SysyphusOfEphyra
Banned
I think he means it in quality only not quantity. They might have had a lot of ships but as the R J war ahowed they weren't worth much.
With whoever sides against Japan, once Japan starts disrupting American trade with China?Facist france oh wow, still britain support to facist france it leave bad reputation for them, the importan question is who america will support facist or imperialist?
Hmmmm it up to japan though if japan just focus in russia maybe america will sell oil & weapon for them or america will sell to both side and got massive profitWith whoever sides against Japan, once Japan starts disrupting American trade with China?
Well, that is impressively wrong.Krieigsmarine
Thanks and corrected!Well, that is impressively wrong.
It looks to be an amalgamation of the common mispelling Kreigsmarine and the correct Kriegsmarine (from Krieg (war) And Marine (navy))
I was under the impression that Hitler wasn't much of an artist.
Reportedly Hitler told Neville Chamberlin "I am an artist and not a politician. Once the Polish question is settled, I want to end my life as an artist." Maybe Chamberlin should have commissioned some artwork . Believe it or not there is a market for Hitler's artwork. Wikipedia has an article that lists some of the pieces sold in recent years.I was under the impression that Hitler wasn't much of an artist.
The OTL German October Constitution in 1918 proposed a Parliamentary Monarchy system (essentially the British style) and that gained enough support to pass into law. What you have here is a Presidential system where the Chancellor can dismiss the Reichstag. Where is the Kaiser’s role? I can see Willy begrudgingly accepting the Westminster system (provided the ‘right people’ are in government) but I can’t see him going for what you’ve proposed. It’s stripping the Kaiser’s powers from him for what reason? Teenagers are getting antsy?The Reichstag gained the power to appoint and fire ministers in government. ...
As a result, the office of Chancellor became an elected office. The Chancellor would hold broad executive powers including the right to call and disband the Reichstag.
All of this was watched with a disapproving eye by the Kaiser.
More like young people (young adults) are getting tired of the status quo. Many young men fought in a war they had little say over whether they would fight in or not. They are hoping to change that.The OTL German October Constitution in 1918 proposed a Parliamentary Monarchy system (essentially the British style) and that gained enough support to pass into law. What you have here is a Presidential system where the Chancellor can dismiss the Reichstag. Where is the Kaiser’s role? I can see Willy begrudgingly accepting the Westminster system (provided the ‘right people’ are in government) but I can’t see him going for what you’ve proposed. It’s stripping the Kaiser’s powers from him for what reason? Teenagers are getting antsy?
Without commenting on the artistic merit, if someone gets there first with a theme, he can do well. Art, be it paintings, books, music, or whatever need not be "good" to become a fad.I was under the impression that Hitler wasn't much of an artist.
Yes, the staus quo you’ve laid out sounds terrible for a young, working age German:More like young people (young adults) are getting tired of the status quo.
You can’t wank Germany to the point of being a superpower and then suggest that there is great domestic discontent by the people who gain the most from it.Germany emerged the undisputed victor of World War I.
Germany now saw herself as the undisputed Great Power of Europe.
The years following the end of World War I were called the “Glad Times”
Trade had not been seriously hurt during the brief two-month war. ... By 1915 the German economy was back to its pre-war heights and showed no sign of slowing down.
Berlin would quickly reassert itself as one of the economic and cultural centers of Europe.
Other artists also found Germany a haven from persecution.
“We may well thank Almighty God for the blessings He has bestowed on us since the end of the Brief War. What could have been an unthinkable and terrible calamity for this nation has instead turned to our favour in every way we could imagine. Today Germany prospers as never before in its factories, its universities, on its farms. German art is the envy of the world. Truly this is an amazing time to be German!”(from Kaiser Wilhelm’s speech on the 10th anniversary of World War I)
More freedom of the press was allowed without censorship. And in 1924 universal suffrage was granted in the German Empire.
As Kaiser Wilhelm II had stated, “it was an amazing time to be German.”
At sea the Germans were also improving what would become known as the Kriegsmarine. .. By the 1930’s Germany boasted 5 aircraft carriers.
German development in the air was no less impressive.
In both science and in art Germany was becoming a leader in Europe.
Germany during this time did manage to rebuild relationships with Great Britain.
