Paint Your Chariot With Pride! Reboot of Alexander conquers Arabia timeline

The Last Years of Alexander the Great Part 1

"What an excellent horse do they lose, for want of address and boldness to manage him!"

Alexander.jpg


At the start of June in the year 323BCE, the generals and satraps of Alexander’s Empire were confronted with the very real possibility that Alexander the Great was not long for the world. He had fallen into a severe and probably paralytic fever. He was unable to speak, and could barely move without extreme pain. There were fears that he had been poisoned, though others blamed high alcohol consumption. But all of this was laid to rest, as on the 9th of June Alexander’s conditions showed signs of improvement. Whilst movement was still painful for him, his power of speech began to return, and it was clear that he would at least partially recover. By the 15th he was able to walk unaided, and within another week he was able to converse as normal. But the unknown ailment that had afflicted him had left its mark, Alexander could not now perform anything physically taxing without at least some pain and weakness.

This had a profound effect upon his psychology, and left him a noticeably quieter man than before. Later ages would attribute this quote to him in earlier times, “It is only during sex and sleep that I am reminded that I am mortal.” Now he knew for certain that he was mortal. Though some commentators and historians make more of it than is necessary, he had struggled his whole life with the legacy of his father Phillip II. Despite all his conquests, all his victories, and the vast and wealthy empire now under his control, he now felt that he had been pulled down to the same category as his father; afflicted physically. He never shook off the thought that the Gods’ disfavour had been made manifest in his condition.

The most immediate and marked effect this had were the precautions he made with regards to his son, Alexander IV. He realised that the child would be made extremely vulnerable in the event of his early death. He therefore had marked out Perdiccas to be the child’s guardian in the event of his death, whilst assembling the most trusted of his bodyguard to guard his son. It has been rumoured that the Magi of Persia were contacted as potential safeguards as well, though no historical source has ever been found to confirm this. What is certainly true is that the Persian aristocracy placed as much hope in Alexander IV as his own father.

At this stage, Alexander was not finding the territories that he had taken from the Achaemenid Empire hard to police, but he was having extreme difficulty with the Hellenic heartlands. He had never fully trusted most of the Hellenic cities during his Asian campaign, and they had made every effort to thwart Macedonian control. This wave of anti-Macedonian feeling came to a head in the spring of 322BCE, when the Athenian orator Demosthenes led a co-ordinated movement to fire up as many poleis as possible against the Macedonian regime. Alexander’s mother, Olympias, was effectively the satrap of Macedon, and thus she was the one who took control of the situation. She forced the Athenians to arrest the anti-Macedonian ringleaders in Attika, and to arrest on sight anti-Macedonians from other cities. However, rather than be arrested, Demosthenes committed suicide, thus creating both a matyr and a catalyst for the new panhellenic movement that was being born.

This was of great concern to Alexander, who had used the rhetoric of panhellenism to justify and invigorate his campaign in Asia, and thus to legitimise his position among the Hellenic elements of his population. However, beginning in late 322BCE, communicating with Macedon became extremely difficult, and it is clear that Olympias was acting more like a client-queen than a satrap. The dangers of the transition from satrap to client-king was one that would haunt the Argead Empire for its whole span. This would have been less dangerous at the time had Athens not successfully revolted from Macedonian control, along with Achaea. By 320BCE, these would be joined by the majority of the Peloponnesians and the island of Euboea. If the movement spilled over to the islands of the Aegean, it would threaten Argead control over the coast of Anatolia, and from there the revolts might further catalyse.

Alexander made up his mind by Feburary of 321BCE. All of his close circle were against the idea, but the majesty of the King of Kings was enough to prevail. And thus he decided to conquer Arabia. This was not an unknown area or culture to him, especially with the small kingdom of Nabataea nestled closely to Egypt’s eastern border. The south of Arabia was at this time well settled, and rich from the trade in Frankincense. He moved from Babylon, the major capital of his Empire, to Egypt over a few months, taking his time in order to be able to make an impression on the local populations and also to fully assemble the logistics required for a large expedition. In the mean time, Antipater had been sent to the city of Alexandria on the Indus, where the Indus fleet would be awaiting him. The plan was for a pincer movement across the inhabited areas of Arabia. The obvious weakness of this strategy was that communication between the two armies would be almost impossible until they drew relatively near, or would have to be done via ships sailing along a hostile coast.

