Agree! Wow...let's see how it happens!..in OTL 1990, Argentina reached the final with a big quote of luck and epic, due the squad was plagued with several injuries....only Troglio, Caniggia and Goycochea can considered themselves in really top form...the most famous case was Maradona's ankle and the stomped toe, and you can count Oscar Ruggeri's pubalgia or the muscular injuries of Julio Olarticoechea and Jorge Burruchaga, to name a few.... hence why Argentina used negative tactics, simply they did what they can, not what they wanted. Argentina, perhaps, wasn't superior to any of his rivals, but none of their rivals was superior to Argentina except Brazil, and Germany but this last in terms of ball possessions...not in clear goal chances, and that argentina played with 4 line-up, usual players, less (Batista, Olarticochea, Giusti and Caniggia)...and Ruggeri that was substitued by Monzon after 1st half because he was in extreme pain.Brazil vs Netherlands
Spain vs West Germany
Ireland vs Cameroon
Italy vs Poland
Scotland vs Mexico
Belgium vs Uruguay
Argentina vs Czechoslovakia
France vs England
Something I consider for the future (that may impact 1994 tournament) is different fate of Maradona after tournament. Do you think it would help him if he stayed in Napoli for longer?Agree! Wow...let's see how it happens!..in OTL 1990, Argentina reached the final with a big quote of luck and epic, due the squad was plagued with several injuries....only Troglio, Caniggia and Goycochea can considered themselves in really top form...the most famous case was Maradona's ankle and the stomped toe, and you can count Oscar Ruggeri's pubalgia or the muscular injuries of Julio Olarticoechea and Jorge Burruchaga, to name a few.... hence why Argentina used negative tactics, simply they did what they can, not what they wanted. Argentina, perhaps, wasn't superior to any of his rivals, but none of their rivals was superior to Argentina except Brazil, and Germany but this last in terms of ball possessions...not in clear goal chances, and that argentina played with 4 line-up, usual players, less (Batista, Olarticochea, Giusti and Caniggia)...and Ruggeri that was substitued by Monzon after 1st half because he was in extreme pain.
So, if Argentinian squad would have been able to came in good shape, I dare to say that results could be different... this 1st place in round robin opened an interesting scenario....
For me, one of Bilardo's biggest mistake, was not to take to Italy to a 20 year old Diego Simeone (dispatched in the eve of the list) and to not to insist for Fernando Redondo, after Redondo quit in 1989 due personal reasons... This two players, would have been an interesting fresh air of football and force in that squad.
@Jan Olbracht , congratulations for your TL!
Maradona had everything ready to go to Olympique de Marseille in 1989, but Napoli president Corrado Ferlaino told him, "if I let you go, they'll kill me" (he told him after Napoli won UEFA CUP in 1989, and captured by the TV cameras, although not the audio) ... so he didn't let him go. Napoli loved Maradona, still loves him, but Napoli city did not let him breathe and live, in addition to that, his relationships with the rest of Italy and his great mouth to declare, made things worse, not counting his addictions. Hence, he wanted to go to a more "calm" football. When Italia 90 arrives, it was the breaking point, as they booed the Argentinian anthem in each game (they actually booed Maradona), the famous screenshot of Maradona yelling "sons of bitches, sons of bitches", in the final against Germany is the perfect sample. Italia 90 was the inevitable breaking down point in the relationship between Italy and Maradona. From there, the protection and especially as Maradona wanted to flee from Italy, did the rest. Some say that the doping of March 1991 was the sign of the end of the protection, added to the fact that he was also sought by Maradona, to leave Italy without weighing the consequences. I think that things for Maradona would have been better if he had gone to Olympique in 1989, although the main mistake was the contract that Maradona signed in 1987, until 1993, at the expense of his Manager Guillermo Coppola, who thought that being at the time in that they were, it was the best ... if they had signed it for 2 years, as was the initial intention, much would have been different later.Something I consider for the future (that may impact 1994 tournament) is different fate of Maradona after tournament. Do you think it would help him if he stayed in Napoli for longer?
I'm asking as I have a bit longer Maradona's era in plans. Although I want to avoid spoilers here, so I may ask you some questions via PM?Maradona had everything ready to go to Olympique de Marseille in 1989, but Napoli president Corrado Ferlaino told him, "if I let you go, they'll kill me" (he told him after Napoli won UEFA CUP in 1989, and captured by the TV cameras, although not the audio) ... so he didn't let him go. Napoli loved Maradona, still loves him, but Napoli city did not let him breathe and live, in addition to that, his relationships with the rest of Italy and his great mouth to declare, made things worse, not counting his addictions. Hence, he wanted to go to a more "calm" football. When Italia 90 arrives, it was the breaking point, as they booed the Argentinian anthem in each game (they actually booed Maradona), the famous screenshot of Maradona yelling "sons of bitches, sons of bitches", in the final against Germany is the perfect sample. Italia 90 was the inevitable breaking down point in the relationship between Italy and Maradona. From there, the protection and especially as Maradona wanted to flee from Italy, did the rest. Some say that the doping of March 1991 was the sign of the end of the protection, added to the fact that he was also sought by Maradona, to leave Italy without weighing the consequences. I think that things for Maradona would have been better if he had gone to Olympique in 1989, although the main mistake was the contract that Maradona signed in 1987, until 1993, at the expense of his Manager Guillermo Coppola, who thought that being at the time in that they were, it was the best ... if they had signed it for 2 years, as was the initial intention, much would have been different later.
Yes of course!, you can ask me PMI'm asking as I have a bit longer Maradona's era in plans. Although I want to avoid spoilers here, so I may ask you some questions via PM?