3B045811-F287-4C30-94F7-96ADBE887D78.jpeg

“Tory Tony Blair”
Osborne was quick to launch his confrontational approach in prime ministers questions. He labelled Brown as a “chancellor who has overstayed his welcome” and accused him of returning to the old “tax and spend” of the Labour Party. Brown fervently defended his economic record as both Chancellor and Prime Minister pointing to strong economic performance since 1997. Osborne was compared by some Tories, perhaps more than a little eager to return to power, to Tony Blair however this was slightly laughed at. However like Blair, Osborne carried far more charisma than his dull predecessor Howard and quickly honed his skills at the dispatch box.

“I found it far more painful to deal with that pompous sod than his grandparent of a Tory Howard.” - Brown in his autobiography: 2016

Although perhaps more liberal than his predecessors Osborne continued the defiantly Eurosceptic outlook and stated that “A referendum on our membership of the European Union will remain flagship policy of our party. The British people must be allowed to decide their position in the EU. Whether we are stronger in or out.”. Howard returned to the backbenches but stated his continuing support for the front bench. Cameron as Shadow Chancellor came as a surprise to many as many felt he would be comfortable staying as Shadow Home Secretary.

The Democratic Party put increasing pressure on Brown to reform the electoral system to be more proportional however the prime minster wouldn’t buckle. To support PR would be to destroy almost any chance of a Labour Majority in the next election and Brown was not keen on negotiations with any party. The only truly appealing coalition partners were the Green Party and the Scottish Socialists, both of whom without any parliamentary representation. Brown did react positively to the election of Howard Dean and looked forward to working with him staring January 2005.

“To say the least I was bloody glad I didn’t have to work with Bush for another 4 years.” - Brown in his autobiography: 2016
 
d98benn.jpg

Respect_logo.jpg

The Birth of Respect
The Labour Party has moved slightly to the left under Brown. Although still decisively more centrist than any previous Labour government, attempts had been successfully made to rekindle the divide between “New Labour” and “Old Labour” that had formed under Blair and with the renationalisation of the railways well underway the left of the party felt more impowered than ever. However, the left wanted to make sure their voice would never be unheard again. This led to several left wing mps: George Galloway, Tony Benn, Jeremy Corbyn, Dennis Skinner and John McDonnell forming the Respect Group. Respect was to be a group within the Labour Party advocating for Socialist policies to be adopted by the Labour Party.

Galloway had proposed the name Respect to reflect upon the socialist beliefs in equality and tackling poverty for all. The group was naturally anti war reflecting many of the founding members roles in the stop the war coalition and echoed the quote from Benn “If we can find the money to kill people, we can find the money to help people.”. Respect did not advocate for any sort of split from Labour however claiming that “this sort of unsuccessful pointless route was already undertaken by the SDP in the eighties.” and that true reform would be achieved through activism and advocation rather than the splitting of the SDP or the “infiltration” of Militant. Brown seemed to be quite sympathetic to Respect and welcomed the addition of the group to the party. Even the most ardent Blairites seemed to tolerate the group as long as it didn’t “stir the hive”.

Officially launched on October 22nd 2004 Respect was primarily open to Labour MPs sympathetic to its beliefs however it offered membership to the public as a “registered supporter” free of charge. The group had quickly gathered around 10,000 “registered supporters” by the start of 2005 and had also secured a few donations from the public in order to support campaigning and advocacy purposes. Respect would make sure that the voice of the left of Labour would never be unheard again.
 
image.jpg

The Aviation Scandal
As 2004 came to a close Brown faced his first true crisis. Recent reports had suggested that Heathrow Airport, with its two runways, was on the long road of stagnation and that total passenger numbers were beginning to dip. Heathrow was therefore at risk of losing its status as a hub airport for Europe. As such, a proposal to expand Heathrow and add a third runway would be put to a vote in the Commons. The three main parties all allowed a free vote on the matter as between them their were supporters and opposers to the third runway. Brown, Osborne and Davey all advocated for expansion. Expansion was also supported by airline companies such as British Airways, trade unions noting how many jobs it could bring to south west London as well as support from airports up and down the country.

