Joseph Wurtenbaugh, author of A Prophet Without Honor: A Novel of Alternative History, makes a difference between what he writes and and what most of us go for:
I apologize for having given such a large amount of quoted matter, but he only put it up on his Facebook page, which I don't think people want to link to. If the Moderators think I have overindulged I will try to do the right thing.
However . . . what do you think of his distinction? Is he making a real case, or merely quibbling? Or is this a case of "Uchronian fiction" or some other renaming?
If anyone likes I will put up my review of A Prophet Without Honor. I liked the book but had some comments about his historical background.
‘A Prophet Without Honor’ is subtitled ‘A Novel of Alternative History’ because there is no better genre description at present. But the book is actually a novel of what might be called ‘contrafactual hisrory’. ‘Alternative history’ is exemplified by Philip Dick’s ‘Man in the High Castle’ and the Harry Turtledove novels. There are strong elements of science fiction and even fantasy in such books. There is little or no attempt to root the plot in the realities of actual history.
‘Contrafactual history’ is developed on far narrower and more realistic premises. Philip Roth’s book ‘The Plot Against America’ is one such, as is Stephen Carter’s ‘The Impeachment of Abraham Lincoln’. Roth’s contrafactual history is intended to show just how strong the isolationist elements were in United States politics before the Second World War. Carter shows off the complexity of post-Civil War politics. Both develop plausible scenarios out of the actual history of the period. Neither could be fairly characterized as science fiction or fantasy.
I apologize for having given such a large amount of quoted matter, but he only put it up on his Facebook page, which I don't think people want to link to. If the Moderators think I have overindulged I will try to do the right thing.
However . . . what do you think of his distinction? Is he making a real case, or merely quibbling? Or is this a case of "Uchronian fiction" or some other renaming?
If anyone likes I will put up my review of A Prophet Without Honor. I liked the book but had some comments about his historical background.