Free Lancer
Banned
im Looking for Help with my TL, what are the ways that Lee can beat McClellan at Antietam
Easy. Franklin's attack goes in and is defeated, then Lee's planned counterattack shatters the Federal right. Job done.
Easy. Franklin's attack goes in and is defeated, then Lee's planned counterattack shatters the Federal right. Job done.
There's no way in hell that VI corp would have been stopped. It would have split the Confederate line right in half.
i Would Imagine That Since the ANV is Small Compared to the Army of the Potomac that Union Corp's Commanders Can Rally there Men and Counter Attack, Or Move in a Defensive Position
Well "small". There are different ways of counting, but if you take the effort to make sure you're making an apples-apples* comparison (say, bayonet strength) the two armies are relatively close in size (best estimate between 5:4 in McClellan's favour and 1:1 if Lee's special pleading is rejected).
More important is the geography. Lee's army is literally hemmed in. The stragglers can easily be found and forced back to the front. For example, in the early afternoon Hood (retired to reserve at this point) gathered up 2,000 stragglers from various commands and added them to his division for Lee's attempted turning movement against McClellan's right. In McClellan's army there is nothing physical to stop broken troops running for miles.
* The typical Lost Causer argument compares Lee's bottom end estimate of bayonet strength with McClellan's reported aggregate present for duty. There are strong indications Lee deliberately minimised his strength in his reports to justify his failure.
Easy. Franklin's attack goes in and is defeated, then Lee's planned counterattack shatters the Federal right. Job done.
what i ment was Compared to ANV To the Army of the Potomac if there is a Break through by the ANV it is only a Small Break Through not a Large one so Union Corps Commanders can Fall back and Reform there Lines
This is assuming that a) the numbers used by most historians are correct, instead of those which are used exclusively by McClellan's partisan defenders, and B) that McClellan and the Union commanders are thinking about fighting back instead of how the invincible ubermensch of the Army of Northern Virginia are going to destroy the Army of the Potomac if they don't retreat immediately.and how would this happen? what would need to be changed?
Well "small". There are different ways of counting, but if you take the effort to make sure you're making an apples-apples* comparison (say, bayonet strength) the two armies are relatively close in size (best estimate between 5:4 in McClellan's favour and 1:1 if Lee's special pleading is rejected).
Where are you getting this estimate from and what numbers are you actually concluding each side had?
I’ve never seen any claim that Lee had more than 38,000 and McClellan less than 75,000 at Antietam.
Free Lancer said:Depending on which commander that made the attack the AVN Will most likely be destroyed or captured or it will escape back into Virginia but I digress
What are the other ways the McClellan can lose the battle at Antietam?
Well, if he can fight the battle where he chooses, he'll probably attack, and we know how McClellan has responded to every previous attack by Lee - watch his men fight valiantly from a distance and then retreat. This might be different in direct defense of the Union, but it would not be unlikely.
It probably would be a victory only in name, though. Lee's army is in no shape (food and other supplies) to march on Washington or Philadelphia or something like that vs. any armed opposition, however timid McClellan is.
As opposed to wading in with sabre?
No, McClellan's command responsibilities required him to do what he did. Grant did exactly the same. If you think different you can go to your countries Staff College and tell them that the last 3 Millenia of Command and Staff theory was wrong.
Which is why they're eating green corn. Apparently army rations got boring after a while.No. They're well supplied. See Harsh's "Sounding the Shallows".
im Looking for Help with my TL, what are the ways that Lee can beat McClellan at Antietam
As opposed to being in a position to influence events. No one is suggesting McClellan lead from the front, simply that he play a more active role - his role is like that of Lee at Gettysburg, to use an example of "detached to the point of harming his army" generalship.
Which is why they're eating green corn. Apparently army rations got boring after a while.