The expansion had many critics. From local residents worried by even more noise pollution to their area as well as high up environmentalist politicians. Zac Goldsmith, Democratic Member of Parliament for Croydon South,
would work with Labour mp Chris Huhne and the Green Party to organise a march of roughly 500 people through outer London from Twickenham to Heathrow in protest of the expansion. Ken Livingstone, who had recently been re-elected Mayor for a second term against Democratic candidate Simon Hughes, would also come out against such a move. However it would ultimately be Parliament that would decide such a move and the commons would vote 489-140 to support the expansion of Heathrow.

Although around 700 homes would be destroyed in the process the government would ensure that everything would be compensated for and despite many protests the airport expansion plans would begin with construction starting in 2006 and and expected finishing date of August 2010 for the new runway and sixth terminal. Richard Branson congratulated the “efficiency of the government and Heathrow airport in guaranteeing the future prosperity of British Airlines”. Environmental concerns would continue to fester but 2005 would finally dawn as Brown entered his third year in government.
 
24-george-galloway-get.jpg

2005: The Left Ascendant
Learning from the now President Dean, Respect used the Media to its advantage to spread it’s message of socialist “Old Labour” policies. A website was set up and advertisements were put in friendly newspapers to the cause of Respect. The movement also gained a noteworthy endorsement from Rhodri Morgan, the current First Minister of Wales. Morgan had always distanced himself from the government with his “clear red water” policies separating Wales and Westminster but this was a full endorsement of the proposed policies of Respect. In turn this helped the movement break into Wales as until the regisered supporters had been mostly English and Scottish confined.
latest
Across the pond the Democrats returned to the White House after 4 years in an election widely compared to Jimmy Carter’s failed re-election bid in 1976. President Howard Dean and Vice President John Edwards had successfully capitalised on the Iraq War and had promised that “the troops will be home” in the next 2 years. Also in Deans quite radical administration targets was an introduction of universal healthcare. Dean met with Brown in March of 2005 and the two found that, despite Dean’s energetic nature compared to Brown’s relaxed outlook, they surprisingly got on very well. Brown respected Dean’s attempts to provide healthcare to Americans, especially considering he had cited the NHS as an example to follow in his campaign.

This meeting brought about a rekindled special relationship between the two nations that had stagnated for the past 2 years. Even Blair, still Member of Parliament for Sedgefield, admitted that he was impressed by Howard Dean and his professional approach to healthcare. However, Dean faced a challenge to introducing the “Health Act” as the Democrats only held 51 seats in the Senate and would need all but 1 Democratic Senator to support the act and for Vice President Edwards to break the tie. Intense lobbying would be needed to garner support from all the Democrats, including the numerous conservative Southern “Blue Dog” Democrats. Although Dean had achieved a minor success with the repeal of “Don’t Ask don’t Tell” allowing openly gay people to serve in the military. It would take far more to achieve the two figure points of his administration.
 
images

Another Good Year
Brown had reason to remain jubilant in 2005 ( though that wasn’t exactly his style) from continued strong economic performance. In march the office for national statistics reported that employment was at a record high of 30 million. Manufacturing jobs had mostly held up despite reports of a decline in figures. Brown claimed that this should be attributed to Labours “fiscal responsible balance” policy. March also brought about the return of Doctor Who to TV for the first series since 1989, with Paul McGann returning to the role to take part in his own series as the Eighth Incarnation of the Doctor. The Wedding of Charles and Camilla did bring about some furrowed brows at the monarchy, never the popular couple amongst the British public. In coordination with Gordon Brown the Labour-Scottish Socialist Coalition in the Scottish Parliament gave enhanced rights to the Gaelic Language, surely appealing to the devoted community on the Western Isles.

Respect was on the rise still. Candidates, if they so wished, could now campaign under the banner of “Labour-Respect” in future general elections, local elections and by-elections in a similar manner to those working with the cooperative party. The left of the party hailed it as a victory for representation of all sections of the party. Rhodri Morgan had already become Labour-Respect First Minister of Wales and their were rumours of the Scottish Socialists merging with Labour-Respect as cordial relations has already been established prior. Galloway had become leader of Scottish Labour-Respect, McDonnell of the English branch and Martin Caton from the Welsh branch. Attempts at a Northern Irish Branch were unsuccessful due to the SDLP’s protests however the SDLP remained sympathetic to the cause of Respect.
images
President Dean, in the latter half of his first hundred days, had rammed his Health Act through the senate. After successfully lobbying 50 of the Democrats to his cause as well as one progressive Republican from Colorado, he was able to bring Universal Single Payer Healthcare to America. Although the introduction of it would be slow he had implemented one of his vote winning campaign promises. The Health Act was at risk of being lost as early as the 2006 midterms but Dean hoped Americans would warm up to it as he declared “the days of health insurance were over and now every American was entitled to healthcare just like every nation in Britain.”. Progressives hailed Deans victory but only time would tell if he would be successful.
 
