a few Mexicans would find darkly humourous considering the reverse happened little over twenty years ago.
 
Interesting. From what I've heard elsewhere, the general US sentiment at this time towards the professional full-time military was "reluctantly tolerated" at best due to believing it as something that could bring an American Napoleon to overthrow the republic.

If that's true, that sentiment is gonna be uh...intensified TTL.
 
Gonna be interesting how Europe reacts, Germany and Italy might take this as an opportunity to test their army doctrine and vehicles as volunteers, like they did during the Spanish Civil War but they'd get this opportunity early. It might also light a fire under Britain and France asses to rearm early as they can no longer rely on America in the near future.
 
Interesting. From what I've heard elsewhere, the general US sentiment at this time towards the professional full-time military was "reluctantly tolerated" at best due to believing it as something that could bring an American Napoleon to overthrow the republic.

If that's true, that sentiment is gonna be uh...intensified TTL.
Alexis de Tocqueville said that Americans could never tolerate conscription laws and standing armies in general because the concept is simply so alien to their staunch individualistic nature. Obviously that wasn’t entirely true but yeah, they don’t like being told what to do and something like this would crank that up to eleven.
 
Gonna be interesting how Europe reacts, Germany and Italy might take this as an opportunity to test their army doctrine and vehicles as volunteers, like they did during the Spanish Civil War but they'd get this opportunity early. It might also light a fire under Britain and France asses to rearm early as they can no longer rely on America in the near future.
German and Italy will extensively support the National-Corporate regime, while the allied powers will be pretty alarmed by fascism taking over a country like the U.S. (even if it’s just part, and temporarily). Nonetheless, they’ll have sympathizers for both sides even if their governments favor Smith and the Republic.
 
"A House Divided" (Chapter 2)

“A House Divided”

"It is a simple matter before us: will our children choose their leaders by the ballot or the bullet?" - Eleanor Roosevelt​

By February, the United States had two Presidents: Al Smith in Albany and Douglas MacArthur in Washington. The March on Washington, which began as a veterans’ demonstration and rapidly snowballed into the fascist coup that deposed Smith, is the opening event of the Second American Civil War. The War was fought between the Republican faction loyal to Smith and the Constitution (derisively called the Bolsheviks, yankees, "rumpublicans", or sometimes simply “traitors” by opponents) and the National-Corporate or Natcorp regime under MacArthur (called the fascists or jackboots by Republicans). It was in the two months immediately following Smith’s escape to Albany and MacArthur’s triumphant broadcast that the battle lines took shape.

Historians have divided the United States into four distinct geopolitical zones during the War, which will be addressed in detail later. The Republicans and the Natcorps aside, Senator Huey Long rapidly established a delicate but undisputed rule over nine states in the American south under his particular brand of populism. It was held together mostly by the naked force of Long’s personality. The governments of the western states, meanwhile, where Smith had lost in a landslide, embraced a much simpler kind of cynicism. As Senator Hiram Johnson, who became their de facto spokesperson, plainly articulated: “Good people have different opinions as to the General or Smith, but it’s plain to me that our best path is neutrality until one side or another is obvious in control of the country.”

Hiram_Johnson_2.jpg

California Senator Hiram Johnson​

The possibility of U.S. states in the year 1934 abandoning the federal government in the face of a naked coup was inevitable because of the decisions both MacArthur and Smith’s respective governments made in the months of January and February. Smith, landing in Albany, immediately declared MacArthur and his partisans to be traitors and the Natcorp government to be as legitimate as a pirate ship. Both in public announcements and official directives, he ordered the military to treat MacArthur as any common criminal who had stormed the White House. “Smith and what army?” jeered one DOJ agent in a telegram. And indeed, that was the problem. To call the vast majority of American military talent supporters of the coup would be highly misleading. But it was certainly true that they were, at the very best, sluggish to go to Albany and wage war on Washington D.C. This was the source of Smith’s issues. He was bottled up in New York, his base of power, while an illegitimate President with much support among the Army and business occupied Washington and proceeded as if everything was normal.

