In 1896 New Zealand was the first part of the British Empire to grant women the vote. In 1907 it achieved near independence when it became a dominion. Now suppose that at that time the New Zealand government decided to make a point with the Mother Country and appoint a woman to be be High Commissioner in London (Effectively the New Zealand Ambassador to the Court of St James). This is at a time when the very idea of female suffrage is to say the least controversial and the radical Suffragettes are turning to terrorist tactics.
Why they did this is not what I'm asking about, but the consequences.
(Alright I know this is highly unlikely, but it's also in character for Kiwi's to be bloody minded enough to do this with the right provocation)
Why they did this is not what I'm asking about, but the consequences.
(Alright I know this is highly unlikely, but it's also in character for Kiwi's to be bloody minded enough to do this with the right provocation)
Last edited: