AHC: The Fourth Reich

Not counting the EU, your challenge is to make a modern autocratic/nationalistic/reactionary Germany come into existence with no PODs before May 1, 1945. Stuff like Adolf Hitler fleeing to Argentina and returning with an army are off the table.
 
Bit hard to do with that late POD, specialtiy make Germany much more uathocratic and nationalist. Allies are going to win and telling what kind of state new Germany is.
 
It's vaguely thinkable that, in a scenario with an ongoing Cold War, the East German ruling elite takes on a more overt nationalist tone, à la Ceaucescu or even go full Juche style. That way, you'd have an autocratic and nationalistic Germany, albeit not a united one. Although the specific geopolitical position of the DDR probably would never allow it to take its nationalism as far as leaving the Warsaw Pact or follow an really autonomous diplomacy.
 

Garrison

Donor
Not counting the EU, your challenge is to make a modern autocratic/nationalistic/reactionary Germany come into existence with no PODs before May 1, 1945. Stuff like Adolf Hitler fleeing to Argentina and returning with an army are off the table.
Even a hint of such a regime is going to bring the hammer down, no one is going to risk Germany deciding to go for round three.
 
Even a hint of such a regime is going to bring the hammer down, no one is going to risk Germany deciding to go for round three.
Apparently, Krushchev was willing to risk it--during his effort to bring Mongolia into the Warsaw Pact, there were objections from East Germany and Poland, who did not want to get dragged into what seemed to be a pointless plan for war with China. Kruschev's son in law was sent to West Germany, where he, apparently acting in Nikita Sergeyevich's name, offered that the Soviet Union would withdraw its support for East Germany and allow reunification of the Germanies--and support German re-annexation of the territories lost to Poland in 1945 if Gomulka still complained.
 

Garrison

Donor
Apparently, Krushchev was willing to risk it--during his effort to bring Mongolia into the Warsaw Pact, there were objections from East Germany and Poland, who did not want to get dragged into what seemed to be a pointless plan for war with China. Kruschev's son in law was sent to West Germany, where he, apparently acting in Nikita Sergeyevich's name, offered that the Soviet Union would withdraw its support for East Germany and allow reunification of the Germanies--and support German re-annexation of the territories lost to Poland in 1945 if Gomulka still complained.
News of such talks doubtless reached the GDR swiftly and persuaded them to tow the line, which was doubtless the reason for making the suggestion. besides I can't see the FRG agreeing to such terms, especially not as NATO member and a pretty solid democracy by that point.
 
Apparently, Krushchev was willing to risk it--during his effort to bring Mongolia into the Warsaw Pact, there were objections from East Germany and Poland, who did not want to get dragged into what seemed to be a pointless plan for war with China. Kruschev's son in law was sent to West Germany, where he, apparently acting in Nikita Sergeyevich's name, offered that the Soviet Union would withdraw its support for East Germany and allow reunification of the Germanies--and support German re-annexation of the territories lost to Poland in 1945 if Gomulka still complained.
Yow, I've never heard of this. Where was this said?
 
A perhaps “soft” Fourth Reich is possible - if all the Germanic states were to decide to form together as a counter to European unity and form their own union, it could be feasible. Why they would do that I’m not entirely clear on; I do know Germany is a strong economic nation and may feel that other European nations would just step on their toes. So they join forces with the likes of Austria and maybe some other neighbors (Norway/Sweden/Denmark or perhaps the Czech Republic or something.)

It would almost certainly not be authoritarian, even if it maybe is more protectionist and geared toward economic development. A scenario of an economically ambitions Germany (I’m picturing the expansionist, nationalist spirit of Germany in the 1930s redone to mean one thing and one thing alone - economic growth. In other words, they wouldn’t give a shit what race you are or even where you were born; if you’re in Germany, your goal is to make a fuckton of money, like Japan during the postwar years except more ethnically heterogeneous.)
 
News of such talks doubtless reached the GDR swiftly and persuaded them to tow the line, which was doubtless the reason for making the suggestion. besides I can't see the FRG agreeing to such terms, especially not as NATO member and a pretty solid democracy by that point.
Yow, I've never heard of this. Where was this said?
It also very quickly returned to Moscow and was one of the reasons Kruschev was deposed.

Even worse, at the beginning of September 1964, the West German press announced that Khrushchev was planning to visit Bonn.[33] The announcement came after a series of denials by Khrushchev that he had any such plans. Both Gomulka and Ulbricht were worried that Khrushchev, given his concerns about a potential conflict with China, might compromise their security interests in order to reach an agreement with West Germany. The visit by Khrushchev's son-in-law, Alexei Adzhubei, to Bonn at the end of July 1964 confirmed their worst fears. Polish and East German intelligence, concerned that Khrushchev might be planning a radical departure in his West German policy, closely followed Adzhubei's movements.[34] They did not have to look far to find disturbing information. The West German newsmagazine, Der Spiegel, reported some of Adzhubei's more heterodox statements. Throughout his trip, he constantly warned against the "yellow peril."[35] China, he declared, would be Moscow's "first front" from now on. In order to have a free hand for dealing with the Chinese, Moscow sought a modus vivendi with Bonn in the "spirit of Rapallo."[36] In a private discussion over Bavarian beer with the bête noire of Soviet-bloc propaganda, Franz Josef Strauss, Adzhubei put it more bluntly. "We'd just as soon give you Germans a hundred hydrogen bombs, form a corridor through the Soviet Union, and let you mop up the Chinese."[37] When discussions turned to Ulbricht, Adzhubei stated point-blank: He would not live much longer, he suffered from cancer.[38] Polish intelligence succeeded in obtaining tapes from "Western journalists" of some of Adzhubei's choicer comments. The famous son-in-law apparently declared on tape that when his "papa" came to the FRG and saw how friendly everybody was, he would tear down the Berlin Wall.[39] Of greater interest to the Poles was his comment that under favorable conditions — for example, if Warsaw tried to leave the socialist bloc—land could be sliced off and returned to Germany, beginning with Szczecin.[40]