George-Osborne-speaking-at-the-conference-815768.jpg

Three Way Split
George Osborne had always struggled with image. He had a posh background that didn’t resonate with the millions of voters he had to win over. This wasn’t helped by the recently revived Spitting Image, with the popular satirical puppet show portraying him as a young Etonian student. Even though Labour had been in government for 8 years the Tories still hadn’t obtained a consistent poll lead since the lead up to the Iraq war vote in 2003. Some in the Conservative party were beginning to wonder if Osbornes Leadership victory over a year ago had just been a lucky fluke. Most polls showed Labour at 33%, the Democratic Party at 32% and the Tories at 31%. Osborne had been warmly received in 2004 as he provided some contrast to the dull Howard leadership. This argument was eroding fast in further polling.

Polling amongst 2000 members of the British public

How do you view Gordon Brown in his role as Prime Minister?

Favourable: 57%
Unfavourable: 35%
Don’t know: 8%

How do you view George Osborne in his role as Leader of the opposition?

Favourable: 27%
Unfavourable: 60%
Don’t know: 13%

How do you view Ed Davey in his role as Leader of the Democratic Party?

Favourable: 44%
Unfavourable: 29%
Don’t know: 27%

hqdefault.jpg
These polls further demonstrated Osbornes image problem. The comments of “Tory Tony Blair” from 2004 looked dated now. This wasn’t helped in the aftermath of the crash of British Airways Flight 55 from Heathrow to Johannesburg where, upon takeoff, a bird strike caused failure of the engines leading to the loss of 134 lives on July 14th 2005. While both Brown and Davey visited families effected and offered their condolences, Osborne seemingly to the press ignored the human loss and focused on attacking the governments air policy. The move was viewed as uncaring and though Osborne apologised for his remarks in the aftermath of the crash the damage had already been done. Spitting Image subsequently turned the “uncaring Osborne” dial to 11 in a “crisis, what crisis?” manner. In the aftermath of this PR disaster it was easy to speculate. Would Osborne receive a visit from the men in grey suits?
 
_100246604_gettyimages-468265584.jpg

Still Divided
Osborne had been given 6 months. After the disaster of mid 2005 he had until 2006 to recover his image. Although he could say things hadn’t gotten worse for the Tories things hadn’t gotten any better. In December polls showed Labour at 36%, the Tories at just 27% and the Democrats at 34%. If repeated at a General Election it was feared not only would the Tories step back in seats but that the Democratic Party could knock them out of their status as the official opposition. The Shiny face of the Osborne of 2004 had been replaced by the Osborne of 2006, unpopular with his party as well as the public. Phillip Hammond continued his smug “I told you so” all throughout the year.

It was thus no surprise that just 2 years after becoming leader that enough support amongst mps allowed a no confidence vote in Osborne to be held. The 154 Conservative MPs would vote if they should continue with Osborne or hold another leadership election in which Osborne would be unable to stand. Although he had the support of the Shadow Chancellor David Cameron, most of the cabinet didn’t want to support the sinking ship.

No Confidence Vote in George Osborne

Support Osborne: 35 22.73%
Oppose Osborne: 119 77.27%

Much like Blair himself, “Tory Tony” had fallen. The ensuing leadership election, with many MPs seeing the next election as an inevitable second victory for Brown, would see at first only two men put their name forward. Surprisingly, Iain Duncan-Smith would declare himself a candidate and instead endorsed Greg Hands as the Thatcherite candidate. Phillip Hammond stood up as the 2nd place candidate from 2003, believing the members would prefer a moderate to a hard right Thatcherite like Hands. However, unexpectedly William Hague announced that he was standing for a 2nd shot at the leadership.

