Tales of the Decades of Darkness #4: Beneath The Three Trees
Credit for this post goes to Analytical Engine, who wrote most of it apart from the Alvar O’Brien and Indian sections and a few other editorial additions.
* * *
Extracts from: “A History of the Modern World, Volume 2: After the Great War”
By Mark J. Epworth
The period following the end of the Great War in 1933 [1] is often described as beginning of the Superpower Period. It is marked by the dissolution of the British Empire and the creation of vast, sometimes overlapping spheres of influence in the Old World and American territorial hegemony in the New World.
As is so often the case with popular perceptions of history, much more underlies the beginning of this period. The boundary between the Age of Empires and the Age of Superpowers is blurred; it was in essence a gradual transition rather than an abrupt change from one era to another.
While it is true that the empires that exemplified the nineteenth and early twentieth century gave way to the tripolar world of spheres of influence, there is no singular definition of a superpower. Each is different, and each should be considered individually, not as a collective.
Many people, particularly from those same Superpowers, think of the world as divided between the three great states of Russia, Germany and the United States. Yet the bloc comprising the Restored Empire, Nippon and, to some extent, the Republic of China can also be thought of as a half-superpower. Indeed, if this bloc had a shared sovereignty, it could almost be considered as a fourth Superpower.
Chapter 2: The Russian Federation
As the largest country in the world, Russia is the epitome of the modern idea of a Superpower. Formed in the aftermath of the Great War, the Russian Federation is the final product of the evolution of the Russian Empire and its Asian sphere of influence.
Begun as a federation between Russia, Finland, and Thrace & Marmara – all of which have the Tsar as head of state – and the states of Courland, Bulgaria, Bokhara, Khiva, Tuva and Tibet, it has since evolved into a more complex union of states that covers much of Asia and large parts of Europe.
The 1930s were a period of cautious experimentation in Russia, to determine whether the idea of federation would work, and if so how best to implement it. As it transpired, the transition to federation worked very effectively; Russia proper became more ethnically and religiously homogenous, and the other regions gained whichever level of autonomy and internal border controls [2] suited both their inhabitants’ and the federal government’s interests.
Those new member states admitted during the 1940s were all carved from Russia proper. The external states dominated by the Bear were, during this period, considered ill-suited for inclusion within the Federation, though each of them had close economic (and sometimes military) ties with Saint Petersburg.
The first new member admitted to the Federation was Mongolia, in March 1940. The mostly Buddhist region had been an integrated tributary state under the Khan in Urga [3], and had been expanded into Inner Mongolia following the Great War. Mongolia was granted an equivalent level of autonomy as the Emirate of Bokhara and the Khanate of Khiva. It was joined by the Khanate of Kokand [4] in June 1943.
Persistent agitation from the Turkmen peoples of Transcapia, who had long suffered from exploitation by corrupt local administrators, saw Transcapia admitted as a federated state in September 1945, with the then-unique provision that all revenues earned in Transcapia had to be spent in that state.
The region of Ice Jecen [5] had been acquired from Qing China well before the Great War, but then been largely neglected by Russia during that time. Few would-be Russian settlers found Ice Jecen an attractive destination, and the native Uighur peoples were largely left to rule themselves. Ice Jecen was declared a federated state in November 1948 largely to formalise its already separate status, and to allow it to restrict Han immigration.
Plans to establish Manchuria [6] as a federated state were discussed several times, particularly during the late 1930s, but were ultimately discarded. The region had become plurality Russian by that period, and those inhabitants were willing to remain part of Russia proper. The native Manchu, Han and Chosen [Korean] peoples were less enthusiastic about this decision, but they had only a limited political voice.
Dealing with the various minority peoples in Europe became a more difficult proposition. Most of these regions had been part of the Russian Empire for centuries, not decades, formal separation at the level of Finland was considered anathema to traditionalists within Russia.
However, nationalist concerns had been awakened in Europe by the experiment of Federation and the example of Courland. Of particular concern to many of the inhabitants was the spread of the Russian language and the perceived influx of wealthy Great Russians displacing local businessmen. As a means of appeasement, the Duma created “special regions” in the provinces of Estonia, Livonia, and the areas inhabited by Georgians and Armenians.
