Has it not already be proved above that all storm-troops can multi-task rather well? I would assume the invasion transports laid the mines on route?what the hell are the Germans using to lay these minefields? They only have two dedicated minelayers (started the war with three, but one's sunk already), anything else is going to be some kind of conversion, and
Not strictly true, there were two minelayers and six mine ships capable between them of carrying something in the region of 3000 mines. All destroyers were equiped to carry 60 odd mines and the torpedo boats 30 odd mines each. The minesweepers had room for 30 mines apiece and subs had mine carrying capacity as well.Actually, hang on, what the hell are the Germans using to lay these minefields? They only have two dedicated minelayers (started the war with three, but one's sunk already), anything else is going to be some kind of conversion, and thus horribly vulnerable to British ships and aircraft.
Indeed. If you see that as evidence that Sealion could be succesful, then Dynamo proves that the UK could have invaded France in september 1940.
Huh. Well, good on the Germans for spreading out their minelaying capacity.Not strictly true, there were two minelayers and six mine ships capable between them of carrying something in the region of 3000 mines. All destroyers were equiped to carry 60 odd mines and the torpedo boats 30 odd mines each. The minesweepers had room for 30 mines apiece and subs had mine carrying capacity as well.
is this where i point out the RN had the capability to clear minefields faster than the ubermarine could lay them....and if the ubermarine vessels were all carrying and laying mines who is guarding the supply convoys?
I don't disagree with you at all, by my count the RN had roughly 50 dedicated minesweepers and a whole heap of minesweeping trawlers. My reply was in response to the claim that the KM had only two minelayers with a capacity of 800-900 mines when in fact throughout the fleet the capacity was probably in excess 5000 mines.is this where i point out the RN had the capability to clear minefields faster than the ubermarine could lay them....and if the ubermarine vessels were all carrying and laying mines who is guarding the supply convoys?
Something the British will also be doing, except their fields are layer parallel to the beaches.I don't disagree with you at all, by my count the RN had roughly 50 dedicated minesweepers and a whole heap of minesweeping trawlers. My reply was in response to the claim that the KM had only two minelayers with a capacity of 800-900 mines when in fact throughout the fleet the capacity was probably in excess 5000 mines.
As to laying the mines it seems more than reasonable to assume that they would be layed prior to the actual crossing so the ships would be available for other duties.
that the British know exactly where you are going to arrive?more than reasonable to assume that they would be layed prior to the actual crossing so
you are assuming of course that they don t meet with a mishap while laying the mines and of course there is the time between laying them and the invasion force leaving in which the RN minesweepers can deal with the mines......noting that they only need to clear a path not the entire field.I don't disagree with you at all, by my count the RN had roughly 50 dedicated minesweepers and a whole heap of minesweeping trawlers. My reply was in response to the claim that the KM had only two minelayers with a capacity of 800-900 mines when in fact throughout the fleet the capacity was probably in excess 5000 mines.
As to laying the mines it seems more than reasonable to assume that they would be layed prior to the actual crossing so the ships would be available for other duties.
Well after Gallipoli the Ottoman state did collapse...So basically Glenn is now proposing a German Gallipoli on the South Coast of Britain? Just when you think he's plumbed the depths of absurdity he finds a way to dive deeper.
The Admiralty aren’t going to be committing any KGVs to the Channel in September 1940, because there aren’t any in service yet.In the Atlantic, the British are watching the Twins and Bismarck run rampant because the Admiralty thought it would be a good idea to commit the KGV's and BC's to the Channel.
There also aren't any Twins or Bismarck during the Sea Lion window either.The Admiralty aren’t going to be committing any KGVs to the Channel in September 1940, because there aren’t any in service yet.
Facts, eh. Facts.
I like the idea of all the KM escort ships bringing a full load of mines along to a gunfight. Get all those barges tucked in nice and close..
In the case where Sealion is contained in a bridgehead there are 9 divisions that can eek by at 100 tons per day each. In the case where Sealion breaks through the British defensive crust into mobile warfare, that would require more than 2,000 tons per day. Are you admitting that scenario could happen, or is this one of those cases where a poster is talking out of both sides of their mouths at the same time? That is to say, you want to use a supply requirement needed for mechanized warfare after a breakout, but you do not want to admit the Germans can break out of the beachhead with landed mechanized units?
At Guadalcanal the USN set up 5" coastal batteries to cover their landing area, and I assume, also laid minefields. For Sealion we can assume the same thing, that coastal batteries landed on the English side as a high priority, and that defensive minefields would be established at the landing zones even while the landings are occurring.
8"? Maybe. 6"? No.
Oh, I'm sure on this thread if an old "R" class battleship gets into a tussel with a half a dozen heavy coastal guns on Pas de Calais backed by 60 or 80 bomber attacks, that it'll be all the 'R's" way.