More use of, and an explicit recognition of, a General Assembly override of a Security Council veto, i.e something like Resolution 377 in the UN Charter. Or allowing a SC super-majority (four fifths) override a veto.Keeping same structure but limiting the amount times a Veto can be used by permenant members within a given term.
Well I know I cant use the veto this time, but if you do that I will start a nuclear war just saying....Keeping same structure but limiting the amount times a Veto can be used by permenant members within a given term.
Keeping same structure but limiting the amount times a Veto can be used by permenant members within a given term.
I have to admit allowing just one country to veto a resolution was the biggest mistake in creating the UN.More use of, and an explicit recognition of, a General Assembly override of a Security Council veto, i.e something like Resolution 377 in the UN Charter. Or allowing a SC super-majority (four fifths) override a veto.
But the UNSC isn't really about doing the right nice good things, its about stopping WWIII. The veto protects the interests of the great powers and therefore prevents them having to resort to force or even overtly threatening to use it. It therefore adds a layer of peaceful legitimacy to maintaining the status quo and preventing large wars like the one that destroyed the LON.I have to admit allowing just one country to veto a resolution was the biggest mistake in creating the UN.
But the UNSC isn't really about doing the right nice good things, its about stopping WWIII. The veto protects the interests of the great powers and therefore prevents them having to resort to force or even overtly threatening to use it. It therefore adds a layer of peaceful legitimacy to maintaining the status quo and preventing large wars like the one that destroyed the LON.
Somehow I don't see the US or USSR agreeing to that. Or Britain or France.Keeping same structure but limiting the amount times a Veto can be used by permenant members within a given term.
More use of, and an explicit recognition of, a General Assembly override of a Security Council veto, i.e something like Resolution 377 in the UN Charter. Or allowing a SC super-majority (four fifths) override a veto.
No it doesn't it just exposes the 6th fleet to a bit more light....A supermajority that blocks veto would change the dynamics of the Middle East dramatically