The special regions were granted local political assemblies with authority to set immigration quotas and related laws. In the case of Estonia and Livonia, this sufficed to calm local agitation. In Georgia and Armenia, the assemblies instead sought additional powers. These were progressively granted, and eventually Armenia [in July 1946] and Georgia [in February 1947] were created as federated states, although the Tsar remained the head of state.
Although formally annexed a century before, the Danube Principalities had a long tradition of de facto autonomy. So the shift to federated states was a straightforward extension of that tradition; Moldavia and Wallachia were recognised in June 1941, with the Tsar as their head of state.
Externally, Serbia, while still a joint Russo-German sphere of influence, entered into a bilateral economic treaty with Russia in 1944. Hellas [Greece] signed a similar treaty a year later. More out of concern over Germany rather than fondness for her eastern neighbour, Sweden entered a similar agreement in 1946.
Chapter 3: The United States of America
Much like Russia, the United States of America is a territorial behemoth, spanning from Alaska in the north to Tierra del Fuego in the south, even discounting its claims to the Antarctic. In its nature, though, the USA is almost the inverse of the Great Bear. Russia is a federation of states which are theoretically subject to the ultimate rule of Saint Petersburg but in practice are often allowed to rule themselves. The United States is a republic which is formally comprised of sovereign states, but which in practice lost all of their meaningful power to the central government many years ago.
The extension of American hegemony over the entirety of the Americas is a desire which has existed for as long as the United States. The US gains of the Great War simply marked the greatest phase of this expansion. By 1934, the United States had already integrated all of its older acquisitions as states, except for the lightly-populated Lesser Antilles and Suriname. They still faced the challenges of integrating some of their newer acquisitions; their gains from the North American War had still not been completely settled, and now they had the much greater task of subduing the vastness of South America.
Quelling the formerly independent states of Costa Rica, Colombia, and Venezuela had been a labour of decades. They had determinedly fought the initial invasion, and maintained a dedicated campaign of resistance [7] thereafter. Successive US presidents tried to use both compromise and retribution to end the resistance.
In the immediate aftermath of the Great War, with the resistance largely quelled, it appeared that these territories would soon be admitted as full states. This admission was blocked by the staunch opposition of President O’Brien, who believed that it would destabilise his response to the broader labour shifts that were overtaking the United States during this period. The introduction of the mechanised cotton-picker had slashed demand for slave labour, with flow-on declines in slave and peon prices, and this meant that for almost the first time in its history, the United States had a surplus of indentured labour [8].
In this uncertain climate, the admission of new states would have meant an end to all occupation laws and any restrictions on the movement of indentured labour northward. O’Brien vetoed the proposed admission of Costa Rica in 1936, the first time an American president had prevented the admission of a new state. The only states which would be admitted during his tenure would be Suriname in 1937, the Antilles [9] in 1938 and Alaska in 1939.
During the O’Brien years, American actions in South America were much more focused on establishing administrative stability. In particular, the United States developed a new citizenship system which would preserve her social control and racial hierarchy without allowing a flood of peon and slave labour northward.
The American gains in the Great War were thus organised into administrative forms which suited these new needs. In 1936, Peru was partitioned into the territories of Trujillo, Lima and Arequipa [10]. The Brazilian military districts of Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo [11] were converted into territories in 1937, while in 1938 Chile was divided into the territories of Santiago and Concepcion [12]. Charcas was for much longer administered as a semi-sovereign protectorate, and would not be formally annexed as a territory until 1943.
Within this greater territorial hegemony, the United States set about imposing its usual racial hierarchy, but in a new form to suit its changed conditions. During the previous era of the informal American empire, new acquisitions had been administered in forms which allowed the creation of slaves, peons, and other forms of indentured labour.
In their post-Great War gains, the United States created the familiar racial hierarchy, but with a different emphasis than in their older acquisitions. Where before Americans would often be more generous in considering whether to deem new inhabitants as white and grant them citizenship, now the classification of being white was much harder to obtain.