“I was the leader of the Conservative Party from 1997 to 2001. Although I’ll be the first to admit we didn’t exactly get to power in that time, I believe I helped to save the party from destruction. After the uncertainty of this no confidence vote, my previous experience shows I can offer crisis leadership better than my two opponents.”
- William Hague announcing his candidacy in the 2006 Conservative Party Leadership Election.

William Hague emphasising the crisis amongst the Conservative party was considered an act of political genius. He remained immensely popular amongst the largely Eurosceptic Tory membership as the man who stood defiantly against The Pact in its heyday. By positioning himself as the light through the dark he could trump Hammond, with his credentials as a moderate being outshined by his boring label. Hands too suffered but from lack of name recognition. Other than an endorsement by Duncan-Smith he was considered an unknown figure. Hague therefore knew all he had to do was extinguish any chance of Hands gaining recognition and then he can cruise to victory against Hammond in the membership vote. Therefore he focused all his attacks on Hammond, effectively ignoring Hands and not giving him the media coverage he needed.

2006 Conservative Party Leadership Election - MPs Vote

Greg Hands: 27 17.5%
Phillip Hammond: 54 35.1%
William Hague: 73 47.4%

Hague’s strategy reaped it’s reward for him. Hands was never able to pick up much steam as the media treated it as a two horse race of Hammond vs Hague and ,in a more decisive victory than Osborne’s, this lead to his success in the membership vote.

2006 Conservative Party Leadership Election - Membership Vote

Phillip Hammond: 32.1% 60,829
William Hague: 67.9% 128,670

Despite his devastating loss in 2001, Hague found himself in the same role he was in 5 years ago. The popular Yorkshireman was back for a second shot, would he disappoint his party or would they be glad to have let him try again?
 
william-hague.jpg

“Now let’s focus on the election.”
William Hague, using some of the experience he had so touted about, was quick to grab the bull of the Conservative Leadership by its horns. After all, with an election coming up in 2007 or 2008, a strong Conservative party had a chance to finally dethrone the Labour Party after a decade of power. Hague unveiled his new shadow cabinet the day after he was made leader. Hague attempted to balance the cabinet between high profile supporters of each candidate, recognising the mistake he made in his millennium Shadow Cabinet.

Conservative Shadow Cabinet of William Hague

Leader of the Opposition - William Hague
Shadow Chancellor - David Davis (Supported Hague)
Shadow Foreign Secretary - Boris Johnson (Supported Hague)
Shadow Home Secretary - Nigel Farage (Supported Hands)
Conservative Party Chairman - Michael Portillo (Supported Hammond)
Shadow Education and Employment Secretary - David Cameron (Supported Hammond)
Shadow Defence Secretary - Iain Duncan-Smith (Supported Hands)
Shadow Health Secretary - Liam Fox (Supported Hague)
Shadow Business Secretary - Phillip Hammond
Shadow Trade and Industry Secretary - John Redwood (Supported Hands)
Shadow Food, Fisheries and Agriculture Secretary - Francis Maude (Supported Hague)
Shadow Environment Secretary - Justine Greening (Supported Hammond)
Shadow Transport Secretary - Eric Pickles (Supported Hague)
Shadow Scottish Secretary - David Mundell (Supported Hague)
Shadow Welsh Secretary - David Davies (Supported Hammond)
Shadow Northern Irish Secretary - Mark Simmonds (Supported Hands)

Osborne himself had been offered Trade and Industry Secretary but had ardently declined it and had joined his friend Michael Howard in the backbenches, though it was rumoured that Howard could return to the cabinet should any minister resign. Hague also claimed that his leadership would bring a return to the conservatism espoused by his modernisation plans of the late nineties. This seemed to play well with the electorate with the Conservatives surging back up to 34% in opinion polls, leading over Labour’s 33% and the 30% for the Democratic Party.

Hague’s skills at debating allowed him to frequently trounce Gordon Brown at prime ministers questions. Finally the Tories had an effective leader of the opposition. With Hague’s leadership now secure the next election would be between Gordon Brown, William Hague and whoever became leader of the Democratic Party. The Democrats had stated that the 3 year transition period was over and that a leadership election would be held at their annual conference in September. Ed Davey, after 7 years of leadership, announced he would not be standing but instead wanted to serve in a possible Democratic Party cabinet. Clarke too stated his preference for an economic role therefore meaning the next leader of the Democratic party was for now at least, not at all certain.
 
