Chapter 48
David Cameron addresses the nation after the Conservatives emerged as the largest party at the 2016 Election
As the results of the 2016 General Election poured in in the early hours of May 6th, it was soon clear that the Conservatives had, as expected, lost their majority. But of all the major parties, it was they who had the most reason to be content with the outcome that was emerging. Whilst there had been a swing to Labour, their gains were not on the scale required to turf the Tories out of office, in part thanks to the boundary changes that the government had introduced three years previously. Whilst the election had produced a hung parliament, the chances of a pro-Labour majority were extremely thin. Even a fragile agreement involving Labour, the Lib Dems, the Alternative, and the three nationalist parties that took their seats in the House of Commons would have been short of an effective majority by one MP.
The Conservatives, by contrast, were in a relatively comfortable position. Even if they failed to come to an agreement with the Liberal Democrats (which some thought to be a distinct possibility), it was speculated that they would still pass a Queen’s Speech with the support of the ten unionist MPs from Northern Ireland, plus the four UKIP MPs that had been returned in Kent and Essex, before calling a second election later in the year, where David Cameron’s party would secure an overall majority, just as Harold Wilson had done for Labour in 1974.
It was this possibility, rather than any belief that he was about to enter Downing Street, that led David Miliband to announce that he would remain in post as Labour leader until at least the end of the party conference season. If Britain had to go to the polls again in the near future, so the thinking went, then Labour could not afford to be caught up in a divisive leadership campaign, which ran the risk of alienating voters and handing Cameron the majority that he had just been deprived of. However, there was another school of thought, advanced by the more left wing factions within the Labour church (many of whom grumbled that the party had chosen the wrong brother five years previously) that suggested that Miliband had been badly discredited by the experience of the campaign, and that he could not hope to take Labour back to government in the event of a new election, and therefore a new figurehead was needed at the top. For the time being, the first argument won out, and Miliband remained as Leader of the Opposition.
On the government benches, the Prime Minister emerged from the campaign as a strengthened figure within his party. Cameron had been the undoubted beneficiary of low expectations. Even a month beforehand, when some were calling for his resignation over the scandal regarding his tax affairs, few had expected him to secure such a strong result.. Although the Tories had just secured their lowest share of the vote since they were led by the Duke of Wellington, there was little question over replacing Cameron, at least for now.
Although the Liberal Democrats had lost votes for the third election running, the decline in the Conservative vote share had been enough to see the party gain an additional three MPs. This fact, coupled with a desire for stability in a party that had seen an extremely quick turnover of leaders in recent years, ensured that David Laws remained at the head of his party, as the Lib Dems turned their attention to the process of government formation.
Other leaders, like Sheppard, Farage, and Salmond, had now been elevated to cult figure status among certain sections of the population. In many ways, the gains that Alternative and UKIP made were the story of the election. All three of the ‘traditional’ parties had lost votes, and the Conservatives and Labour had failed to muster even 60% of the vote between them. This breakdown of the two-party system was a far cry from the days when the Tories and Labour could together expect to pull in close to 90% of the vote. But despite this, relatively few seats were lost to the insurgents. Whilst UKIP was able to secure victories in constituencies such as Thurrock and Thanet East, it had also lost some of the seats it had acquired in the final years of the last parliament, such as Heywood and Middleton, and Stourbridge.
The Alternative had made gains over its performance five years previously. Included among their new intake who were already well established as major figures within the alliance- including Caroline Lucas (who won Oxford East at the second time of asking) and Owen Jones (who took Camden Town and Regent’s Park)- as well as some who would become more prominent in the next parliament, such as Clive Lewis (Deptford and Rotherhithe) and Molly Scott Cato (Bristol West).
Respect’s Clive Lewis successfully took Deptford and Rotherhithe off of Labour at the 2016 General Election
However, the surge in support for the Alternative during the campaign had served to raise hopes that the alliance would see more dramatic gains than what they ultimately managed to achieve. When the Alternative reached its polling peak in the middle of April, it was speculated that it could win upwards of 30, or even 40 seats in the new parliament. Set against these lofty expectations, the final total of 18 Seats (13 of which were from Respect, 5 from the Greens) was always going to be considered a somewhat underwhelming return. The alliance had once again fallen foul of first past the post. Whilst they had been able to secure an impressive 15% of the popular vote, like any third party, they had struggled to concentrate this support in specific constituencies. It was perhaps unsurprising, therefore, that the need for electoral reform was frequently mentioned by figures within the Alternative and UKIP on election night and the days that followed it.
Although it would soon become clear that there was little short-term prospect of change in the voting system, there was nevertheless plenty of cause for optimism within the parties that comprised the Alternative. The alliance had made big gains since 2011, and had beat the Liberal Democrats to third place in the popular vote. What was more, the bloc had seen large scale gains in urban constituencies and in the south of England, as it expanded its appeal from outside its traditional base of ethnic minorities to the young and public-sector workers. The fact that it had secured 102 second place finishes across the country showed the potential that the alliance had to become a major third force in parliament. And now, in Tommy Sheppard, it had a popular figurehead with which to advance its agenda.
All of this meant that there was a definite sense of momentum and purpose in Alternative circles in the immediate aftermath of the 2016 General Election, which was very much in contrast to the lack of direction that characterised the Labour Party in these months. As commentators began to process the implications of the election result, some posited that Labour, like the Liberal Party a century before it, had entered a state of inexorable decline. Unable to reconcile the competing demands of its former electoral coalition, it was suggested that it would be displaced by in the coming years by the Alternative within socially liberal urban areas, UKIP in its conservative, post-industrial heartlands, and the Scottish National Party north of the border, allowing the Tories to emerge as the hegemonic force virtually everywhere else. This talk was considered to be a tad fanciful by many, but it reflected a growing sense that the traditional centre-left threaten to find itself engulfed by the rising tide of populism, just as it had been throughout Europe. This was a feeling that was only to become more acute in the months ahead.