If one was to gloss over the (end of the) End of History, the years following the Cold War saw the ostensibly left-liberal parties of Anglo-America win under the mantle of telegenic, triangulating, almost post-ideological charismatic young leaders who sought to continue the neoliberal consensus of the ‘80s with a sunny, middle-class consumer-friendly human face. (I wonder if there are any other contemporaries besides Clinton and Blair. ) Going into both respective elections, Bush and Major both had respectable approval ratings, and the latter was confident he would be elected.
So, what if they did? Does this mean the ‘80s don’t end? Not just in terms of economics, still under the Reaganite-Thatcherism paradigm, but under more socially conservative regimes? (See Dan Quayle’s issues with Murphy Brown and single motherhood, with MTV, the Simpsons).
So, what if they did? Does this mean the ‘80s don’t end? Not just in terms of economics, still under the Reaganite-Thatcherism paradigm, but under more socially conservative regimes? (See Dan Quayle’s issues with Murphy Brown and single motherhood, with MTV, the Simpsons).
Last edited: