It wasn't a crazy guy, there really was concern that some arch-segregationists would attempt something. This is why the motorcade was cancelled.
Obviously the entire Civil Rights movement would have taken a different direction if the segregationists actually killed the President. Especially if the VP at the time had been a southern Senator.
Hmm, do you think that the Vietnam advisors would have escalated into war? LBJ wasn't the most placid guy.The Civil Rights Act would've passed earlier, in perhaps '64 or '65 (LBJ was pretty good at twisting people's arms to get what he wanted in the Senate, and he would continue to do that as President). LBJ would've probably continued to send advisors to Vietnam instead of withdrawing them as JFK had planned at the end of 1963.
Hmm, do you think that the Vietnam advisors would have escalated into war? LBJ wasn't the most placid guy.
For one, Israel might get nuclear weapons faster; indeed, Lyndon Johnson struck me as being more pro-Israel than JFK was.Apparently, there was this crazy guy who was plotting an assassination attempt of Kennedy in Dallas in 1963. What if it had happened and John Kennedy had died in Dallas?
I think he was referring to some fellow killed by police in early 1964, who apparently talked about killing the President in Dallas before the motorcade was cancelled. Apparently, he was a Marine who had defected to the Soviet Union a few years earlier. Can't remember his name though.It wasn't a crazy guy, there really was concern that some arch-segregationists would attempt something. This is why the motorcade was cancelled.
I don't think we would have gotten Universal Healthcare though. It took LBJ dying in office for Humphrey to get it though and strengthening the civil rights acts.A Johnson Presidency four years earlier would've been something worth seeing. I think we'd have had a stronger and earlier Civil Rights ACT and also a stronger Voting Rights Act, and we also would've had Medicare and Medicaid in 1965 instead of 1970.
True. Boy did we have A LOT of One Term Presidents after JFK. It wasn't until Howard Baker (1985-1993) that we got a two term President.I don't think we would have gotten Universal Healthcare though. It took LBJ dying in office for Humphrey to get it though and strengthening the civil rights acts.
Another interesting thing would be possibly Regan getting elected sooner then 1976. But at the same time I see Bobby running sooner with his brother dead, instead of beating Reagan in 1980
1964: JFK/LBJ
1968: LBJ/HHH
1972: HHH/Gore
1976: Regan/Rockefeller
1980: RFK/Carter
If you're talking about Lee Harvey Oswald, I don't see how he could pull it off. The reason radical segregationists were considered a threat was because they were well-organized enough in East Texas to put together a conspiracy and (allegedly) had some pretty deep connections with local law enforcement. For Oswald to kill Kennedy as a lone gunman, there'd need to be a serious lapse in security. The story sounds so incredible I dunno how readily people would believe it. So I'm sure you'd get some entertaining conspiracy theories ITTL.I think he was referring to some fellow killed by police in early 1964, who apparently talked about killing the President in Dallas before the motorcade was cancelled. Apparently, he was a Marine who had defected to the Soviet Union a few years earlier. Can't remember his name though.
Technically Humphrey served half of LBJ's term.True. Boy did we have A LOT of One Term Presidents after JFK. It wasn't until Howard Baker (1985-1993) that we got a two term President.
Technically Humphrey served half of LBJ's term.
He served a year and a half of Johnson's term (Johnson died of a heart attack in July of '71), but was still only elected once. Had it not been for the cancer though, I do think he could've narrowly beaten Reagan in '76. McGovern proved to be a disaster, it still baffles me Gore lost the nomination to him.Technically Humphrey served half of LBJ's term.
Gore had baggage of a history of not completely supporting civil rights. He was a senator from a southern state, the reason Humphrey chose him.He served a year and a half of Johnson's term (Johnson died of a heart attack in July of '71), but was still only elected once. Had it not been for the cancer though, I do think he could've narrowly beaten Reagan in '76. McGovern proved to be a disaster, it still baffles me Gore lost the nomination to him.
Still. It's amazing that Reagan was the only living President from 1978-1981, when RFK took over.Gore had baggage of a history of not completely supporting civil rights. He was a senator from a southern state, the reason Humphrey chose him.
Reagan picking Edward Brooke was a real good choice getting moderates over to the GOP, especially after 16 years of democratic rule.
I would t say he did that good, okay but not good enough to get a second term. Baker crushed him in '84 when the economy failed to recover from the '82 recession.I'm happy RFK did such a good job for his terms and lived for so long in our tl I get the nagging feeling he too would be assassinated, then again two Dead Kennedys might not be very plausible IMHO