Charcolt: That would be the smart thing, although throughout history, including Byzantine history, promoting someone as heir, then replacing them with someone else (say a legitimate son by Maria), often tends to really annoy the now ex-heir, who has a substantial legitimacy boost from their former heir status.
Aegon IV?
The Safavid claim to the throne is entirely dependent on their marriage ties with the Drakoi-Bagrationi. Only once Anna and Vakhtang’s son David takes the throne with the Safavid takeover be really complete.
RogueTraderEnthusiast: There’s a lot of stuff the Romans can do with Iskandar the Younger, although right now the White Palace is only thinking that he’s a useful tool with which to troll Ibrahim.
Young Kalomeros will appear in the update after next.
MarshalofMontival: Lascaris answered this much better than I could.
HanEmpire: We’ll see.
Boa: First off, I apologize for the butchering of your username. I type up my responses in a word processor to avoid timing-out issues and I don’t have Greek characters on my keyboard. Hope it doesn’t bother you.
I do like the audacity of having the Ottoman dynasty ruling Rhomania, plus with the Safavids in Georgia. Just need to arrange the Mughals of reunited Russia…
Aishio: As for what happened in there, history is going to be silent on that. Some things are just better left mysterious.
Jkarr: Methinks you will like the new Triune monarch…
JohnSmith: The amount paid to the Georgians is what it costs to maintain a line tagma for 16 months, so it’s a big expense but not enough to break the bank. Plus there’s the Imperial Bank to draw on if the state needs a loan and its credit is still very good which keeps interest rates down.
Jahzara will be in the next update.
EarlMarshal: The Eastern Anatolian tagmata especially have a liking for warrior Emperors named Andreas who share the rigors of the ranks (Andreas Niketas, Andreas Drakos before he became Andreas II, Andreas “III” of the War of the Rivers). Also keep in mind that Leo Neokastrites is out in Trebizond; he’s quite old now and a “junior” strategos, but definitely the most popular amongst the ranks.
Lascaris: Thank you for answering MarshalofMontival’s question. I’m grateful for your assistance, especially since I know I have a history of making an ass of myself when it comes to Orthodox theology and church practice.
Arrix85: In fairness to Andreas III compared to Andreas I, Vlad Dracula did arrange to get Kristina of Rus out of Constantinople. If he hadn’t, the conduct of Andreas I then would be like that of Andreas III now. Although that said, Andreas I did sleep with his wife after he returned from Sicily despite having a new mistress, so he still admittedly comes out looking better than his namesake.
Regarding Ethiopian princes, that is a mistake on my part. The eldest son of Tewodros and Veronica is Crown Prince Giyorgis, so he’s the one with a claim to the throne of Rhomania. The only Yohannes in this time period is the father of Jahzara who tried to seize the throne from his older brother.
Southeast Asia is looking shaky with the boost to the Spanish, plus the Triunes getting involved. But all three of the Roman Katepanates in the area have been having pretty solid successes against the locals, albeit nothing spectacular.
Luis3007: Glorious messes are more fun to write and read, I think.
Frustrated Progressive: I understand how you feel, but I will point out that even highly successful states often have very bad periods (France in the 1300s and early 1400s and late 1500s, Russia during the Time of Troubles, Byzantium itself in the 600s and early 700s). Also keep in mind that I do like plot twists.
Roland Traveler: They took back some of the territories ceded at Mashhadshar. Right now the Romans are at a ‘two steps back, one step forward’ stage, but Andreas is laying groundwork to make up for that step as you’ll see in the next update.
Babyrage: I’d put Andreas definitely in the top 10 of history, although I don’t know I’d go so far as say top 5. He doubled, at minimum, the size of the Empire. But he started out with a large and powerful Empire, so it’s not as impressive to me as the likes of Genghis Khan or Timur or even Alexander who started out with little (particularly the first two) and forged gigantic empires. If we go by specifically Roman history though, I think the only people in Andreas’ league are Julius Caesar and 620s Herakleios I.
ImperatorAlexander: I remember saying that, although since then my outline of the war has changed quite a bit. Now I can’t think of an OTL conflict that is a good mirror of the War of the Roman Succession, like the OTL Long Turkish War mirrored the Eternal War. The War of the Austrian Succession is still the closest match I can think of, but the analogy can’t be taken too far.
Apologies if that comes out as somewhat incoherent; I want to avoid spoilers.