At the bottom of the American racial classification were, as always, those deemed to be black. They had no legal rights, and in theory could be turned into slaves by anyone willing to do so, but with a United States facing an oversupply of slaves, this was rarely thought an attractive proposition. Instead, the blacks in the new territories were marginalised, relegated to the lowest echelons of society and the most menial forms of labour, and strongly encouraged to emigrate to [Republican] Brazil or Argentina.
This left a great many inhabitants in an awkward middle, either of Amerindian or mixed heritage, or sometimes with white ancestry but deemed too disloyal for full citizenship. For this class of people, President O’Brien is reported to have said “Let them have their Latin rights”, and introduced a new form of citizenship: Territorial citizenship.
Territorial citizenship meant that its holders – soon colloquially shortened to tets – had recognised but restricted legal rights. In particular, they were able to hold property and were not subject to indenture except in specific legal circumstances, although they had no voting rights.
The crucial limitation of Territorial citizenship was that it was restricted to a given U.S. Territory; tets who voluntarily moved outside of those borders lost those rights, unless they moved to another US territory which had mutual recognition of Territorial citizenship. Territorial citizenship was applied across the post-Great War gains, and most of those Territories gave mutual recognition to tets, except for Concepcion.
Tets thus were, and still are, effectively prevented from moving into actual American states, for there they will be subject to the older forms of American citizenship, where they were be likely to find themselves treated as peons, with rights which are virtually non-existent. This restriction caused (and still causes) ongoing debate within the United States, but it remains in place to the present day as a means of keeping their territorial hegemony while still sustaining their established social order.
In the 1940s, the economic situation stabilised, with the rise of the new American industrialism. Labour prices were now lower, allowing cheap indentured labour to be used in low-cost manufacturing in conditions which would be considered unacceptable in the more humane societies of the other superpowers [13].
In this climate, and with new political leadership, the expansion of the labour pool with more peons and slaves was no longer considered a problem. So the other long-ruled territories were admitted as states during this decade. Costa Rica was first in 1941, and when this proved to cause no major problems, Antioquía and Panama followed in 1943, Caracas in 1944, Maracaibo and Quito in 1945, Buenaventura in 1946, Orinoco in 1947, and finally Amazonia in 1948.
Chapter 4: Germany and the Greater European Economic Union
Germany is by far the smallest – and, by nearly seventy years, the youngest [14] – of the three traditional Superpowers. It is also in many ways the most distinct. Unlike the titanic Russian Federation and the monolithic United States, both of which fit the view of a superpower as a unified state, Germany instead relies on a sphere of influence to exert its dominance over Europe and North Africa.
Like so many other institutions, the Greater European Economic Union was created in the aftermath of the Great War. The struggle against the bonds of its predecessor, the European Union, had been the trigger for the war, and the new GEEU was meant to be a more stable replacement. Yet despite its name, the GEEU is not just a trading bloc, but even more a political creation...
Formed in 1934 from the core of the old European Union members of Germany, Hungary, Croatia and Poland, the GEEU also included Denmark, England, Scotland, Cymru and the Italies as full founding members. The status of associate membership includes most of the economic benefits but fewer of the political liabilities, and Montenegro, Albania and Aragon become associate members at the founding.
Since its founding, the GEEU has gradually spread to encompass almost all of Europe outside of the Federation. Montenegro became a full member in 1940, with Albania following in 1942. Castile joined as an associate member in 1941, followed by Norway in 1946. Sweden and Hellas have never formally joined the GEEU, although both nations have trade agreements. Ireland became an associate member in 1949 for similar economic reasons, although it continued to maintain a stubborn political separation.
Despite both blandishments and veiled threats, Portugal maintained its separation from the GEEU. Relations improved to the point where Portugal accepted (in principle) the transfer of the Aragonese Congo to Germany in 1943 [15], but Portugal continued to rely on its own colonial possessions and its ties to the United States.
The states comprising the former France have long been the most troublesome part of the German sphere of influence. Notionally France had been separated into new separate states in 1936, but in practice these new states remained under military rule. Insurgencies and resistance campaigns by French nationalist and reunification groups continue to the present in some regions, although they reached their peak during the late 1930s and early 1940s.