10028.JPG

This coin was minted in 320BCE, and was part of a huge amount of currency minted in order to fund equipping and paying the vast army being assembled.

The Expedition Assembles

Before he left Babylon, Alexander had divided the Macedonian veterans that had remained in Babylonia between himself and Antipater. Skilled leaders such as Perdiccas and Ptolemy were divided between each army as well. Each army would be expected to call on contingents from various Macedonian garrisons and cities, but numbers would be made up with satrapal resources as well. This was hampered by the rebellion of those Saka tribes nominally under the authority of Alexander, Armenia, and parts of Arachosia that occured in the early part of 320BCE. But Alexander had access to Macedonian phalangites, some Macedonian heavy cavalry, and all of the inherited forces from the Achaemenid Empire. This might strike modern readers as strange, but it was general practice in the Near East that when a state was conquered by another, the conqueror would inherit the army of the recently conquered. So ancient Assyria acquired much of its manpower, and thus the brief Babylonian Empire, and the Achaemenids after them. Indeed, some of the forces available to Alexander were descended from brigades originally created in the 9th Century BCE by the Egyptians and Assyrians.

Those troops used to desert conditions were particularly highly prized by Alexander, and thus his force included Libyans, Nubians, Numidians, Egyptians, Medes, and even some Arab populations under his suzerainty. But the core of his forces remained Macedonian phalangites, supplemented by some Iranians, Chaldeans and Aramaics who had been trained as Phalangites. Their numbers were not great, as it would take many more years before the Argead Empire had access to large numbers of professional non-Macedonian phalangites, but it was a sign of developments to come.

The total of Alexander’s force is hard to judge, as it is difficult to trust any of the few extant biographical sources for Alexander with regards to numbers. But for certain it numbered in the tens of thousands. Obviously an army of this size needs feeding and watering, and fortunately Egypt proved an ideal base for exactly that; its huge agricultural produce was of extraordinary value, and would become even more so with the eventual rise of great megapoleis like Philloupolis, Alexandria in Arabia, Aleppo, Damascus, and some Egyptian grain cornels have been discovered in broken amphorae on the site of Alexandria on the Indus. Right now, its task was to feed and water the Royal Army of Alexander, a task it leaped to with what might seem surprising enthusiasm. A more difficult task was the transport of the army, as whilst there was something of a Red Sea fleet it was not in sufficient numbers to be able to transport a force of this size all at once. It seems that Alexander ordered the construction of purpose-built transports, especially ones capable of carrying horses easily, and rather than take the long and parched desert road overland he elected to ferry the army across to the north-west of Yemen in a series of trips. An advance force was sent to the oasis at Lathrippa in the September of 320BCE, and by October the first major force headed by Perdiccas was on its way.

073-450x451.jpg

The Vergina Sun, symbol of the King of Macedon and what would also become the symbol of the Argead Emperor.
 
Last edited:
Okay, so this is a rerun of a timeline I unintentionally abandoned much earlier this year in April. I attempted to ressurect the old thread recently, but I became disenchanted with the format I was presenting the timeline in. It was too much of a wall of text, as it was trying to be both a list of hard-events and give detailed descriptions at the same time.

So I have instead chosen to present the timeline in a different, more narrative perspective. If I am able to, I will be pursuing the ramifications of this timeline for as long as possible, especially since the changes will only become more pronounced over time.

I've also acquired a lot more knowledge of Near-Eastern Empires, cultures, and practices, and so I am actually rewriting some of this to make more sense.

If there's anything that's unclear, please feel free to ask. If there's anything you want more information on, I'd be happy to do so. I will be doing maps, though not constantly. Feedback is gloriously welcome.
 
