Glen
The map reminded me of a number of things in the TL but a couple of questions:
a) Is that an Austria super-Morocco? That looks rather odd and how did it survive the war?
b) Afghanistan was mentioned but wasn't it a mega-Sikh state or am I remembering another TL?
Like the idea of progress with dominion status for India that much earlier. Although the status of the princely states will be interesting, plus does it include Burma and Ceylon? Australia is presumably slower in development because with the DSA and Patagonia and a larger S Africa its probably got less settlers, even despite the gold rush.
On the welfare state OTL the 1st steps really started ~1910 with the introduction of a state pension, although think it was only if enough contributions had been made at the time. There was pressure for further social reform after WWI, with all the plans for 'a land fit for heroes' but between the reaction against the horrors of the war 'getting back to normal', the decline of the Liberals and the economic situation most of that came to nothing. Possibly this time, since the war wasn't as destructive overall I think there is more will to improve the general interest in social welfare and the quality of the population. [After all this is the height of social Darwinism]. However the economy is generally strong I think so it might stay more libertarian and as you said there would be a reaction against Korsgaardian ideas.
- Utter rubbish, there are still areas not pink!
Steve
The map reminded me of a number of things in the TL but a couple of questions:
a) Is that an Austria super-Morocco? That looks rather odd and how did it survive the war?
b) Afghanistan was mentioned but wasn't it a mega-Sikh state or am I remembering another TL?
Like the idea of progress with dominion status for India that much earlier. Although the status of the princely states will be interesting, plus does it include Burma and Ceylon? Australia is presumably slower in development because with the DSA and Patagonia and a larger S Africa its probably got less settlers, even despite the gold rush.
On the welfare state OTL the 1st steps really started ~1910 with the introduction of a state pension, although think it was only if enough contributions had been made at the time. There was pressure for further social reform after WWI, with all the plans for 'a land fit for heroes' but between the reaction against the horrors of the war 'getting back to normal', the decline of the Liberals and the economic situation most of that came to nothing. Possibly this time, since the war wasn't as destructive overall I think there is more will to improve the general interest in social welfare and the quality of the population. [After all this is the height of social Darwinism]. However the economy is generally strong I think so it might stay more libertarian and as you said there would be a reaction against Korsgaardian ideas.
Indeed it is not - then again, it is very hard to out-do the Britwank that is OTL.
- Utter rubbish, there are still areas not pink!
Steve