Brittany possessed the most distinct sense of separation of any of the former French states. Civilian rule was established in 1941, with associate member status following in 1943, and full membership in 1950.
Inspired in part by an Occitan revival, and in part by a lingering sense of betrayal from the former central French government, the southern states of Languedoc and Gascony were next to stabilise. German occupation troops were progressively withdrawn save from a couple of military bases, and full civilian rule was restored to both states in 1945. The two states became associate members in 1946, and full members in 1952.
By 1948, Burgundy and Auvergne were also considered stable enough that German troops were withdrawn to their bases, and those states returned to effective civilian rule. Associate membership followed in 1951. Pro-reunification and nationalistic elements in the remaining states of former France continued to resist any bids to join the GEEU...
Although usually referred to as first among the Superpowers, Germany would be more accurately described as one of the last of the imperial powers (along with Portugal). The Great War saw all of its old imperial dominions stripped away, except for Libya, but a new colonial empire was created in that war. As well as expansion within Europe, Germany acquired a new colonial sphere in North Africa.
Administration of these new acquisitions as full colonies quickly proved to be more troublesome than it was worth for a Germany still preoccupied with mainland Europe. Morocco, which had previously been an established kingdom, was admitted into the now-misnamed Greater European Economic Union as an associate member in 1942, and Egypt was first granted limited self-rule and established as an associate member in 1950.
Within Germany itself, its Great War gains provided their own challenges of administration. The Italian gains were governed as two military districts until 1939, when the process began to convert them into new provinces.
As an intended aid to stability, Frankfurt looked to the old dynastic houses which had been deprived of their traditional states during the wars of Italian unification. The leading members of those families, now residing in the Swiss states, had a keen interest in seeing their family restored to their old dominions. After some cursory diplomacy and some polite acceptances from the Italies, Germany decided to restore the old families.
The House of Austria-Este, now rulers of Aargau, nominated a cousin of the then-Duke to become the new Duke of Modena. Similarly, the Duke of Lucerne, from the house of Bourbon-Parma, chose his elder son to become Duke of Parma, while his second son became the heir to the Swiss Duchy.
The remainder of Germany’s Italian acquisitions offered more problems. The traditional rulers of this region were the House of Savoy, who were now the rulers of South Italy. Since that dynasty was unacceptable to German interests, other German noble families were invited to offer candidates. The Swiss branch of the House of Habsburg-Lorraine provided a nephew of the current ruler of the Three Duchies [16], who became King of Piedmont, Duke of Savoy and Prince of Nice. The Swiss branch of the House of Saxe-Coburg provided the second son of the Grand Duke of Zurich, who became the Duke of Genoa, mirroring the title of Doge used there before the First Napoleonic War.
Germany’s new acquisitions from France were far more difficult to govern. French nationalistic and reunification sentiment still ran high, and German occupation forces and their local supporters were prime assassination targets. Moreover, while some German states had traditional claims over small parts of the former France [17], the local sentiments in the former France were as much more anti-monarchical than they were anti-German. The German government in Frankfurt drew the inevitable conclusion that installing new monarchs would make the task of assimilation more difficult, not less.
The new German acquisitions had originally been divided into three military districts, a state of affairs which Frankfurt wanted to end quickly. Given the strong republican sentiment, the Blucher [18] government divided these districts into several republican states whose borders closely resembled the former medieval states that had been used to divide the rest of France.
The southern district was divided into the states of Provence and Lyonnais. The central district was divided into the states of Lower Burgundy, Lorraine and Champagne. The northern district was divided into the states of Picardy, Soissons and Upper Normandy [19].
Chapter 5: The Restored Empire
Forged from the shards of the British Empire, the Restored Empire was created in 1934, with the King of Australia assuming the nominal title of Emperor. Due to the circumstances of its birth, the Empire has always been forced to steer a careful path between the twin dangers of too much centralisation – which would alienate its diverse constituents – and too much separation – which would eliminate its utility as a common economic, cultural and military bloc.