During the 1920’s the Germans were able to improve relations with the U.S. despite the U.S. isolationist policies. German tourism to the U.S. increased.
Germany was indeed a global superpower by the 1930’s.
And? Fought in a short, victorious War. A War with far lower casualties and far more success than anyone could have hoped for. I just don’t see there being the impetus to completely strip the Kaiser of his constitutional role. “Little say over” doesn’t ring true either. OTL the War was popular in Germany - especially at the start - and here the War is nowhere near long enough for discontent to set inMany young men fought in a war they had little say over whether they would fight in or not.
OTL after the chaos and national trauma of the loss (or impending loss) of WWI, there was just enough support for a constitutional monarchy system. Here, with a far better society and far less ‘damage’ to the national psyche, you’ve removed the Kaiser’s political roles with the justification that some guys in their forties (those that fought in the War would be older by the time of the change) are annoyed? Why would they not push for change in the immediate aftermath of the War? What of the older more senior political figures and (importantly) military personnel who have lived their entire lives under the Kaiser?They are hoping to change that.
Your thoughts are well taken Stenz. And I do appreciate your take on this.Yes, the staus quo you’ve laid out sounds terrible for a young, working age German:
You can’t wank Germany to the point of being a superpower and then suggest that there is great domestic discontent by the people who gain the most from it.
And? Fought in a short, victorious War. A War with far lower casualties and far more success than anyone could have hoped for. I just don’t see there being the impetus to completely strip the Kaiser of his constitutional role. “Little say over” doesn’t ring true either. OTL the War was popular in Germany - especially at the start - and here the War is nowhere near long enough for discontent to set in
OTL after the chaos and national trauma of the loss (or impending loss) of WWI, there was just enough support for a constitutional monarchy system. Here, with a far better society and far less ‘damage’ to the national psyche, you’ve removed the Kaiser’s political roles with the justification that some guys in their forties (those that fought in the War would be older by the time of the change) are annoyed? Why would they not push for change in the immediate aftermath of the War? What of the older more senior political figures and (importantly) military personnel who have lived their entire lives under the Kaiser?
It’s a massive change with minimal justification, IMO.
You're welcome and I apologise if I came off as pushy, but I feel the German Empire and it’s... peculiar constitutional arrangements are often misunderstood or misrepresented.Your thoughts are well taken Stenz. And I do appreciate your take on this.
Agreed, in Europe in general, but not really in Germany - the “Spirit of 1914” shows how strongly German socialists held these views, for instance - and I can’t see it growing stronger in Germany in the aftermath of a victorious War.If I can just share some final thoughts on the subject? At the time of the First World War there was a growing dissatisfaction with the status quo throughout Europe. Socialists campaigned both before and during the war prophetically warning of what would happen if war occurred. Granted in TTL because the war is shorter and less bloody that dissatisfaction is much less, but it is still there.
German socialism was mistrusted by the nobility in Germany, that much is true, but it was ‘controlled’ by the constitutional system. The very system your TL is ripping up for... angry teenagers? History should show you that “little peaceful change now may prevent a lot of violent change later” is not a realistic attitude for “old world” ruling classes to have. One could almost call it impossible for them to have. To suggest that Kaiser Wilhelm would look at the Germany you’ve crafted, with the victories and advances it‘s achieved, and think “You know what, I’m going to toss all my power away because one hundred and fifty years ago a feudal monarchy in a backwards, pathetic nation got their comeuppance” doesn't ring true to me.My rationale is that the various emperors and other powers in Europe have long memories. Communism may have been dealt a death blow with Lenin's death here. But socialism is still very much alive. The monarchies have long memories and remember all too well the fate of the nobility and monarchy of France in the French Revolution and The Terror that followed. They would like to avoid that fate if possible. A little peaceful change now may prevent a lot of violent change later.
I appreciate that you’ve made changes, I really do, but i just think you’ve got the powers the wrong way round. The Kaiser should have the power to disband the Reichstag and the Chancellor should have the limited three month power. Otherwise, essentially you have a Presidential system and the Kaiser is limited to Supreme Warlord.I don't know if this will adequately answer your critique but I will take under advisement your question regarding the Kaiser's role in German government.
Again thanks for the critique.
P.S. Please note I've made a change or two in the German entry to fit some of your critique.