The Last Years of Alexander the Great Part 2

"Are you still to learn that the end and perfection of our victories is to avoid the vices and infirmities of those whom we subdue?"




Delays and Excursions


Meanwhile, in the East of the Empire, Antipater’s progress was not nearly as smooth as that of his king. He had headed first for Persia, in order to pick up additional manpower and for horses, the Royal Road greatly speeding the army’s progress. By the end of March Antipater had left Susa, and headed for Alexandria in Elam. After another two weeks mustering more forces, he then left for Alexandria on the Indus, and the fleet that awaited him. But the Arachosian revolt had made the mountain passages dangerous, and he was forced to turn northward, towards Alexandria in Arachosia. It’s at this point that the historian has to lament Alexander’s complete lack of originality when founding cities. Pressing on, he found that the satrap of Arachosia had been held up in the capital for months under virtual siege, with hordes of hostile tribesmen roaming the hinterland almost at will and with stray bands of Saka horsemen raiding settlements and farms.

Antipater had no choice but to intervene, and used the authority granted to him by Alexander to replace the inept satrap of Arachosia with a Macedonian cavalry commander named Agelas. Ptolemy and Agelas were each given command of the fastest cavalry of Antipater’s army, and those local horsemen that could be relied upon. They were tasked to seek out and destroy the Saka raiding parties. Meanwhile the Royal Army travelled to every single settlement known in the nearby area, with Antipater demanding supplies for his expedition. The threat of force was enough to compel many pockets of resistance to submit, but a few resisted and their homes were ruthlessly pillaged. This process had finished by the end of May, but Antipater was keenly aware that he had to reach the Indus. He left Agelas with some of his Macedonians, and some Persian cavalry. He had to hope that this would be sufficient to keep the satrapy stable for the forseeable future.

By mid-June, Antipater had reached the Indus at last, and continued to hope that he would meet the arranged deadline for embarkation. Inevitably he found himself suddenly surrounded by crises threatening to destabilise the region, and he was forced to halt to sort things out as best he can; he knew that Alexander would be in Egypt by now and well outside easy communication range. First was a dispute amongst the inhabitants of Nikaia and Bucephela, twin cities founded across the middle path of the Indus, that threatened to spiral out of the control. The Hellenistic cities were vital to Argead control over such distant regions and stability was paramount. An agreement was brokered, but a significant portion of the Bucephelan elites immediately refused to recognise it. Sudden arrests by burly Iranians were enough to convince them to change their minds. Next was a spate of assassinations in the city of Taxila, which was apparently solved by the infiltration of the spy ring responsible. Suspicion was directed towards the new power in India Chandragupta Maurya, who was indeed laying covetous eyes upon the Empire’s Indian domains. This dazzling figure would become increasingly relevant to the affairs of the Argead Empire in the years to come.

Having finally achieved a measure of stability, Antipater strengthened the garrisons along the Indus before finally reaching Alexandria and the fleet. There is some confusion as to whether he reached the city in early September, tarried in the city until September, or the fleet could only set sail in September; the sources tend to vary depending on their bias, and most are mistrustful of Antipater. But by the 15th of September, BCE 320, Antipater, Ptolemy, the other officers of note, and the majority of his forces had finally embarked. The comedy of distractions was over.
sirkap06_road.jpg

The excavated main road of Taxila

The Conquest of Arabia

The first target on Alexander’s list was the Kingdom of Ma’in, which he had reached the borders of around December or early January. This state was the controller of the incense trade in Arabia, and of the Ma’rib dam; this vital lynchpin to the agriculture of Arabia has had an interesting life and it is still one of the region’s greatest treasures of antiquity. Controlling the water supply, even in an Arabia with a slightly milder climate than in the modern era, was crucial to Alexander’s conquest of the region. The force that bore down on the Minaeans was overwhelming. One never likes to imply the lesser value of a culture or group, but Ma’in was simply outnumbered, outmanouevered, and outfought. Alexander was a different man to each people he had conquered; to the Arabs he was magnanimous in victory, but harsh in justice.
Trying to earn the loyalty of natives was more necessity than altruism, supplies in such a relatively isolated country would be vital to the success of the expedition.