At its inception, the founding states of the Empire – Australia, South Africa, and Ceylon – agreed that all of the territories of the former British Empire, including its Great War acquisitions, should be granted independence. The planned timetable established 1939 as the independence date for the former British colonies, and 1943 for the formerly German ones.
Until independence, the regions of the Empire were divided between the three founding members. Each sphere of the Empire would be shaped by its initial relationship to these states.
Long before the transition period was over, the Empire gained its first new member and faced its first great crisis. Ireland joined the Empire in June 1935, gaining a notional protection from German threats, and just in time for the great crisis.
India, populous and diverse, had been on its own path to independence since before the Great War. It had never been considered as a candidate to join the Restored Empire, both because of its own independent-mindedness, and since its population would dwarf every other member state.
Crisis arose all the same, however, because of the contentious question of the princely states. Colonial India had been divided into directly ruled territories, and over five hundred princely states, with varying degrees of actual sovereignty. Along with independence, the Bharati National Congress wanted “One Bharat”, meaning one language, one national identity, and, according to some of the whispers, one religion, too.
The princely states did not fit into the BNC’s vision of a new Bharat, where the former colonial divisions would be abolished and a new federal republic created. Out of necessity in some cases, and in apparently genuine egalitarianism in other cases, most of the princely states were prepared to join the new Bharat.
In southern India, the Nizam of Hyderabad wanted no part of what he saw as over-zealous nationalists who wanted to purify India according to their own wishes. Privately, he is said to have described them as “India’s answer to vitalism”. Popular among his subjects, and with a strong local base of manufacturing to support him, the Nizam was prepared to fight rather than be forced to join the new Bharat.
In the independence negotiations at New Delhi, Hyderabad’s delegation made their ruler’s position clear, albeit couched in more diplomatic phrase. The delegations from the other southern princely states of Mysore, Travancore and Cochin were prepared to follow Hyderabad’s lead. In July 1935, the negotiations broke down, with the delegations from the four princely states returning home. Angered by the violent rhetoric which followed from some of the more extreme members of the BNC, most of the delegation of the Madras Presidency followed them.
The crisis dragged on for months, with what appeared to be genuine potential for war. As still the notional rulers of India, the three founding states sent diplomats to India to try to act as mediators. Their efforts were treated with suspicion by some elements within the BNC, out of well-reasoned fear that the southern states would seek to join the Empire, or at least seek alliance.
Fortunately for both sides, the moderates within the Congress prevailed, thanks also to some more effective mediation by a delegation from the Emperor of Nippon. Hyderabad, Mysore, Travancore, Cochin and the newly-formed Commonwealth of Madras became independent states in July 1936, at the same time as the Republic of Bharat. Within its now-restricted borders, the Congress set about building their new Bharat, while the southern states followed a separate path which in time would bring them into close friendship with the Empire...
In 1939, the first round of long-promised plebiscites were held. East Africa, Burma, Malaya, Sarawak, the Philippines, Maguindanao & Sulu, Central Africa, British Somaliland, the Maldives, Aden, the islands in the Indian and Pacific Oceans and the Arabian protectorates voted on their futures.
As expected, the Philippines opted to become a kingdom within the Empire. Prince Robert, cousin of George I of Australia, converted to Catholicism, renounced claims on the Australian succession, and became King Roberto I of the Philippines.
The plebiscite in East Africa resulted in narrow approval for the carefully-crafted negotiations which had been conducted over the previous five years. The second son of King Jonathan I of South Africa was chosen as King Andrew I, of a nation which was renamed as Kenya. As part of the same vote, the Kenyans approved a constitution which restricted several key government offices to people from particular races, including a black prime minister.
The people of the Maldives voted to join a personal union with Ceylon. In practice, this meant that a popularly-elected local assembly at Male managed most domestic affairs, with Colombo directing its defence policy.
In the rest of the Indian Ocean, the Comoros, Seychelles and Mascarenes [Réunion & Mauritius] opted to become autonomous dependences of South Africa, with more restricted sovereignty than the Maldives had from Ceylon. In the Pacific, Fiji, Samoa [including Tokelau], Tonga, the Cook Islands and the Society Islands voted to become similarly autonomous dependencies. The Ellice Islands [Tuvalu], Pleasant Island [Nauru], the Tuamotos and Pitcairn Island opted for more limited self-rule, while remaining dependencies of Australia.
