CS Victory: US Culture?

I think the US would be considerably more leftist. For one, the most conservative region of the country would of course be gone. Perhaps even more importantly, without a great migration the north would be much more homogeneously European, which would remove the barrier of racism against working class unity.
 
I think the US would be considerably more leftist. For one, the most conservative region of the country would of course be gone. Perhaps even more importantly, without a great migration the north would be much more homogeneously European, which would remove the barrier of racism against working class unity.

it mgiht not go so leftist...after having half their country secede and (if brtiian and france got involved) being interferred with by foreign powers, it might make the us pissed off...either way got at least a generation fo vengeful people
 
I think the US would be considerably more leftist. For one, the most conservative region of the country would of course be gone. Perhaps even more importantly, without a great migration the north would be much more homogeneously European, which would remove the barrier of racism against working class unity.

it mgiht not go so leftist...after having half their country secede and (if brtiian and france got involved) being interferred with by foreign powers, it might make the us pissed off...either way got at least a generation fo vengeful people

I think both of these statements can probably be true. Yes, there will likely be nationalism/revanchism in the USA, but it will fade in time, and in part it will fade because of immigration because immigrants and their descendents won't have any memory of the old Union and won't be hugely invested in restoring it.

Instead of race, I suspect the great dividing lines ITTL's USA will be class and ethnicity, with divisions between WASP-y types whose ancestors were in America before the war and working-class white ethnics who came later. Assuming a two-party system remains in effect, this division might translate into the division between who supports which political party.
 

Wolfpaw

Banned
weve being over this...slavery was not viable forever in the csa, and eventually you would see emancipation, a civil rights movement, and black culture becoming the "forbidden fruit of the south" til its widely regarded as part of the culture...itd be slower, but itd still happen
I think it's far more likely to see the CSA implode rather than give blacks anything approaching civil rights.
 
I'm pretty sure the USA wouldn't allow blacks to come up north if the CSA had won, especially since most of them would still be slaves (or essentially slaves) and it's not like they were coming up by droves before the Civil War. Traveling into the USA would be even harder now with a border that likely stops any Underground Railroads.

While the south will invariably do everything in its power to keep its slaves within its borders, I don't exactly see the underground railroad ending. Blacks will be unpopular, no northern politician in their right mind would advocate laws repatriating them to the CSA. Consequently, a steady stream of blacks will flee bondage, and seek a better life in the north. Most of these refugees will likely end up in the Midwestern industrial cities, Chicago being the foremost of them. Theirnumbers will certainly be smaller than the Great Migration, but said emigration will nevertheless continue for as long as the South is governed by a white supremacist ideology.

As far as Yankee black culture goes, I imagine there to be a rift between the "Gentile" Harlem and east coast blacks who were freed for generations, and those in Chicago whose memories of slavery and oppression were far more recent.
 

Wolfpaw

Banned
As far as Yankee black culture goes, I imagine there to be a rift between the "Gentile" Harlem and east coast blacks who were freed for generations, and those in Chicago whose memories of slavery and oppression were far more recent.
Philadelphia is a good template to look at here, where the genteel descendents of freedmen pursued white-collar careers (doctors, lawyers), were HUGE into Booker T. Washington's ideas of "pull yourself up" rather than Du Bois's call for equality, and largely looked down on the poor blacks moving up from the South and taking whatever work they could get (street sweepers, garbagemen, servants, etc.)
 
I find it to be believable that the US would have strong anti-British/French feelings if they both helped the CSA. But I wonder what US relations would be like with both those countries if the CSA won without either getting involved.

Also I'm trying to do a CSA victory TL that involves a small amount of help from the French who help break the US naval blockade and start trading with the CSA will Britian continues a neutral stance. Could anyone tell me what kind of relations might exist between the US, Britain, and France in such a TL? Especially if Nap III is still dethroned after the Franco-Prussian war.
 
I think the US would be considerably more leftist. For one, the most conservative region of the country would of course be gone. Perhaps even more importantly, without a great migration the north would be much more homogeneously European, which would remove the barrier of racism against working class unity.

Really there's no way to be sure after all. California had their anti-Chinese riots and didn't care at all about their chinese citizens. While Chicago, New York, and Boston were all very unfriendly towards european immigrants. America was close at times to going towards a Right wing anti-immigrant state. There's no butterfly law that doesn't prevent that from happening just because the South sucedes.
 
Really there's no way to be sure after all. California had their anti-Chinese riots and didn't care at all about their chinese citizens. While Chicago, New York, and Boston were all very unfriendly towards european immigrants. America was close at times to going towards a Right wing anti-immigrant state. There's no butterfly law that doesn't prevent that from happening just because the South sucedes.