Following Ma’in, Sa’ba’s capital was taken, then Qataban, then Hadramut. Peoples virtually unknown to Cyrus, Sargon or Nebuchadnezzar were being forcibly exposed to a larger world. However, it was now March of 319 BCE, and there was no sign of Antipater and his expedition. The anecdotes about Alexander’s rage at this apparent betrayal should be taken with the same caution as all other reproductions of speeches and incidents in ancient historical works, but there can be no doubt that Alexander would have been extremely concerned. This only grew going from March into April, as attrition from disease and periodic ambushes had begun to reduce the Royal Army. Whilst the cities of ‘Arabia Eudaimon’ were well garrisoned and under control, decent sections of the hinterland were death to Macedonians or Macedonian sympathisers. The leader of the Sa’ba revolt tried to make use of this, by trying to get the non-Hellenic cohorts of the Royal Army to join their cause. Though this may simply have been propaganda designed to enhance the difficulty of the situation Alexander would subsequently retrieve, if this did occur then it gained absolutely no traction.

What was more effective was the systematic sabotage of the docks at key ports that Alexander was using to harbour his fleet. Mid-April was the absolute nadir of the campaign, with a real threat of part of the army starving due to a contraction on their supplies. However, on the 22nd of April, Alexander received the news he had been awaiting for almost half a year; Antipater had arrived.

Antipater and his force had actually arrived in late March, but had been heavily invested in occupying the Kingdom of Zuyar, and its capital of Iram. But now Ptolemy and a supporting force had crossed into Hadramut. With this extra manpower, Alexander began to root out and destroy the key elements of the revolts against him. In desperation, the Sabeans assembled an alliance of their armed forces, gave basic equipment to many of their poor, and marched against Alexander. The location of the battle is unknown, but all of the sources state that it was within sight of the Ma’rib dam. The battle was a victory, but became one of the most momentous dates in Greek history. Despite the advice of doctors and companions alike, Alexander had taken part in one of the key cavalry charges of the battle. He was found slain on the field, surrounded by dead enemies. And thus perished Alexander III of Macedon, son of Amon-Zeus, King of Asia, Master of Horses, Shahinshah, and I don’t doubt that this was exactly the kind of death that he would have asked for.

arabian%20camel%202.jpg

The Dromedary, which had been domesticated in Arabia since at least the 10th Century BCE.

1-al-m2.jpg
 
Everything checks out besides the Minor nitpick that the Camel was certainly not domesticated until the 6-4000s BC.
 
10th Century BCE is around 900sBC? I think you may have been confused into thinking I meant 10,000 BC.
 
I like this. Consider me subscribed. The format reminds me somewhat of my own TL. I really enjoy your attention to detail.

A map of the Arabian Expedition would be nice, cuz I have no idea where these places are.
 
Phoenix: The Death of Alexander the Great and the Birth of the Argead Empire

Part One: The Wars of Succession
greek-ruins.jpg


The death of Alexander in a foolhardy cavalry charge in deepest Arabia was the first great crisis to strike his new Empire, as his successor was young and vulnerable. That there would be a crisis was clear to all of the major players in Alexander’s close circle. However, there seems to have been a gentleman’s truce, and so the dispute was delayed until all sides had exited comfortably from the Arabian peninsular.

Indeed, Ptolemy took the time to construct a small but well-made tomb to Alexander, at the religious site of Makkah. He chose it due to its prior religious significance to the Arab peoples of the region, due to containing the artifact known as the Ka’ba, now believed to have been part of a meteorite. As the famous quote from later times goes, “Truly did Ptolemy know that the body of one so touched by God belonged with signs of God’s divine agency.”

So, who were the major players in the ensuing period? A generalising form of categorisation can be made, into the Alexandrian camp and the Pothos camp. The Greek pothos means longing, desire, ambition, and is a word often associated with Alexander III. These individuals all had a longing for individual power that overcame any responsibility they felt towards the legitimate succession of the Empire.