The days following the coup were surreal for Americans everywhere. Dothan recorded that “the vast majority of persons in Washington continue about their days as usual” and that “D-Mac is seen by many as another, perhaps better President that will not have to deal with the trivialities of a Congress or an election”. In the following days, the Natcorps held fabulous parades, sent official government telegrams, and threw wads of dollar bills into cheering crowds. Meanwhile, MacArthur’s allies used their extensive control of the press and the radio to rally support for the new order. “Our choice is Christ, or the red flag of communism!” Memorably roared Coughlin. “As it was after leaving the land of Egypt that the Israelites despaired, so must we hold firm and not be given to the desert.” The problem was that the glorious new regime controlled a single city. MacArthur and Smith had very similar geopolitical problems in the March on Washington’s immediate aftermath. Neither had the power or the leverage to assert themselves across the whole country or even far outside their immediate nucleus. The men that orchestrated the March were not in contact with MacArthur any earlier than October. Post-war propaganda portrayed MacArthur as a Caesarian figure that masterminded the plot mostly on his own, but more recent research suggests that not only was MacArthur a relatively late addition, but he also had not contemplated a genuine dictatorship until Christmas or so. “MacArthur,” according historian Alan Brinkley, “believed most of his public statements immediately following the March on Washington.”

In any event, Douglas MacArthur had crossed the Rubicon and now had to destroy the main threat to his newfound power, Smith in Albany.

MacArthur, apparently thanks to the influence of Morgan, agreed that his "Vice President" would be the aging intellectual and politician Nicholas Murray Butler. Butler had been the running mate of President William Howard Taft, and was so widely respected that the New York Times had printed his Christmas greetings to the nation every year. Butler was also sympathetic to fascism, which he viewed as necessary to protect conservatism. Butler accepted, declaring that he was “honored to be a part of the great project of harmony between the classes,” to raucous crowds. Butler’s presence in D.C. was an early and major victory for the Natcorp regime. It granted them legitimacy and served as the springboard for MacArthur's next moves. He set to work building his quasi-formal cabinet, which existed entirely to enforce his edicts and at his pleasure. Members included Henry Ford, the antisemitic automobile baron who had played such an integral role in financing the March, numerous members of the Morgan clan, newspaper publisher William Randolph Hearst, a host of his fellow generals, 1924 Democratic nominee John W. Davis, and banker Thomas Lamont. Most important, however, was indisputably J. Edgar Hoover. The federal government during this period was weak enough that something like the March on Washington was possible, but it was strong enough that Hoover’s DOJ was able to purge itself of republican sympathizers in a matter of days, and quickly turn its guns on MacArthur’s enemies across the country. The Director was MacArthur's most dangerous and important enforcer by far.

1647416800803.jpg

Nicholas Murray Butler​

“I am the only man,” said Douglas MacArthur grimly to Eisenhower sometime in February, “that can save this country.”

Smith, meanwhile, had secured the immediate loyalty of New York and New England. He called Congress into session and sent out a general call for volunteers— which, astoundingly enough, was completely ignored in many corners. MacArthur fever set in across the United States, and the new regime’s adroit usage of the airwaves had much of America convinced that theirs was a temporary coup, meant only to put an end to the Catholic Smith’s treason and restore the economy. Even elected officials were not safe from the madness. “MacArthur,” reasoned Montana Representative Joseph P. Monaghan, “is better as President than not.” Fanatical loyalty to MacArthur and his regime was not widespread during the War’s early days. Rather, most Americans viewed MacArthur with apathy. “Smith’s medicine has failed us after all,” wrote a Kentuckian. A Kansan was more blunt: “Why should I fight for the Pope against Mac?”