The region of the country which was most anti-immigrant was the South...
 

Wolfpaw

Banned
Also I'm trying to do a CSA victory TL that involves a small amount of help from the French who help break the US naval blockade and start trading with the CSA will Britian continues a neutral stance. Could anyone tell me what kind of relations might exist between the US, Britain, and France in such a TL? Especially if Nap III is still dethroned after the Franco-Prussian war.
Nappy's entire FP towards the ACW was "Don't do anything without Britain's full support."

So, I'd recommend you have Britain break the blockade (they're really the only ones who can) and have France tag along, rather than the other way around.
 
Philadelphia is a good template to look at here, where the genteel descendents of freedmen pursued white-collar careers (doctors, lawyers), were HUGE into Booker T. Washington's ideas of "pull yourself up" rather than Du Bois's call for equality, and largely looked down on the poor blacks moving up from the South and taking whatever work they could get (street sweepers, garbagemen, servants, etc.)

Yeah, which was somewhat ironic. Dubois came from a prominent freedman family and advocated creating an equal African American political/intellectual/economic elite whereas, Washington was born a slave and preached a program of self-improvement, entrepreneurship, and political non-participation.
 

Wolfpaw

Banned
Yeah, which was somewhat ironic. Dubois came from a prominent freedman family and advocated creating an equal African American political/intellectual/economic elite whereas, Washington was born a slave and preached a program of self-improvement, entrepreneurship, and political non-participation.
I dunno, that sorta makes sense to me.

Du Bois: "Wow; this is a bunch of horseshit. Things gotta change ASAP."

Washington: "If I can do it, you can, too!"
 
The region of the country which was most anti-immigrant was the South...

I don't think so, for a while Chinese immigrants were totally outlawed. This was mainly due to the Californian whites' not southerners. Also alot of the anti-immigrant phobia was also rolled into the Red Scares of the early 1900s.
 
I don't think so, for a while Chinese immigrants were totally outlawed. This was mainly due to the Californian whites' not southerners. Also alot of the anti-immigrant phobia was also rolled into the Red Scares of the early 1900s.

Thats true, the 19th century was racist. I believe they were literly called the "Anti-Chinese Laws" Nevertheless, the bedrock of American nativism was in the South whose citizens were proud of their pure WASP heritage and fearful of outsiders who might taint it. Without their political clout, the strength of nativism is greatly diminished.
 
Last edited:
The USA in all probability winds up sharply more like Canada and the European states of its time than the Confederacy. Without the Southern states that were in the old Confederacy it embraces industrialization and capitalism on a much more sweeping fashion while the absence of the reactionary planter elite prompts the emergence of Social Democracy, Socialist, and Communist movements as *the* challenge to the elite. The USA now has every reason for a larger land army, will be orienting itself against slavery and to some extent for greater racial equality in its own territory, and the more the CSA degenerates into a basket case, the less the USA will actually consider a full-fledged re-absorption of the Confederacy unless it has no choice. The CSA will probably wind up surviving in the fashion of Zimbabwe and North Korea, given money to avoid its collapse and the ensuing but inevitable disintegration.

Thus the USA winds up more militarized than IOTL (if for nothing else than the desire to AVOID a war caused by the inevitable attempts by slaves to run over the US-CS border and the inevitable slavecatcher raids that follow), but more European-style than IOTL in terms of political situations and challenges (industrializing, democracy, no giant agrarian caste system stuck in an 1880s timewarp into the 20th Century), and in all probability as the CSA proves to be an economic sinkhole keeping one eye on its rickety former cousin without focusing too much on the Confederacy at all.
 
i like how everyone automatically assumes that in the confederacy, black people will forever be slaves...

weve being over this...slavery was not viable forever in the csa, and eventually you would see emancipation, a civil rights movement, and black culture becoming the "forbidden fruit of the south" til its widely regarded as part of the culture...itd be slower, but itd still happen

The OTL CSA refused to scrap slavery in any meaningful sense when it was in the process of being conquered and was by the end whatever territory Lee's army was on at that precise moment. An ATL CSA that wins a shorter war will abolish slavery the day Hell freezes over and not a moment before. What will, however, change is that the plantations won't last forever. The CSA will also have *a* free black minority which people usually forget about.

And there will be a Civil Rights movement in any ATL CSA the moment there's Anarcho-Capitalist movements in any ATL USSR.
 
I agree, there were already freeborn blacks in the CSA the institution wouldn't last forever.

There were always free blacks in the states that became the Confederacy. The institution will last forever, whether or not the plantations do is a different question.
 
I had wondered about the West coast. Look at this map.

genusmap.php


Would California, Nevada, and Oregon try to break off from the US if the CS won?
 
Top