If anyone would like to suggest a candidate for the next Democratic Party leader I’d love to hear it. Generally I’m looking for an orange book liberal that isn’t Clegg because obviously I want to differ from OTL. I am tempted to make an OTL member of the continuation Liberals (Who merged back into the Lib Dems in 2002) leader to really provide some contrast. Thanks to everyone who continues to read this timeline and I hope I am providing an interesting narrative.
 
If anyone would like to suggest a candidate for the next Democratic Party leader I’d love to hear it. Generally I’m looking for an orange book liberal that isn’t Clegg because obviously I want to differ from OTL. I am tempted to make an OTL member of the continuation Liberals (Who merged back into the Lib Dems in 2002) leader to really provide some contrast. Thanks to everyone who continues to read this timeline and I hope I am providing an interesting narrative.
This is an interesting alternative history, Gordon Brown getting his chance to shine is nice to see and it's interesting to see a British Political Timeline where a three party system is formed.

I have no ideas for Democratic Leader Candidates, maybe a OTL female Liberal MP. Anyway carry on the good work.
 
If anyone would like to suggest a candidate for the next Democratic Party leader I’d love to hear it. Generally I’m looking for an orange book liberal that isn’t Clegg because obviously I want to differ from OTL. I am tempted to make an OTL member of the continuation Liberals (Who merged back into the Lib Dems in 2002) leader to really provide some contrast. Thanks to everyone who continues to read this timeline and I hope I am providing an interesting narrative.

The standard choice would be David Laws, but a more interesting choice would be Susan Kramer, MP for Richmond Park until 2010. She wrote a chapter in the Orange Book, was a Transport Minister from the Lords during the coalition, and then was the Treasury Spokesperson under Tim Farron. She's broadly on the centre of the Lib Dems, but would work well as a compromise pick between libertarian Pact types and the parties' social liberals.
 
The standard choice would be David Laws, but a more interesting choice would be Susan Kramer, MP for Richmond Park until 2010. She wrote a chapter in the Orange Book, was a Transport Minister from the Lords during the coalition, and then was the Treasury Spokesperson under Tim Farron. She's broadly on the centre of the Lib Dems, but would work well as a compromise pick between libertarian Pact types and the parties' social liberals.
Interesting suggestion, I hadn’t considered Kramer. Incidentally we share a birthday. The only issue for her would be age. Hard for her to win over the university students angry about tuition fees and I don’t see her pulling a Corbyn where the youth like her because she’s old. She’d make a good deputy leader though so thank you for suggesting it.
 
Liberal-Democrat-logo.jpg

“A Party of Radical Ideas”
Summer of 2006 had been slow for the United Kingdom. The economy was still doing well although growth was starting to stagnate. Attention, for once, was focused on Britain’s third party. The lack of a front runner for the Democratic Leadership has provided a excitingly wide selection of candidates. Ming Campbell too, after 7 years at the wheel with Davey, had vacated his position as deputy leadership once again allowing for the chance to select the leader amongst the membership and the deputy amongst the MPs.
vince-cable.jpg

Vince Cable, representing the diminished Social Democratic wing of the party, was the first to announce his candidacy. A lot of the membership had gradually drifted to Labour over the years however some continued to cling on to the hope of achieving progressive centrist politics.
220px-David_Laws_MP_2008.jpg

Claiming to represent Davey’s policies, David Laws of Yeovil would stand and quickly become the favourite to win. Laws had prior experience working closely with the party. He had published the Lib Dem manifesto of the 2003 election, known colloquially as “The Orange Book”. Davey however did not endorse a candidate and this hurt Laws as now he wasn’t seen as the “heir”.
_47649976_-16.jpg