With much of the nation successfully convinced that he was indeed an emperor in exile, Smith was left with limited options. These views were articulated to him by the two highest-ranking generals who found themselves in Albany. The first was Smedley Butler, the most decorated marine in U.S. history. Remarkably, Butler had been business’s first candidate for leading the March on Washington despite his open affiliation with leftist causes. Butler had reported on this to the McCormack-Dickenstein Committee, whose investigation was ongoing when the government was overthrown. Butler told Smith very plainly that the iron was hot, and if he allowed MacArthur to continue to act as President he’d quickly become one and become impossible to dislodge. The other was George C. Marshall, a key player in the Great War’s Meuse-Argonne Offensive but at that moment notable for being the highest ranking soldier to come to Albany. Marshall’s advice to the President was to rebuild the government in Albany; MacArthur would certainly come for him, but with a firm hold on the northeast, it was possible to repel MacArthur even outgunned and with inferior numbers. MacArthur, Marshall reasoned, would be unable to project power to the Pacific Coast or into the Deep South. Therefore, if Smith held his current position, MacArthur would be very weak in the long term. This, true, would put the nation in bona fide interregnum and war and concede that Smith had indeed been overthrown, but after months of warfare Smith’s faction would inevitably gain the upper hand over D.C. Marshall warned Smith, “Mac has more than the United States right now, and refusing to hunker down means he will kill you and conquer it.”

800px-SmedleyButler.jpeg

Smedley Butler​

Smith followed Marshall’s advice, which perhaps is the most controversial decision made by the man who was America’s most controversial President during his lifetime. The so-called “Marshall Plan” as its detractors called it would be Albany’s strategy for the duration of the war. It was a tacit and humiliating admission, seeking not to retake Washington from the coup immediately but mostly to protect the Great Lakes and Northeast wherever possible, and eventually break MacArthur through weeks if not months of Civil War. And as Smith’s pleas for help went ignored and he buckled down with what he had in the northeast, another peculiar emotion emerged that strengthened Douglas MacArthur’s regime: mockery. Papers from the Atlantic to the Pacific, sometimes in league with MacArthur’s business allies, ridiculed Smith as a beggar President while anti-MacArthur papers ridiculed him as a coward and a fool that had single handedly surrendered the United States to fascism.

The country did not think of itself as at war yet, and even in the heart of Natcorp Washington censorship hadn’t yet been introduced in any major capacity. Among foreign dignitaries, Germany and Italy were preaching war. “General MacArthur has begun the struggle in America,” a German newspaper wrote gleefully, “and can now be called his country’s great leader in the quest against mongrelization and Jewry!” The former Allied powers, most importantly Great Britain, were not any quicker than the United States in grasping the full implications of the MacArthur regime’s sudden emergence. While the United Kingdom and France had their fair share of fascist sympathizers their governments were unanimous in supporting Smith, at least nominally. Confusion ruled, with the British foreign minister sending an angry telegram about the coup— to Washington D.C. Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald’s private papers indicate that he and most of his cabinet did not believe that the March on Washington represented anything more than a “Nika Riot”.

Meanwhile, Smith had called Congress into an emergency session, viewing them as the first step to tying the nation back together. His calculation here was correct. While hardly unanimous, Congress was furious at the loss of D.C. and overwhelmingly opposed MacArthur, even if for some it was simply a matter of protecting their own power. Over the next few months, around sixty percent of it would slowly trickle to session. With the help of Vice President John Nance Garner, a conservative southerner that had long distrusted Smith but who also evaded Hoover’s nets and followed faithfully to Albany, Smith contemplated how he would go about rebuilding the country. “I intend,” he told Katie, “to live to see America rebuilt.”