Pre-plebiscite negotiations in Burma had been heated, and sometimes violent, with the divided ethnicities mistrusting each other. The plebiscite had offered the option of full independence as a republic, or the creation of a people’s kingdom [20] within the Empire. Most outside expectations had been for the Burmese to choose a republic and independence, yet more than two-thirds of the vote was for a people’s kingdom within the Empire.
Public explanations of this vote usually ascribed it to a Burmese belief that a neutral monarch as a head of state (much like Ceylon and Palestine) would be more beneficial than having several ethnicities competing against each other. Most private explanations, and a few less tactful public explanations, added that the security of Imperial membership would be welcome for a nation next to increasingly hyper-nationalistic Bharat. Whatever the reasons, Frederick, third son of King Edward I of Ceylon, agreed to become the monarch of Burma after renouncing his and his heirs’ places in the Ceylonese succession.
The plebiscites which attracted most international interest at the time where those in British Somaliland and Aden. These two regions were important for controlling access to and from the Red Sea; without control of them, it was remarked, Germany would gain nothing from having taken the Suez Canal during the Great War.
Because of that German interest, and to a lesser degree the growing alignment between Abyssinia and Russia, both British Somaliland and Aden voted to remain within the Empire. The rapid expansion of monarchies at this time had produced a surfeit of nations seeking suitable rulers and a concomitant shortage of available monarchs. After further negotiations, Matthew Windsor [21], cousin of George I of Australia, become the ruler of both the newly-formed People’s Kingdom of Somalia, and the People’s Kingdom of Aden. The two states were established as sovereign entities in all respects; Matthew I divided his time between the respective capitals of Berbera and Aden, but the two nations had no other political connections.
Most other 1939 plebiscites saw votes for independence, but not Kingdom status or its equivalent. These nations opted to become states “in association” with the Empire, which involved preferential but not full trade access, and admission to the military coordination arrangements of the empire, although not yet the full alliance offered to member states. They drew this inspiration from Siam, which in 1938 had opted for a similar form of association with the Empire, while retaining its own sovereignty.
Malaya voted to become a federated monarchy, incorporating the nine royal states of Perak, Selangor, Pahang, Negeri Sembilan, Perlis, Kedah, Kelantan, Terengganu, and Johor, together with the free ports of Penang and Singapore, and the non-royal state of Malacca. Malaya was jointly governed by the Nine Sultans in Council, although their roles were largely ceremonial, with governance conducted by an elected legislature.
Oman likewise voted to become a federal monarchy, with the Sultan of Oman as overall suzerain. Maguindanao & Sulu became a monarchy under the Sultan of Sulu, with both regions having notional autonomy, although common institutions would be developed in time, and in international parlance the nation is called Sulu.
Sarawak, so long a preserve of the Borneo Company and exemplar of the corporate state [22], had been transformed before the Great War by the bankruptcy of the Company and subsequent direct colonial rule. After the war, it had been courted both by Malaya and Sulu for various forms of political association, but eventually opted for full independence.
Central Africa represented the most ambiguous of all of the regions of the Empire. As a region, it had been hurriedly created during the dying days of the Great War out of portions of former British colonies which had survived the transfer of other parts of those colonies to Portugal or been defended from German invasion. It had limited political cohesion and few common institutions, save a general reluctance on the part of most of its inhabitants to succumb to German rule. It existed, in effect, to fill a space on the map of Africa which the Empire did not want to yield to German influence [23].
With such inchoate status, Central Africa represented the one region where the local delegations asked for the plebiscite to include the option for continued imperial administration. When the votes were tallied in 1939, the plurality of voters had chosen to remain under Imperial rule for another five years, when a second plebiscite would follow...
In 1942, the second round of plebiscites was conducted in the formerly German colonies of Indochina, Madagascar, the East Indies, Timor and Mozambique.
