So the US's obesity rate would be where the rest of the anglosphere is. Better than OTL.- Non-aldulturous Clinton
- No car culture
- No Dulles brothers
HHH winning in 1968 would mean no Earl Butz, which would mean no corn subsidies.
-
HHH winning in 1968 would mean no Earl Butz, which would mean no corn subsidies.
Going by Butz's sense of humor, all you need is him being "witty" in an interview to get his job and thus angering Nixon enough to not do it.- Non-aldulturous Clinton
- No car culture
- No Dulles brothers
HHH winning in 1968 would mean no Earl Butz, which would mean no corn subsidies.
While that certainly would be an interesting read, McCarthy wasn't seriously considered by LBJ for VP. Johnson entertained the idea mostly because he liked McCarthy at the time, but it was pretty clear that Humphrey would be the pick from start to finish. But assuming that McCarthy is picked for VP through some sort of especially ego-stroking display of public loyalty, he most definitely would've been a pro-war figure throughout the Johnson Administration. Another question is the fact that Humphrey was a good team player, and I don't know if he would be willing to run against Johnson in 1968.President Johnson picks macathy in 64.,Humphrey runs in 68 as a anti war candidate.
I'm confused as to what you're trying to say. Are you talking about Butz charming Nixon or Butz angering Nixon?Going by Butz's sense of humor, all you need is him being "witty" in an interview to get his job and thus angering Nixon enough to not do it.
Butz saying some joke, perhaps the OTL one that got him fired to Nixon and Nixon being like "Yeah, can't hire you even if it's hilarious".- FDR doesn't run for a third term. Would Henry Wallace run?
I'm confused as to what you're trying to say. Are you talking about Butz charming Nixon or Butz angering Nixon?
On the one hand, even accounting for military interference, the pre-Taisho 20th century PMs all enjoyed the support of the House, they just were not de jure responsible to it. What turned Japan militarist was the crisis of the Great Depression, which compounded on an already shaky economy during the early Showa era.The Taisho democracy holding on is an interesting idea but it feels a bit contrived after that. Too many steps for it to really be an idea rather than a scenario.
While I like the idea, Wodehouse is already in his mid-fifties by 1940 and is increasingly living abroad because he isn't that happy with the direction of post-war (WW1) Britain. Because Wodehouse went on writing prolifically right up to his death at the age of ninety in 1975 we forget that he was already in late middle age in 1940 with 35 years as a writer under his belt. I think you would have to settle for avoiding him becoming persona non grata. I can't see a major stylistic shift. He read widely and didn't ignore social realism but as he said "There are two ways of writing a novel. One is mine, to write a kind of musical comedy without music. The other is to go deeply into life without giving a damn"P.G. Wodehouse manages to avoid being co-opted by his Nazi captors in 1940-41.
A - He avoids being a persona non grata in his homeland
B - His writing takes a different twist after the war (any number of ways for this to play out)
While I like the idea, Wodehouse is already in his mid-fifties by 1940 and is increasingly living abroad because he isn't that happy with the direction of post-war (WW1) Britain. Because Wodehouse went on writing prolifically right up to his death at the age of ninety in 1975 we forget that he was already in late middle age in 1940 with 35 years as a writer under his belt. I think you would have to settle for avoiding him becoming persona non grata. I can't see a major stylistic shift. He read widely and didn't ignore social realism but as he said "There are two ways of writing a novel. One is mine, to write a kind of musical comedy without music. The other is to go deeply into life without giving a damn"