This is interesting, because the results pretty resoundingly reject the the proposition, mooted over the years, that Yamamoto bringing Zuikaku along could have been a game changer. In fact, the Japanese still get smashed. The real difference maker, as it turns out, is Yorktown. As Parshall, Bongers, and Torres' analysis seems to consistently show, if the Americans bring all three carriers as they did OTL, the Japanese are going to get their asses kicked at Midway even if they bring all 5 intact KB fleet carriers
To be honest, i find the above statement rather bewildering regarding Zuikaku. Me i've always seen Parshall as heavily US biased in whatever he writes about Midway and other things, which a true historian should not be if he still want to be called a historian. History should be reported exactly as it was, not as one wants it to be.
Anyway the results of the wargame are skewed imo by the inclusion of this "good Hornet" thing, otherwise even according to Parshall as you can see Zuikaku's inclusion means 2 japanese carriers remain intact vs 1 US, in which case the US force will run for it to protect the remaining CV like it did at Coral Seal, Eastern Solomons and Santa Cruz. Midway was the only CV battle in 1942 in which the Japanese were running away, Zuikaku's presence could have easily changed that. Not to mention that looking at the battle's mechanics one can easily see how Zuikaku's presence could have resulted in ALL US carriers lost for 2 japanese ( Zuikaku would have brought 24-25 Zeros to the battle, with the present extra Zeros even a shotai could have say prevented Best from hitting Akagi, or maybe even he would have attacked and missed Zuikaku who knows, Zuikaku was faster, turned tighter, had better AA, faced US carriers before at Coral Sea and was "luckier"! So then you will have THREE very angry japanese CVs launching two devastating strikes against TF 17 and TF16, 3 times as large as the OTL strikes)
In that scenario (with KB temporaraily controling the seas around Midway) the landing on Midway is quite irrelevant even if it fails, because really the IJN came there to kill the US carriers. Hell, a repulsed landing on Midway might in the long run more beneficial for IJN by making then snap out of their complacency and underestimating the US side (like they did OTL at Guadalcanal)
What i also want to say about this Hornet and Mitscher pilloring though, not that i have any sympathy for either, but after reading some stuff and seeing some maps, imo Mitscher sent Ring on course 265 because Nimitz and intel told him so. In other words Nimitz and intel told them that KB will operate in two groups, one about 80-100 miles behind the other. So after the dawn PBY spotting of 2 japanese CVs, Mitscher logically assumed the other two are 100 miles behind, just as the intel says. Up to date the intel has been spot on, so why would he not continue to believe it? I bet that looking at the map Ring ended up about 100 miles from Nagumo's position when he eventually turned, maybe someone more knowledgeable can measure that.
If there is one other thing that i find bewildering is Waldron's literal mutiny during wartime, he killed himself and his men for nothing. If he would have obeyed Ring and just stay in formation, yes eventually he would have had to turn back to Hornet, about the same time as the VF-8 i guess, but at least he would have saved his men, and possibly helped most or all VF-8 return too (if they see and follow Waldron to Hornet). Though i wonder where VF-6 would go in this scenario. I know Waldron's actions has been spun by USN as MOH bravery etc. but makes one wonder if was it really necessary to do what he did, or just pigheadedness. I also read that relations between Ring and the other pilots/commanders were not terribly good to put it mildly (not exactly a band of brothers, to quote Lundstrom), so perhaps that played a part. Miscommunication could be another or on top of everything else, maybe neither Ring nor Mitscher bothered to tell Waldron WHY they go on 265 (because there should be 2 carriers there according to intel)
There is indeed the issue of how the battle mechanics would have been affected if VT-8 did not attack, maybe VT-6 and VT-3 are completely wiped out instead, but that's still a net gain of about 10 TBDs and 8-10 F4Fs. Hell, maybe a few more of Mitchell's VF-8 fighters above Yorktown would have prevented one or both torpedo hits, so then perhaps it's not Mitscher who sank the Yorktown, but Waldron!