Inspired in part by this thread.
I'm not a railfan at all, so I have no clue how credible this is, hence the question. In the Depression, & presupposing a federal subsidy for doing it, was it credible to amalgamate Ontario &/or Quebec rail systems? Lower Mainland BC's?
Was it credible to link them to U.S. networks at, say, Seattle, Detroit, &/or Buffalo?
Was it credible to upgrade the rolling stock with a variety of aluminum (or steel monocoque?) tramcar? (I imagine a subsidized purchase or manufacturing, perhaps both.)
Could an amalgamated system of this kind make a profit? (I imagine routes along Lake Superior, for one, plus subsidized retracking to standardize guage, plus subsidized construction of flyover/unders as needed; the latter two would be obvious federal works projects at that time.)
Or is the Canadian market in light rail too small?
I'm not a railfan at all, so I have no clue how credible this is, hence the question. In the Depression, & presupposing a federal subsidy for doing it, was it credible to amalgamate Ontario &/or Quebec rail systems? Lower Mainland BC's?
Was it credible to link them to U.S. networks at, say, Seattle, Detroit, &/or Buffalo?
Was it credible to upgrade the rolling stock with a variety of aluminum (or steel monocoque?) tramcar? (I imagine a subsidized purchase or manufacturing, perhaps both.)
Could an amalgamated system of this kind make a profit? (I imagine routes along Lake Superior, for one, plus subsidized retracking to standardize guage, plus subsidized construction of flyover/unders as needed; the latter two would be obvious federal works projects at that time.)
Or is the Canadian market in light rail too small?