Deleted member 67076
I second this.Why do all the beautiful map makers support mega-Germanies. Can't we have more beautiful mega-Italies, or Russias, or etc.?
Not that I want less of these crazy beautiful maps.
I second this.Why do all the beautiful map makers support mega-Germanies. Can't we have more beautiful mega-Italies, or Russias, or etc.?
Not that I want less of these crazy beautiful maps.
It's a shame that you waste your talent on mapping something so absolutely disgusting. But it's the most technically sophisticated and (on a certain level) aesthetically appealing map I've seen in a long time.
Anyhoo, decided to do a version of "Bring the Jubilee" that's more true to the book - I'm trying to avoid contradicting the story straight out. I have the map, but the writeup will be a bit longer - need to recharge my snark batteries to do proper justice to it.
It's likely a Nazi victory world. (See Adolfsburg)How is it disgusting?
It's likely a Nazi victory world. (See Adolfsburg)
It's likely a Nazi victory world. (See Adolfsburg)
It is nice to see you are making new maps again. What sources or ideas did you use for the peculiar inland sea of the Dutch? And naming a province after Wagner... Truly original.
I think it's one of the 'nicer' maps for a German victory. There are still Slavic survivors hear and the Scandinavians have not lost their identities and been used as breeding cattle.It's a shame that you waste your talent on mapping something so absolutely disgusting. But it's the most technically sophisticated and (on a certain level) aesthetically appealing map I've seen in a long time.
snip
I don't think he's wasting his talent just because the scenario is an undesirable one.It's a shame that you waste your talent on mapping something so absolutely disgusting. But it's the most technically sophisticated and (on a certain level) aesthetically appealing map I've seen in a long time.
I've actually thought about this when trying to develop worlds in a science fiction setting. Would a very slowly rotating Earth-sized world (say, one Earth year/day) have lower gravity/apparently lower gravity (from the subject's frame of reference) due to the much lesser Centripetal Force? .
Er, no. Centripetal force sends you outwards, not in towards the core.
Two complains:
1. Why is Italy still divided? The italian unification happend before Gettysburg.
2. Are you sure the German Union has a Kaiser? If I remember it right the timetraveler seems rather surprised that the Germans get a Kaiser in 1871 and wonders if this will prevent the Emporer-war . And why call a State with a Kaiser Union and not Reich? The closest thing to a German Union was this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erfurt_Union, which explicid wanted to avoid the title Kaiser.
You're thinking of centrifugal force, which doesn't quite work that way either. In fact, it's pulling you straight forward, but because you're attached to something that rotates it translates to movement outwards.
Right, right, he managed to get me confused. But centrifugal force doesn't "pull" you either: from the point of view of an outside observer, it's inertia. Of course, from _within_ the rotating frame, it acts as a force: around 3% of gravity at the equator, I think.
Bruce
(If Blomma starts making individual street plans for new Nazi cities, he will start to creep me out).
Beedok: my maps aren't really beautiful, but I'll give you a mega-Italy if you give me a scenario.
While we're sorta kinda on the subject of ERB, I'm curious which of his works you plan on incorporating?Right, right, he managed to get me confused. But centrifugal force doesn't "pull" you either: from the point of view of an outside observer, it's inertia. Of course, from _within_ the rotating frame, it acts as a force: around 3% of gravity at the equator, I think.
Bruce
I confused you physics-wise? How so?
Also, again, Centripetal Force is always a force; I didn't ask about Centrifugal.
.