Would it have been feasible for somewhat more territory to have been taken from Germany in the immediate aftermath of WWII, along the following lines:
In the event of these additional border changes occurring, what would have been their knock-on effects?
- Bavaria independent (perhaps with minor border adjustments in favour of Czechoslovakia, plus southwestern Lindau panhandle to Baden-Württemburg [see below]), under Allied occupation and committed to permanent neutrality (as with Austria);
- Saxony to Czechoslovakia, perhaps with Görlitz and other areas east of the Spree to Poland instead;
- Saar annexed directly to France, rather than OTL's Protectorate (plus perhaps a border strip in the southern Palatinate, or maybe even the entire Palatinate, all the way up to Worms);
- Rest of Pomerania east of the Ücker to Poland (instead of just Stettin-Swinemünde as OTL), along with rest of Usedom and all of Rügen;
- Thuringia to West Germany and Schleswig-Holstein (including Hamburg) to East Germany, with permanent Soviet naval bases at Kiel and Lübeck and the Kiel Canal itself an international waterway with ships of all nationalities having the right of innocent passage into and out of the Baltic (perhaps with a permanent joint Allied occupation authority to ensure this, a la Berlin);
- Rhineland and Ruhr re-occupied;
- Rhineland west of the Saar (river) to Luxembourg;
- Heligoland back to Britain, plus Trischen, Scharhörn, and Neuwerk;
- East Frisian Islands (Borkum to Wangerooge) to Netherlands (plus perhaps Lower Saxony west of the Ems);
- Sylt and Fehmarn to Denmark;
- Berlin an independent city-state but under permanent joint Allied occupation;
- Baden-Württemburg either French protectorate (as OTL Saar) or independent but French (+American?)-occupied and committed to permanent neutrality (as OTL Austria and TTL Bavaria)?
In the event of these additional border changes occurring, what would have been their knock-on effects?