Thanks!!!!
Actually, I'd expect the Italians to take a more independent approach. Ansaldo-Fiat had notoriously high influence on the fascist regime and rejected even local production of German tanks when it was offered, instead suggesting indigenous designs.OK here's my first take on this idea, I say first because I want to do another one but here's what we got now.
View attachment 704245
I started with an E-50 hull because that may be the direction the Germans would have taken post war had they won. The premise I'm using here is that the Italians are following the Germans lead but doing things a bit simpler, I changed the suspension because I cant see the Italians going with an interleaved wheel suspension but they would have to upgrade to a torsion bar suspension for sure.
The suspension here is from a Marder IFV. The turret is also from the E-50 but I gave it the Leo-1's gun mantlet, sights and smoke grenade launcher, the 105mm gun came from one of Claymore's old pics,
So a lot of German bits but I feel it has a simpler Italian look to it, a sort of good enough attitude about it.
Open to suggestions and critiques for the second version I plan to make.
I agree but always felt Ansaldo-Fiat was made up of major A-holes so went in another direction.Actually, I'd expect the Italians to take a more independent approach. Ansaldo-Fiat had notoriously high influence on the fascist regime and rejected even local production of German tanks when it was offered, instead suggesting indigenous designs.
We're more likely to see a modern take on the P43 program instead.
They're true, Ansaldo-Fiat had a monopoly on Italian AFV designs and refused to incorporate any ideas from outside sources.Is the shitty impression of the Italian tanks are true or is it overhyped? What can be done to avoid it or help Italian armor?
rather than being the only major power to keep Ford and his modern Factories out of the country, the Moose embraces FordismThey're true, Ansaldo-Fiat had a monopoly on Italian AFV designs and refused to incorporate any ideas from outside sources.
The only way things could have been improved IMO would be if Mussolini sicked the Mafia on em (Ansaldo-Fiat). I even used that premise in a background story for an alt-Italian tank once.
Can't blame you for that yeah. OTO actually nearly got a contract in 1941 to build Pz IIIs and a new factory so that could be the starting point for German-style Italian vehicles in the long run.I agree but always felt Ansaldo-Fiat was made up of major A-holes so went in another direction.
Is the shitty impression of the Italian tanks are true or is it overhyped? What can be done to avoid it or help Italian armor?
As pointed out by Cortz, the biggest problem is that almost all Italian military companies were nationalized and owned by fascist higher-ups competing between each other and working for profit. Ansaldo eventually got a monopoly on tanks and Fiat on tank engines to the detriment of OTO and state design bureaus, which meant that they had no reason to compete on the quality front and could go cheap on everything. This is why Ansaldo stopped welding tanks after the first batch of CV33s.They're true, Ansaldo-Fiat had a monopoly on Italian AFV designs and refused to incorporate any ideas from outside sources.
The only way things could have been improved IMO would be if Mussolini sicked the Mafia on em (Ansaldo-Fiat). I even used that premise in a background story for an alt-Italian tank once.
Though had they put their minds to it, could have made an early M-24/AMX-13 type light tank early in the WarHe said in 1937 that a heavy breakthrough tank should weigh about 15 tons.
I forgot, for some reason Rosini didn't want to use aircraft engines either. We truly needed OTO to remain a competitor.Though had they put their minds to it, could have made an early M-24/AMX-13 type light tank early in the War
They had lightweight Aero engines, Torsion bar, and use the light 75mm/L27 and 13.2mm HMG in a turret
Alas they are true, this is an example of the most common Italian 'AFVs' in 1941:Is the shitty impression of the Italian tanks are true or is it overhyped? What can be done to avoid it or help Italian armor?
Isn't that the model that Ethiopians managed to put out of commission by hopping on, knocking on the hatch, and beheading the crew when they opened it?Alas they are true, this is an example of the most common Italian 'AFVs' in 1941:
View attachment 705900
By Stefan Didam - Schmallenberg - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=27522547
the need for locking hatches wasn't seen as needed, until you actually had close assaults to AFVsIsn't that the model that Ethiopians managed to put out of commission by hopping on, knocking on the hatch, and beheading the crew when they opened it?
That's actually even worse than I thought.the need for locking hatches wasn't seen as needed, until you actually had close assaults to AFVs
US had to retrofit locks for the fuel ports on the tanks to keep the Japanese from sticking flammable bits down the pipesThat's actually even worse than I thought.
Someone must've been a good boy this year, surprised it was you.Well the fat dude in the red suit has been remarkably generous this year and with 3 x kits and a new tool set I will be ready for some New Year whiffing.
Kits? An FT-17 for the Norwegian Truge conversion, a Valentine and a M8 GMC - @cortz#9 guess where this is going! 👍😉
Though were made to fight hereAlas they are true, this is an example of the most common Italian 'AFVs' in 1941: