The M-BAM Main Thread

[Valdore Javorsky]

Pretty thick outline don't you think?

As thick as the amount of drugs New Zealandball did!

 

[Valdore Javorsky]

Here's the actual one. Took me 34 min.

 

[Narwhal]

Here's the actual one. Took me 34 min.

Isn't Lake Taupo large enough to show up on this scale?

 

[Tomoto17]

Macquarie Island

 

[Valdore Javorsky]

Isn't Lake Taupo large enough to show up on this scale?

No according to reference map

Anyways might change that

 

[Valdore Javorsky]

Anyone got a claim on Antarctica?

 

[Valdore Javorsky]

My results for today. Though it's 2:25pm here in Krautland, I won't be able to continue anymore for today (most likely), because I'm going to a small party-dinner thingie and it's most likely i won't be coming back before FkingLateEvening so I think this is my result for today. Should the case occur that I got some time left before I get insane through staying up that late, I'll probably show this together with my tomorrow results.

 

[Blind]

Anyone got a claim on Antarctica?

I doubt it.

 

[Tanystropheus42]

Sorry to be a pessimist, but you may have to redraw that ice sheet soon:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-38686626

A good portion of it will break away soon, and this may lead to larger scale ice sheet collapses in the near future.

 

[Pragmatic Progressive]

Sorry to be a pessimist, but you may have to redraw that ice sheet soon:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-38686626

A good portion of it will break away soon, and this may lead to larger scale ice sheet collapses in the near future.

Well... climate change induces map change. Oh shoot! Let's all emit less CO2!

 

[HarrisonBergeron]

Well... climate change induces map change. Oh shoot! Let's all emit less CO2!

Seems it’s not really CO2 doing anything to the climate.

 

[Cool-Eh]

Seems it’s not really CO2 doing anything to the climate.
View attachment 304897

Completely untrue. That's not at all how greenhouse gases work.

 

[Ashtagon]

Seems it’s not really CO2 doing anything to the climate.
View attachment 304897

I suspect you might be taking that chart out of context. Here's another, which clearly demonstrates a strong correlation between CO2 content and temperature, going back 450,000 years.

Temperature change (blue) and carbon dioxide change (red) observed in ice core records Many other records are available

Source: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globalwarming/temperature-change.html

 

[HarrisonBergeron]

Completely untrue. That's not at all how greenhouse gases work.

Then it isn’t a greenhouse gas, because this is how CO2 has been known to work for at least 40 years, reaffirmed every (rare!) time the funding to run the tests again are approved.

…clearly demonstrates a strong correlation between CO2 content and temperature.

Yes, CO2 increases lag temperature increases. This has long been known. My apologies for bringing this into the thread. I’d be happy to continue the discussion in PM, but it’s not appropriate here anymore.

 

[Alex Richards]

Then it isn’t a greenhouse gas, because this is how CO2 has been known to work for at least 40 years, reaffirmed every (rare!) time the funding to run the tests again are approved.


Yes, CO2 increases lag temperature increases. This has long been known. My apologies for bringing this into the thread. I’d be happy to continue the discussion in PM, but it’s not appropriate here anymore.

Mate, you've just cited a paper which the author himself described as featuring 'some stupid mistakes... it was just embarrassing'.

Suffice to say that his methodology is seriously flawed.

And I'm posting this publically not in PM because sometimes you do need to ensure that the other side of the argument is provided in the same place for the benefit of anyone coming across it.

 

[Valdore Javorsky]

*cough* *cough*

 

[Witch0Winter]

Oh dear God please keep this thread just for mapping.

 

[Blind]

Oh dear God please keep this thread just for mapping.

 

[CalBear]

Then it isn’t a greenhouse gas, because this is how CO2 has been known to work for at least 40 years, reaffirmed every (rare!) time the funding to run the tests again are approved.


Yes, CO2 increases lag temperature increases. This has long been known. My apologies for bringing this into the thread. I’d be happy to continue the discussion in PM, but it’s not appropriate here anymore.

Your last sentece saved you from a kick.

NEVER bring current politics, much less alternate science/conspiracy mongering into a non Chat thread again.

 

[CalBear]

Mate, you've just cited a paper which the author himself described as featuring 'some stupid mistakes... it was just embarrassing'.

Suffice to say that his methodology is seriously flawed.

And I'm posting this publically not in PM because sometimes you do need to ensure that the other side of the argument is provided in the same place for the benefit of anyone coming across it.

STOP!

NOW!