john-nance-garner-1.jpg

Vice President John Nance Garner, a.k.a. "Cactus Jack"​

MacArthur and Hoover correctly believed that killing the rump Albany government was the next step to securing their power. The DOJ and the U.S. armored cavalry, the ones that were MacArthur’s staunchest loyalists, anyway, were assembled to march into Albany and disperse whatever the pitiably weak Smith still had left. “We’ve got to kill this thing quickly,” MacArthur told John Davis. “If not, we’ll have years of Americans dying.” They assembled a battalion of under three hundred, intending to roll through New York by tank and apprehend the President of the United States like any common criminal. The goal was to avoid the many, many headaches associated with invading the state of New York, which MacArthur accurately predicted would become a “goddamned mess”. Like Smith, MacArthur had a logistics problem. The entire United States military numbered little more than 100,000 men in 1934. MacArthur probably had no more than 30,000 immediately on hand, not counting those involved in the March on Washington. In any event, it was not enough to wage a Civil War and doing so would require a buildup.

The yeomen recruits the U.S. military had traditionally relied upon in times of emergency were initially nowhere to be found for either side, but particularly in the northeast where there was still a foot of snow on the ground. Smith was forewarned of the column’s advance, but knew of little he could do beyond defend himself. Retreat from Albany to Boston or his native New York City would doom the country. He, nonetheless, had no army at all. It would be Governor Roosevelt, not the United States Army, that stopped MacArthur. Roosevelt quickly assembled the national guard and demonstrated an uncanny ability to sniff out potential traitors. “If Hoover’s rats were there they didn’t last a damn second after she called us in,” recalled one captain. When MacArthur’s tanks crossed the New York border on February 7th, hundreds of New York national guardsmen were waiting for them. At the little town of Forestburgh, the guard used small artillery and the local terrain to destroy the Natcorp armor. There were thirty two dead between the two sides. And with a scorching radio broadcast by the Governor less than an hour after the fighting, the Second American Civil War had begun.

“MacArthur fever”, which wasn’t just support for MacArthur’s regime but also the mentality that it was somehow a trifling issue that was to be ignored or tolerated or compared to Smith, dried up that day as the United States realized that it was at war. Nearly everyone agrees that Douglas MacArthur, who has escaped reliable documentation following the March, was perhaps the only member of the Natcorp government that was more sullen than angry. “God fucking dammit,” MacArthur allegedly told major Jens Doe. “Now they’ve done themselves in. I’m going to have to conquer them.” The Natcorp press flagrantly refused to report on the Forestburgh setback, but MacArthur had stopped being amusing to Washington D.C.’s denizens. On February 9th, there was a large-scale riot in the sole city under MacArthur’s control— he put it down brutally, as he had in July of 1932. MacArthur personally took charge of two thousand some soldiers, who quickly crushed the unrest with bayonets. They put the city under lockdown, where it would remain for the duration of the war. DOJ agents rushed through the city on horseback or in plainclothes, to terrorize not merely suspected agitators but anyone who could be trouble down the road. “The DOJ dragged away my husband,” wrote Mary Dothan very plainly. She would not see Chester Dothan, a smalltime reporter, again. The crackdown was not merely a reaction to the riot, but because MacArthur had concluded what he would do soon after he received news of Forestburgh: he would assemble whatever allies he had, establish a firm base of power wherever he could, and then capture Albany at the head of an actual military offensive.

general-douglas-macarthur-1880-1964-everett.jpg

Douglas MacArthur in military regalia​

MacArthur took what forces he had— certainly above 25,000, excluding what was left to keep D.C. under his thumb— and rapidly got to work spreading his rule. He dispatched Adjutant General James C. Dozier from Fort Jackson to establish control over the south with around a third of his forces, beginning with Virginia. MacArthur himself went to Maryland. Both of these were largely bloodless takeovers, as there was at that point no rival faction in America south of Albany that had access to the type of armor MacArthur did. This and the Natcorps’ own sympathizers in the states they encountered allowed them to rapidly take control of the area surrounding D.C. and put the state civilian authorities under close supervision. His goal became to lock down the border states and the Great Lakes to create a “wall” with which New York could be rapidly and hopefully bloodlessly snuffed out. It also allowed MacArthur to begin raising his army, mostly through his allies’ enthusiastic campaigning and the economic stagnation the border states had endured. MacArthur probably raised over a hundred thousand new recruits within two months, exponentially increasing the size of the Natcorps' military.

