raharris1973
Gone Fishin'
How can we get Italy and Austria to make a swap wherein Italy gets at least the Italian-speaking majority areas of the Austro-Hungarian empire if not some additional historic claims and Italy yields up its colonies in Eritrea, Somalia (and if after 1912, Libya) to Austria-Hungary? You can actually set the PoD a bit pre-20th century as well, as early as the Italian Red Sea colonies.
In each state, who would object most vehemently, and who would be most supportive?
For the Austro-Hungarian, doing a trade that validates the principal could widely be considered a dangerous precedent. On the other hand, Austria-Hungary would not be giving up something for nothing in a territorial swap. If the Romanians or Serbs are encouraged by the example of Italy, I imagine the Austro-Hungarians would retort by asking them what they have of any value to trade for it.
Meanwhile, what substantive objections would their be in Italy. I mean they bled for their colonies, and think perhaps they should have the territory simply by virtue of nationality and history, but it strikes me that the emotional (and quite probably taxable) value of Trentino-South Tyrol and Istria exceeds the emotional value of East and North African spots for virtually all Italians, left to right.
Of course going against this, "prospect theory" says people are more repelled by prospective losses of something they have, than enticed by the prospect of something they do not have.
Anyway. If we make it happen, what are the longer-term consequences?
In each state, who would object most vehemently, and who would be most supportive?
For the Austro-Hungarian, doing a trade that validates the principal could widely be considered a dangerous precedent. On the other hand, Austria-Hungary would not be giving up something for nothing in a territorial swap. If the Romanians or Serbs are encouraged by the example of Italy, I imagine the Austro-Hungarians would retort by asking them what they have of any value to trade for it.
Meanwhile, what substantive objections would their be in Italy. I mean they bled for their colonies, and think perhaps they should have the territory simply by virtue of nationality and history, but it strikes me that the emotional (and quite probably taxable) value of Trentino-South Tyrol and Istria exceeds the emotional value of East and North African spots for virtually all Italians, left to right.
Of course going against this, "prospect theory" says people are more repelled by prospective losses of something they have, than enticed by the prospect of something they do not have.
Anyway. If we make it happen, what are the longer-term consequences?