Robert Wheway, known as Rob, entered as the dark horse candidate. He had originally been part of the continuation liberal party but has rejoined in 2000 followed by the rest of his party in 2002. He had quickly climbed up the ranks in the Lib Dems and was able to capture a Birmingham seat from Labour in a shock defeat for them in 2003. He claimed to represent a revival of Gladstonian liberalism but brought into the 21st century. He was able to win over many of the party membership through an effective grassroots campaign and unlike Pickles, he could win without needing to go through with an mp vote. He advocated for “radical” policies such as free public transport, the establishment of a European pollution police force, scrapping trident and the British nuclear arsenal and all the while maintaining the confidence in free markets established under Davey.
key_Dan_Rogerson-472x265.jpg

A fourth candidate emerged in Dan Rogerson, mp for North Cornwall, who proposed an extreme pro-European position within the party. Stating that his government would advocate for immediate entry into the euro as well as campaign to federalise the European Union and become a true nation state. Being Cornish, he also advocated for a Cornish Assembly with devolved powers similar to Wales and Scotland. Rogerson wouldn’t pick up much steam as a candidate, but his entry would broaden the debate on Europe within the leadership election. An expanded electorate of 110,413 party members would now pick their leader through the STV voting system.

Democratic Party Leadership Election First Preference Votes

Vince Cable: 23,408 21.2%
David Laws: 43,834 39.7%
Robert Wheway: 33,565 30.4%
Dan Rogerson: 9,606 8.7%

Laws, Cable and Wheway has all advanced to the second round however Cable stepped down as he knew that even if he secured l of Rogersons votes he would be unable to overtake Wheway in the second round. Highlighting his advocation for further devolution and regional assemblies for the English regions, Rogerson gave his blessing to Wheway. Cable too gave a cautious endorsement of Wheway and this pushed the relatively unknown mp over the top.

Democratic Party Leadership Election Final Preference Votes

David Laws: 48,582 44.0%
Robert Wheway: 61,831 56.0%

“I’d first like to say Thank You to everyone that voted for me. I’m truly humbled that I am now the leader of the Democratic Party and I will ensure I will serve you all well, whether you voted for me or not. The Democratic Party is a party of radical ideas, the NHS was one of our ideas. We are not a party of the so-called “Dead Centre” and I know you all know that. The Democratic Party is the strongest third party since Lloyd George. Under my leadership we will strive to be in government. Under my leadership we will fight for the people through our policies on a British Bill of Rights and make sure no voice is left unheard again with the introduction of a more proportional voting system! Conference, from here on out, the good fight for power has begun!”
- Acceptance speech of Rob Wheway

The deputy leadership saw a struggle between Susan Kramer and Zac Goldsmith. Goldsmith had received much kudos from environmentalists for his brave campaigning against a third runway at Heathrow but as a former Tory could upset the social Democratic apple cart even more. Kramer was viewed as the safe moderate who could appeal to everyone. It was therefore Kramer who won the deputy leadership in a landslide amongst MPs.

Democratic Party Deputy Leadership Election

Susan Kramer: 71 85.5%
Zac Goldsmith: 12 14.5%
P1000653.JPG

A transfer of leadership and deputy leadership amongst the Democratic Party set the scene for the next election. Both Hague and Wheway had been unexpected and number crunchers were left staring blankly at their screens trying to work out who would vote for who. Who would be holding the keys to Number 10 as the second decade of the 21st century started to emerge from over the horizon?
 
lord-paddy-ashdown-is-interviewed-by-andrew-marr-during-an-interview-picture-id490707171

Burning our bridges
Paddy Ashdown: “No, nobody expected Rob to win in 2006. But I suppose it’s become something of a tradition that the outsider wins the leadership contest. I personally thought Vince would clinch a victory against Laws. I was actually quite pleased that Rob beat David. Something told me that I didn’t think he would be able to replicate Ed’s performances. Wheway had that aura of mystery about him, nobody really knew he was until the election and I think that’s what got people talking...”

Interviewer: “And how did you react to the news from Vince?”

Paddy Ashdown: “I was devastated. One of my closest friends leaving the party wasn’t an easy pill to swallow. Looking back, I should have seen it coming. He always confided in me that he ‘wasn’t sure what party he belonged to anymore’. I almost laughed it off at the time. I should have seen it coming really.”