Indochina opted to become a federal republic in association with the Empire. At the national level it was governed by a popularly elected president, with the seat of federal government in Hanoi. Three royal states in Annam, Laos and Cambodia, and two non-royal states of Tonkin and Cochinchina, were governed by local assemblies.
Madagascar’s own royal family had been deposed decades before, and were not remembered fondly. Distant from any potential German or Russian threat, Madagascar also did not have any significant fears for its own security. So its voters took the option of becoming an independent republic outside of the Empire, with friendly relations but no formal association.
The East Indies posed a complex problem. Strictly speaking they had always been a Dutch rather than a German colony. Some parts of the East Indies had been under colonial rule for centuries, but most parts had only come under formal colonial control during the nineteenth or early twentieth centuries. These disparate regions often had little to unite them, other than a common mistrust of their old colonial legacy. Vociferous negotiations during the transitional period had been conducted to resolve the question of whether the planned plebiscite should simply offer independence to the whole of the East Indies, or whether some regions should be offered the choice of separating entirely from the proposed new nation.
Ultimately, the bulk of the East Indies voted for independence as the new Republic of Indonesia, with its capital at newly-renamed Jakarta. Distant from potential rivals, Indonesia declined to join the Empire even as an associated state, although it quickly developed close economic ties. However, the regions of Aceh, Minahasa [North Sulawesi] and the Moluccas [24] voted to remain separate from Indonesia, becoming new states in association with the Empire.
Timor, long a Portuguese dominion, had been forcibly sold to Germany in 1920, and its people felt neglected. It had been purchased by Germany simply as an appendage of the more lucrative regions of the East Indies, and been largely ignored since apart from a few coffee plantations. Resistance to Australian invasion during the war was negligible. During the post-war transitional period, Timor benefitted from unrestricted trade access to the Australian market, which made its coffee exports much more valuable. In the plebiscite, the majority of Timorese voted to become a territory of Australia.
Mozambique was a region even more divided than Indonesia, and with the same history of Portuguese domination then forcible sale to Germany. Voting in the plebiscite was split along largely regional lines. The north of the country opted to join Kenya, the centre and south voted for union with South Africa, while lingering pro-Portuguese sentiment saw western Mozambique vote for union with Portuguese Angola [25]...
--
[1] The date of the end of the Great War varies among sources. Some set it in 1932, when the fighting stopped in Europe. Most set it in 1933, when the fighting stopped (except for the US) and the Dublin Conference marked the main peace that ended the war. Some set in 1935, when the war between the US and Chile officially ended.
[2] Internal border controls and associated migration controls are in many cases the most important concerns of individual regions. Smaller regions often fear Russification from large numbers of Russian-speaking immigrants (particularly wealthy Russians moving in and taking economic control). Many regions, including Russia proper, fear a flood of Chinese migration westward, and so restrict that.
[3] The name Russia gave Ulan Bator prior to the OTL Russian Revolution.
[4] Kokand was not formally annexed ITTL, instead being left in a vassal status similar to that of Bokhara and Khiva.
[5] Ice Jecen roughly corresponds to the OTL Chinese province of Xinjiang, and which has also been historically known as East Turkestan.
[6] TTL’s Manchuria includes both Outer Manchuria and most of Inner Manchuria, since Russia obtained control of most of Inner Manchuria as one of the concessions it demanded from the Qing during the Great War.
[7] Or, as *Americans call it, ongoing terrorism.
[8] Or, more precisely, a surplus of labour for the sorts of industries and occupations which would provide a rate of return which would be acceptable to the owners. There is still productive work which could be performed by indentured labour, but in industries where the rate of return would be much lower than would be preferred given the slave and peon prices.
[9] The Antilles essentially comprises all of the OTL islands of the Lesser Antilles which stretch in an arc between the US/British Virgin Islands and Aruba and Curacao. These were islands which had been gradually acquired by the *USA but which were not considered to have a high enough population to justify statehood. The *US state of the Antilles does not include the Bahamas or the Turks and Caicos, which are administered separately.