After listening to the tapes of Adzhubei's comments, Gomulka was furious.[41] He fired off a protest to Moscow. On 30 September 1964, Yuri Andropov, the Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee responsible for relations with the socialist states, arrived in Warsaw to discuss the situation.[42] Gomulka's trusted lieutentant, Zenon Kliszko, played for Andropov the Polish tape of Adzhubei's conversations. Andropov considered the tape to be authentic; he returned to Moscow with a transcript.[43] The fallout from Adzhubei's visit could not have come at a worse time for Khrushchev. In September 1964, his opponents in the Soviet leadership were already plotting to overthrow him.[44] The tape was used to further discredit Khrushchev and his policies and to help justify his removal from power in October 1964.

 

Deleted member 169412

Poland tries to break away from the Eastern Bloc in 1956 and East Germany "saves the day". Russia hands Szczecin over to East Germany (which I remember them talking about doing if Poland tried anything like that) and East Germany becomes more nationalist than OTL as a result.
 
Poland tries to break away from the Eastern Bloc in 1956 and East Germany "saves the day". Russia hands Szczecin over to East Germany (which I remember them talking about doing if Poland tried anything like that) and East Germany becomes more nationalist than OTL as a result.

I can't East Germany playing much of major role on potential Polish revolt. But getting Stettin back might be possible.
 

Deleted member 169412

I can't East Germany playing much of major role on potential Polish revolt. But getting Stettin back might be possible.
I'm sure Stettin was always on the table if Poland decided to rise up.

Anything more than that I can't see as realistic given that lots of Poland's industry was located in the "Recovered Territories" and handing them over to Germany would cripple Poland economically.
 

kham_coc

Banned
I'm sure Stettin was always on the table if Poland decided to rise up.

Anything more than that I can't see as realistic given that lots of Poland's industry was located in the "Recovered Territories" and handing them over to Germany would cripple Poland economically.
I'm not sure that the Soviets would care at that point. It could also be a fait acompli where the gdr simply moves in and says we aren't leaving. I doubt that the Soviets would expend capital, political or military, to save the poles from a greater punishment than they were already due for.
 

Nebogipfel

Monthly Donor
I'm not sure that the Soviets would care at that point. It could also be a fait acompli where the gdr simply moves in and says we aren't leaving. I doubt that the Soviets would expend capital, political or military, to save the poles from a greater punishment than they were already due for.
In 1956 WWII was just 11 years away. Memory of the Ostfront was *very* fresh, the last German POW were just released a year ago. Just 3 years ago the soviets sent troops to put down demonstrations in the GDR. In other words, it is not very probable that the SU will do even their part of Germany any bigger favor. And the GDR acting *militarily* without consulting Moscow would not go down very well - the soviets would probably see this as open challenge to their control and act very decisively.
 
IMO, the only way for this to happen is if socialists (or at least Social Democrats) take power in West Germany in the 1950s, the height of the US Red Scare. In OTL, the US successfully supported Conrad Adenauer and his Christian Democrats. But what if the SPD gained a majority in the Bundestag? Then Erich Ollenhauer might have become Chancellor. He supported something called the Ollenhauer plan, which sought re-unification with the East under a collective security arrangement outside of NATO. This would have alarmed the American government. In that scenario, I could see the US covertly backing an ex-Nazi to lead a coup against Ollenhauer to prevent West Germany from falling to Communism (much like the CIA would later do with Allende in Chile). At that time, the US propped up many right-wing dictatorships in the name of stopping the spread of communism, so I think it's plausible.
 
Excuse me, what? Are you really comparing the EU to a genocidal fascist state which killed tens of millions?
From the Wikipedia article titled "Fourth Reich," section title "Usage to indicate German influence in the European Union"
"Some British commentators have used the term "Fourth Reich" to point at the influence that they believe Germany exerts within the European Union.[2][8][9] For example, Simon Heffer wrote in the Daily Mail that Germany's economic power, further boosted by the European financial crisis, is the "economic colonisation of Europe by stealth", whereby Berlin is using economic pressure rather than armies to "topple the leadership of a European nation". This, he says, constitutes the "rise of the Fourth Reich."[10] Likewise, Simon Jenkins of The Guardian wrote that it is "a massive irony that old Europe's last gasp should be to seek ... German supremacy".[10] According to Richard J. Evans of the New Statesman, this kind of language had not been heard since German reunification which sparked a wave of Germanophobic commentary.[10] In a counterbalancing perspective, the "Charlemagne" columnist at The Economist reports that the German hegemony perspective does not match reality.[11]

In August 2012, the Italian newspaper Il Giornale had as headline the phrase "Fourth Reich" (Quarto Reich) as a protest against German hegemony.[12]

This perspective gained particular traction in the United Kingdom in the run up to 2016 EU referendum and the subsequent negotiations.[13]"
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that I was making a joke about Germany's power in the EU.
 
Top