Absolutely.
Let me, I guess, try to offer a quick breakdown by region:
The British Isles
I presume it is the French who are to thank for Scotland's continuing independence, as much as any native military genius, which surely couldn't otherwise outweigh the superiority of English armies for quite so long.
The Germanies
I don't know what to do about the Germanies; is a north/south divide, as in OTL, even viable here?
We do know that the primary "players" for German allegiance are the French, the Swedes, the Austrians, the Poles, and the British. How viable is rump Prussia in this scenario?
The Italies
I'd envisioned that both the Piedmontese and Aragonese would be French allies, largely because of the military risk of doing otherwise.
Aragon and the Two Sicilies would be tied to Austria dynastically, but critical of Vienna's self-serving search for empire in northern Italy.
Iberia
Castille looks outward over the sea; the rest, toward the Mediterannean.
Perhaps the Portuguese crown decamped en masse to Brazil, turning Portugal into a reverse-dependency?
North America
The French elected not to trade Quebec for Guadaloupe.
The Confederacy won in 1862 at Antietam, then again after annexing the Mexican territories of Chihuahua and Sonora in the late 1870s. The key to victory in both cases was the recognition of Britain and France, which in the second instance provided naval assistance.
Walker established himself in Nicaragua and is effectively a Confederate client.
Africa
The high incidence of war in Europe and North America sent an enormous number of Europeans to Africa, South America, and Asia, by comparison with OTL.
Asia
I'd like a robust China capable of holding its own even against the Russians, at least for a time. Japan should be of approximately "normal" strength.