1974 special presidential election

What would be the legal basis for a "special election" for President? The Constitution doesn't provide for it, and in fact it specifically sets up a non-electoral chain of succession if the presidency falls vacant.

No it doesn't. It just empowers Congress to provide for the succession after the VP.

It also states that the officer so designated shall serve "until a President shall be elected" but does not specify that this election must be four years after the previous one. It lays down that POTUS and VP are chosen for the same term of four years, but does not say that any successor after the VP is necessarily so chosen.
 
Random Democrat would definit win the Special election. But what would happen 1978? Had the economy become worser since 1974? And would there be a different attitude to the Fall of Saigon? I mean, theoreticall the GOP could say; "We managed to make it a draw. And then the Democrats came and lost the War!"
 
Unemployment wasn't that high in late '78 but energy issues and staginflation were still issues and affected the Dems negatively in the Congressional elections.

The Democrats will have a grace period from '75-'77 at least, though, to pass a lot. Likely a veto-proof majority unless the Southern Democrats revolt (they gave Reagan leverage early on).
 
No it doesn't. It just empowers Congress to provide for the succession after the VP.

It also states that the officer so designated shall serve "until a President shall be elected" but does not specify that this election must be four years after the previous one. It lays down that POTUS and VP are chosen for the same term of four years, but does not say that any successor after the VP is necessarily so chosen.
The Presidential Succession Act of 1947 is very specific in laying out who becomes President when the office becomes vacant for any reason. After V-P, Speaker and President pro tempore, it falls to the Cabinet members in order of the creation of their departments, starting with Secretary of State. Nowhere in the Constitution is there any provision for a special election to fill a presidential vacancy.
 
If events moved faster in 74 and Nixon was not able to get a VP I can see Congress passing a new succession act, if need be over Ticky Dicky's veto, before impeaching convicting and removing from office.
 

GeographyDude

Gone Fishin'
Now remember, there's almost four months between when Ford nominates Rocky to be his V.P. and Congressional confirmation.

So, Ford could have a heart attack. Or more interesting, since it's still underappreciated, Ford has a stroke. Even today, some doctors think people don't take this seriously enough and call it a 'brain attack' to try to get people to take it more seriously.

And the standard advice is if a person feels weakness or numbness on part of one side of the body, such as weakness in one arm or one side of the face drooping, to get to the hospital as quickly as they can. The hospital uses imagery to rule out a bleeding stroke and then gives the clot-busting drug (the little bit scary part is that imagery of blockage stroke won't show up for a couple of days, so it's based on symptoms)

Well, none of this was present in 1974. So, Ford is largely still there but he's disabled. He resigns. Carl Albert assumes the presidency. But he states he does not feel he was at all elected by the American people. He pushes Congress to call for a special election just for the remainder of the term till 1976. . . .
 
Now remember, there's almost four months between when Ford nominates Rocky to be his V.P. and Congressional confirmation.

So, Ford could have a heart attack. Or more interesting, since it's still underappreciated, Ford has a stroke. Even today, some doctors think people don't take this seriously enough and call it a 'brain attack' to try to get people to take it more seriously.

And the standard advice is if a person feels weakness or numbness on part of one side of the body, such as weakness in one arm or one side of the face drooping, to get to the hospital as quickly as they can. The hospital uses imagery to rule out a bleeding stroke and then gives the clot-busting drug (the little bit scary part is that imagery of blockage stroke won't show up for a couple of days, so it's based on symptoms)

Well, none of this was present in 1974. So, Ford is largely still there but he's disabled. He resigns. Carl Albert assumes the presidency. But he states he does not feel he was at all elected by the American people. He pushes Congress to call for a special election just for the remainder of the term till 1976. . . .

He can push, but Congress has no authority to call for this special election. If Albert doesn't wish to or cannot serve until January 20, 1977, he can resign after his VP selection is confirmed OR resign and let whom ever is next in line according to the 1947 Presidential Succession Act assume the office of the Presidency.
 
He can push, but Congress has no authority to call for this special election. If Albert doesn't wish to or cannot serve until January 20, 1977, he can resign after his VP selection is confirmed OR resign and let whom ever is next in line according to the 1947 Presidential Succession Act assume the office of the Presidency.
What would prevent Congress from passing a new Presidential Succession Act, which include a special election?
 
What would prevent Congress from passing a new Presidential Succession Act, which include a special election?
Why would they need or want to, when the one already in effect solves the problem? Besides, a non-Constitutional special election would trigger all sorts of legal challenges and call into question any decision or law signed by whoever wins the election. The last thing Congress would want in this situation is any doubt about the legality the office.
 
Why would they need or want to, when the one already in effect solves the problem? Besides, a non-Constitutional special election would trigger all sorts of legal challenges and call into question any decision or law signed by whoever wins the election. The last thing Congress would want in this situation is any doubt about the legality the office.

Because impeaching Nixon and removing him from office to put in a Democrat without an election would look wrong
 
Top