My only comment would be about the HMS Lion.
Battlecruisers were out of fashion by then, and I also seriously doubt the WWI vintage ship would still be in service in 1948. This ship is therefore a replacement ship named Lion.
As others have alluded to, and I will explain in a later post, this is not HMS Lion from WW1. This is a new ship more along the lines of a fully armored battlecruiser.
I'm surprised nobody talked about how asb my ambush off Samar, especially when compared to the otl battle of Samar.
I wanted to make a post talking about the Izumo's design which is taken from world of warships but itself is taken from a preliminary design for the Yamato. Originally I was going to use Hiraga's design X that I mentioned in my post but didn't for a number of reasons. These reasons were mainly its slow speed of 26 knots and also using two types of turrets which makes manufacturing complicated. I personally did not like Fujimoto's proposed 35,000-ton battleship because the secondaries were outside the main armored belt and I felt that it would risk an explosion of the secondary battery.
Another thing I noticed when reading about the preliminary designs for the Yamato class was how many of the preliminary designs had an all-forward armament so I decided to go forward with using a different design for what I imagine a treaty battleship built by the IJN would look like. Of course, I should mention that I have a bias in favor of all designs with all forward armaments and high speeds.
The thing that I would like to discuss is displacement. The preliminary design for the Izumo is A140-J2 which would have displaced about 54,000 tons. Why the Japanese cheated they cheated within reason. The thing I am confused about is how Hiraga and Fujimoto designed a 35,000-ton battleship with about the same armament and armor. Did the extra 3 knots really add about 19,000 tons in displacement or am I missing something for why A140-J2 displaced so much more than the proposed treaty battleships?