DBWI: Ceasar Doesn't Conquer Britainnia?

OTL, Julius Ceasar was a semi-obscure governor and general, who conquered most of gaul' major areas, and all of Britainia. He was extremely popular with his men and Rome as a whole, but he never was able to go for a second consulship, as he was killed in an expedition to Caeledonia.

Britannia Major and Hibernia, while not the most economically vital centers of Roman history would go on to provide some of the fiercest soldiers to the empire, and become heavily urbanized. This is why British is closer to Latin than most other languages in Romantic Europe, witch exception to italian of course.

This urbanization meant the celtic and Romano-British were able to repel a lot of invasions targeting them over the centuries as the Empire fell.

But what if Ceasar never conquered Britain? I imagine it would fall eventually, it was raiding rome pretty bad after Gaul was conquered. But if it's not a general's passion project, I doubt it takes the priority to develop of otl, especially with Pompey's ambitions. Speaking of Pompey, would Ceasar have the popularity with his men to oppose Pompey, or would he still become Dictator?
 

Dolan

Banned
Caesar actually owe much of his success to Crassus' financings, and he is practically loyal to the Crassus family.

His son, Marcus Julius Brittanicus managed to keep his father's post as Governor of Brittania, and Gens Julia as a whole moves there and keep being influential rulers, even after the third sack of Rome.
 
British Language?!? The language is called Brittanic after Brittania, or Loegrian for Loegria if you believe the stories of the Cyrmic peoples who still inhabit the western portions of the isles and the legend of Artorius.
 
British Language?!? The language is called Brittanic after Brittania, or Loegrian for Loegria if you believe the stories of the Cyrmic peoples who still inhabit the western portions of the isles and the legend of Artorius.
Sorry, it's called British in French.
 
Actually... if Ceasar hadn't conquered Britainnia, would rome have even made it to the 460s? Britannia provided so many soldiers used to repel barbarians and its ports were guarded by so many ships that it was practically unassailable.

Come the 460s and Italy had fallen and gaul had been lost, like most of hispania, depriving Britainnia of markets. The governors had to decommission several fleets to get the economy back on track.

But without britainia, that's entire legions simply nonexistent, thousands of soldiers never provided, and how many raids all the more devastating.
 
Top