Meanwhile, he enacted the domestic regressions he'd been made dictator to and righted the sins of the Smith Era. MacArthur ordered the absorption of all labor unions into the Department of Labor, which was reorganized under General and close friend Hugh S. Johnson. Strikes, now, would be illegal and the National-Corporate State would mediate all disputes. Labor leaders too would fall under the DOJ's purview, marking the beginning of one of American history's most horrifying chapters. The fledgling programs Al Smith had enacted to relieve the nation’s poor would have to go, too, as they threatened the sanctity of business. MacArthur had them phased out in favor of attractive benefits for those that enlisted in the U.S. Army, a bitter pill that he ensured was sugarcoated in outright lies for his subjects’ benefit. MacArthur and his clique reorganized the military rapidly and effectively. It’s thought that out of the 100,000 some U.S. Army regulars before the March on Washington, they split for MacArthur around two to one, mostly thanks to their commanders’ more uniform support for him. Many of these, however, were in the Philippines or in Latin America and the U.S. Navy ended up splitting more evenly. MacArthur paid little attention to domestic affairs outside of the war, usually leaving it to his undefined and marginalized cabinet to sort matters out.

Shortly after the disturbance on the 9th, MacArthur secretly had the Supreme Court evacuated from the city, ostensibly for their own safety. In reality Hoover was ordered to gun them down in the Virginia countryside. The nine most esteemed minds in the nation quietly met their end in ditches and wouldn't be discovered until the war's end. Many, many more would join them after MacArthur invaded New York.

16973305792_41ee22030b.jpg

Snow in Albany, New York​
 
Just so you all know, I intend to go into quite a bit more detail over the next few updates. The next one will be about the war situation in New York for the duration of the year and Smith’s efforts to piece the government back together. The one after that will tell the Natcorps’ side of the story. After that, I’ll finally explain exactly what’s going on in the south. I’ll say though that when I write these I almost always run out of space before I cover my topic completely, so fair warning there!
 

ExamoorHorn

Banned
Sorry but this is just way too much way too fast.

How exactly has Smith managed to fuck up so hard so fast that the Bussiness Plot people strike in 1934 like that when OTL they barely had more than idle talk going before someone made the worst judgement of character ever and told Smedley Butler the idea not realizing how he would react?

The Catholic angle is interesting and does play into some of the issues that would have faced a catholic president in the 1930s but it is nowhere near enough to push for a total coup like this.

Even FDRs notably garbage and authoritarian fascist-like commie-pandering New Deal had managed to coddle people a little bit and he had been rolling his wheelchair over just as many toes as Smith did here. And he never had a coup against him.

Either there is a lot of context missing or the PODs start earlier to make the Depression far worse, kinda like with Kaiserreich where the war loans never got paid and a crash in 1925 before the Black Monday.
 
Oh this is interesting. Terrifying, but interesting. I had an idea of a timeline called "Browns" or "Last Days", but that never materialized. It had a similar idea of a Macarthurite coup.
 
Sorry but this is just way too much way too fast.

How exactly has Smith managed to fuck up so hard so fast that the Bussiness Plot people strike in 1934 like that when OTL they barely had more than idle talk going before someone made the worst judgement of character ever and told Smedley Butler the idea not realizing how he would react?

The Catholic angle is interesting and does play into some of the issues that would have faced a catholic president in the 1930s but it is nowhere near enough to push for a total coup like this.

Even FDRs notably garbage and authoritarian fascist-like commie-pandering New Deal had managed to coddle people a little bit and he had been rolling his wheelchair over just as many toes as Smith did here. And he never had a coup against him.

Either there is a lot of context missing or the PODs start earlier to make the Depression far worse, kinda like with Kaiserreich where the war loans never got paid and a crash in 1925 before the Black Monday.
'Fascist like commie pandering New Deal?'
 
Top