-Interview with Paddy Ashdown in 2014

3rd October 2006: Vince Cable’s Twickenham Home:

The election of another libertarian to the top spot was seen as the end point of a long decline of social liberals and social democrats in the Democratic Party. Vince Cable, never totally on board with Daveys thinking, was unsure of how the party had lost Kennedy and Huhne and yet continued to poll well. Finally in the weeks after Wheway had been elected leader he decided he wished to leave the Democrats. He was 63 now and whilst Kennedy and Huhne were relatively young he did not have the time or really the desire to fight for another party at the moment. Putting the pen down that had drafted his resignation letter from the party he had been a member of for 18 years he looked defeated. Politics had changed since the founding of the then Social and Liberal Democrats in 1988. He decided at the very least to serve out the remainder of his term as Twickenham MP. After all, he owed the people that had elected him all these years something. God knows it would have to be under a different party though. Maybe just maybe, with a glint of hope in his eyes, it could amount to something. Excitably reaching for his phone before calming himself, he dialled the number of someone he had not spoken with in ages.

“Hello? Who is this? Your number didn’t come up as registered.”

“Listen John, it’s Vince, about that conversation we had a few years ago in Brighton...”
 
Ooh interesting, I wonder if we'll have Gordon Brown repeating Ramsey MacDonald next election. Getting a labour minority, trying to make it work for about a year before calling another election only for the another party to collapse (maybe the conservatives) leading to another party gaining control.
 
Ooh interesting, I wonder if we'll have Gordon Brown repeating Ramsey MacDonald next election. Getting a labour minority, trying to make it work for about a year before calling another election only for the another party to collapse (maybe the conservatives) leading to another party gaining control.
The Conservatives are actually in a relatively stable position compared to previous years. Both them and the Democrats are benefitting from natural fatigue of nearly ten years of Labour. You are partially right about the next election though :)
 
Conservative+Party+Annual+Conference+XyIdSrhoUw8l.jpg

A Bridge to Ulster
William Hague, in preparation for his second election shot, realised that every seat mattered. The election of Malcolm Rifkind to the position of Speaker meant another Tory Seat was gone. Realising this, he got into talks with Reg Empey of the Ulster Umionist Party about a possible electoral agreement. Obviously the party shared many views and had often worked together in the past. Under this agreement, the Ulster Unionist mps would sit with the Conservatives in the Commons but would exist independently in a manner similar to the Labour Co-op and Labour-Respect mps. William Hague announced this agreement in November.

“Ulster is an integral part of the United Kingdom and yet for too long they have been cut off from the inner workings of Westminster. Under this historic alliance, Northern Irish mps of all crafts and skills would be able to serve under a Conservative Government. This is a historic day in true representation of the people of Ulster. We have in the Conservative Party today built a bridge of friendship and cooperation to Ulster.”
- William Hague announcing the formation of the Ulster Conservative Unionist National Front, or UCU-NF.

Broadly, the Unionist Protestants welcomed this alliance. Pollsters predict we that the electoral agreement would win big in the next general election. The DUP, until recently, had been challenging the UUP as the Unionist voice of Northern Ireland and yet now Paisleys party had been quashed by a deal with the Tories.
640px-SDP_Logo.png

Meanwhile the Democratic Party had been left stunned by Vince Cable’s defection. He had not defected to Labour, but to the continuing Social Democratic Party. Years ago after the 2003 Pact Conference when the merger was officially announced and put into place, Vince Cable, with a head full of anxiety about the merger, had wandered into a cafe on the beach for some refreshment and by chance had an encounter with John Bates. Bates was the leader of the continuation of the Social Democratic Party. The two broadly had shared the same views and this led Bates to offer Cable to join his party. At the time Cable had considered the offer only briefly before refusing. He took the offer 3 years late but all the same the SDP now had their first MP since 1992.

The outbreak of this news caused almost frenzied excitement amongst the party as now the next election could be a time to shine for the SDP. David Owen, who had been an independent for many years, decided to return to the party following this news. While it didn’t cause the 50% opinion poll the alliance had in its early days it did perk some interest in the SDP. Perhaps this old dog still had some fight in it?
 
Interesting suggestion, I hadn’t considered Kramer. Incidentally we share a birthday. The only issue for her would be age. Hard for her to win over the university students angry about tuition fees and I don’t see her pulling a Corbyn where the youth like her because she’s old. She’d make a good deputy leader though so thank you for suggesting it.

Will happily take that! :D
 
Top