Invading by sea over longer distances is an even worse idea.Much of the discussion here has made the (not unreasonable) assumption of a cross-channel invasion. Maybe these craft could be used to attack from unexpected vectors. For example, a rapid assault from Norway into Northumberland, or from the German or Dutch coast on Norfolk. Perhaps a simultaneous approach in an attempt to swamp the British with landing sites. Might make a good movie, but still doesn’t change the result though.
Maybe they can take the Shetlands first and use that as a build up area and forward base.Much of the discussion here has made the (not unreasonable) assumption of a cross-channel invasion. Maybe these craft could be used to attack from unexpected vectors. For example, a rapid assault from Norway into Northumberland, or from the German or Dutch coast on Norfolk. Perhaps a simultaneous approach in an attempt to swamp the British with landing sites. Might make a good movie, but still doesn’t change the result though.
Maybe they can take the Shetlands first and use that as a build up area and forward base.
Maybe they can take Ellis Island first. We are innocent german refugees and our ekhronoplanes are simple Kraft durch Freude ships.Maybe they can take the Shetlands first and use that as a build up area and forward base.
Given how useless and expensive ekranoplans were and remain, it's surprising no one in the Third Reich had conceived them and then wasted an enormous amount of resources to build some half-working model just in time for it to get strafed by some bemused American or British pilot and for the wreck to be captured by an equally bemused Soviet tank commander. But we would have some fun model kits now. But yeah, Sealion is still impossible, even if the Luftwaffe (or is it the Kriegsmarine) have a Kornweihe of their own.Realistically Sealion was basically impossible without asb but hypothetically about if they had ekhronoplanes the channel is only 26 miles so the extra fuel consumption shouldn't effect them as much?
Better still, the Frisian islands.Or perhaps the Falklands. No one will expect that.
350 miles an hour is fast by WW2 fighter standard. A 1930s Wing in Ground Effect aircraft built as a transport will certainly be slower both due to the level of drag inherent in a relatively boxy transport plane and due to the much lower power available to throw at the problem than in the 1960s-80s (likely 2-4 800-1200 HP class piston engines vs multiple turboprops and turbofans each with >10,000 HP). The engine power available will also limit practical cargo/personnel lift, rather than being able to deliver a company of infantry or 20 tons of cargo you're likely looks something more like a platoon or five tons of cargo (and that's if you get the 4x 1200 HP engines rather than 2x800 HP...), and you're certainly not gonna be able to move tanks and trucks by the dozen to hundreds. So, you're Erkanoplans are probably limited to landing light infantry only.350 miles the prototypes speed from the 50s over the 26 miles is 4 minutes but since no jets engines I think its fair to at least double the type for any hypothetical
make in an "88" I remember a poster here who in one of these threads was convinced that RN destroyers would be scared off by 88's nailed to coal bargesArmoured bicycles with 15" guns.
I never get this one, the Vikings managed amphibious assaults on the British islands perfectly well !
Aha! My brilliant idea solves that problem. One eliminates the need for extra takeoff engines by launching them down ski ramps off the Cap Blanc Nez chalk cliffs. These will totally not launch half the planes directly into the water; nor - since one can simply paint them white - will they be noticed during construction by artillery spotters in Dover for whom they are within easy range.One 'postive' of ground effekt vehicles is, that the main power is 'only' needed at the start. Once in flight most of the engines can be shut down.
Because we aren't yet worthy of them.Quick question. If ekranoplans are so wonderful, why is nobody using them?
The OTL attitude to other occupied countries appeared to involve a lot of not caring if the local population went hungry or starved. I can't see why they'd make an exception for Britain.even assuming the Germans win in Britain, how do they feed it?
Britain relied otl on food imports for the empire and elsewhere that will not be coming.
What do the Germans do with the British with a collapsing economy and starving due to a lack of imports?
What do the Germans do with the island of Ireland?
They will not want the being used by the Americans as a base to invade from.
All of this would use the reserve of oil the Germans intend to use for the invasion of the Soviet Union.
Not only is sealion asb it is not even desirable from a German point of view.
The best outcome for Germany is Britain coming to terms and withdrawing from the war without having to invade and occupy the country.
I think that's the point.I never get this one, the Vikings managed amphibious assaults on the British islands perfectly well !
See I first thought (as in the viking is telling the later guys what they should have done), but he look really depressed about it and dinghies doesn't make much sense as a suggestion in general or for a vikingI think that's the point.
The Vikings never took all of England.I never get this one, the Vikings managed amphibious assaults on the British islands perfectly well !
And some 1000 lb bombs from RAF /CCGood morning harbourmaster, today's delivery of 15" shells is just about to arrive, free of charge and with the compliments of the Royal Navy.