[10] Trujillo is composed of the OTL Peruvian provinces of Amazonas, Ancash, Cajamarca, La Libertad, Lambayeque, Loreto, Piura and San Martín. Lima is Ayacucho, Huancavelica, Huánuco, Ica, Junín, Lima, Pasco, and Ucayali. Arequipa is Apurímac, Arequipa, Callao Province, Cuzco, Madre de Dios, Moquegua, Puno, Tacna, and Tumbes.
[11] Rio de Janeiro is composed of the *American segments of the OTL Brazilian provinces of Bahia, Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro, while Sao Paulo is composed of Paraná, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina and São Paulo.
[12] Santiago is composed of the OTL Chilean provinces of Antofagasta, Atacama, Coquimbo, Tarapacá, Metropolitana de Santiago and Valparaíso, while Concepcion is composed of Biobío, Ibáñez del Campo, La Araucanía, Los Lagos, Magellan and Antarctic Region, Maule and O’Higgins, as well as the Argentinean province of Tierra del Fuego e Islas del Atlántico Sur, and the Falkland Islands.
[13] Not to mention the lower value of the *US dollar, which collapsed along with cotton and slave prices. This makes *US manufacturing exports much more cost-competitive.
[14] This views the Treaty of Paris (1783) as the formation of the United States of America as an independent state, rather than the Declaration of Independence in 1776.
[15] This is a legacy of the Treaty of Madrid (1932), which ended the war between Germany and Aragon, Portugal and the USA. As part of that treaty, Germany acquired the right to take the Aragonese Congo. After the war, though, the hostility of the Restored Empire meant that this option was not exercised for over a decade.
[16] The Three Duchies are Uri (actually a principality), Wallis and Tessin.
[17] There are a few areas where German states still had some claims. For instance, the Habsburgs coveted Lorraine and the Franche-Comté, while the House of Orange-Nassau looked desirously at the remainder of Picardy and their traditional home in the French town of Orange.
[18] Karl-Heinz Blucher, head of a mostly left-wing coalition and Chancellor of Germany from 1936 to 1941.
[19] Provence is the Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur region. Lyonnais is the Rhône-Alpes region east of the Rhône River (the border just barely goes around the city of Lyon). Lower Burgundy is the Franche-Comté and Bourgogne regions east of the Saône River. Lorraine is the Lorraine region minus the Mossele department, which is part of Alsace-Lorraine. Champagne is the Champagne-Ardenne region north of the Seine, as well as the remaining part of the Bourgogne region that is within Germany. Picardy is the historical County of Picardy that is not within the Netherlands ITTL. Soissons is the rest of the Picardy region plus the Île-de-France region north of the Seine, except for Paris itself. Upper Normandy is more or less the former Duchy of Normandy north of the Seine.
[20] People’s kingdom is an ATL institution which was originally created in Ceylon, and which has now been adopted elsewhere. Ceylon is a de jure elective monarchy, with each successor being confirmed by a majority of a popular vote, and can be required to be reconfirmed should 10% of the people call for it. To date, this provision has been notional rather than meaningful, no would-be Ceylonese monarch has failed to win election, and a recall election has never been called.
[21] The royal families in the British Empire are still technically descended from the House of Hanover (itself a branch of the House of Welf). This is because instead of Victoria, *Edward VII was born and preserved descent in the male line. The family name was changed to Windsor during the Great War to distance themselves from Germany.
[22] In OTL, Sarawak was created as a private fiefdom of the “White Rajahs” of the Brooke dynasty, while neighbouring Sabah was dominated by the North Borneo Company. ATL, Sabah was administratively incorporated with the OTL southern Phillipines, while the region of Sarawak was exploited by the Borneo Company as a source of tropical timber, and rubber plantations.
[23] -1 points for anyone who doesn’t get that reference.
[24] Although called the Moluccas, this state consists of what in OTL is called the South Moluccas; Ambon, Ceram, Buru and nearby islands. The OTL North Moluccas are part of Indonesia.
[25] The geographical divisions are the lands east of Lake Nyassa [Lake Malawi] and north of the River Lurio joined Kenya, the lands roughly south of the Lurio and east of the River Lupalua joined South Africa, while the remaining lands west of the Lupalua joined Angola.
* * *
Thoughts?