Dramatis Personae

comedy_and_drama_greek_mask1.jpg


Alexandrian Camp

Alexander IV
Son of Alexander III and his wife Roxanne, Alexander’s early life was fraught with peril. Any number of ambitious figures could easily have made a hostage out of him, or decided to seize the throne and assassinate him. However, successive regents were able to keep him safe from his enemies, though those seeking to blacken his character tended to emphasise the fact that the Persian nobility also took it upon themselves to help protect him. What this actually reflects is that all of the powerful groups in the forming Empire recognised Alexander as the best hope for a stable, powerful government. By 307 BCE, he was able to assert his authority as King of Asia, and by his death he had done the majority of the necessary work to turn the Argeads into a stable imperial dynasty.

Alexander V Nikator
Son of Alexander IV and Soroushi, Alexander V inherited a more stable Empire than his predeccesors in 288 BCE. He was able to reunify Macedon as part of his domains, reform its satrapies, and presided over the conclusion of the Succession Wars in 276 BCE. However, he will be irrelevant to much of the narrative, since the majority of the actual fighting between potential successors to Alexander occurred in the reign of his father.

Perdiccas
Loyal head of Alexander III’s bodyguard, and officially recognised Regent for Alexander IV, Perdiccas acted as a stabilising figure from 318 BCE until his untimely assassination in 311 BCE. During this time, he successfully re-established imperial authority in regions that had broken off during the last years of Alexander III, such as Armenia, Cappadocia, Parthia, and Sogdia, and began extension of the famous ‘Royal Road’ that linked vital central cities of the Empire together.

Antipater
1065_Antipater.jpg

Beginning as satrap of Babylonia, Antipater quickly became one of the most influential members of Perdiccas’ regency. Whilst he respected Perdiccas’ leadership, he had fingers in several pies, and family ties to one or two of Perdiccas’ opponents; he was probablyy responsible for the decision in Macedonia to crown Kassander king in 312 BCE. After the assassination of Perdiccas, he became regent for Alexander IV, and attempted to deal with the increasingly military character of the conflicts between the Argead dynasty and figures refusing to acknowledge its hegemony. But in March 309 BCE, he was assassinated himself.

Seleukos
seleukos.jpg

Seleukos’ history prior to becoming involved in the regency is difficult to speculate upon, other than the fact that he served Alexander III and was clearly a capable commander. He became truly prominent when the combined deaths of Perdiccas, Antigonos, and Antipater had left him as the most apparent regent for Alexander IV. This is a role he carried out with distinction and merit, and had he chosen to he could easily have been a King or Emperor of his very own. He successfully fought off Ptolemy I from the Empire’s Syrian possessions, leaving Alexander IV able to claim the throne without dispute. He continued to serve the Argead Empire as one of its most senior generals and advisors, and lived throughout the entirety of the Succession Wars, dying peacefully in 275 BCE as one of the most beloved figures in the Argead Empire outside of the Royal Family. It is often said that he was fortunate, as such a popular and talented figure in many monarchies would have been deemed dangerous and been killed.

Demetrios
Son of Antigonos, he briefly became hostile to the Argead Empire when he resurrected the short-lived Pergamene realm in 293 BCE. However, Seleukos was able to defeat his army in the field the next year, and the terrifying majesty of Alexander IV was enough to make Demetrios repent, and recognise the Kingship of the Argead Empire. He then became one of the most battle-scarred satraps in the whole Empire, spending many years fighting wars in and around the Aegean on behalf of his sovereign.

Antigonos
Another general of Alexander III, he seems to have been the lesser figure in the Regency period. He played no visible role in the military ventures or expeditions of the Empire, but may have been a politically potent individual, as he was marked for death at the same time as Perdiccas in 311 BCE.

Eumenes
Many things have been speculated about this figure in scholarly debate on the period, but it seems clear that he harboured resentment against the Macedonians in the Argead cockpit, and it seems likely that he was responsible for the murder of Antipater. Having been Royal Secretary to Alexander III despite being a Kardian, he must clearly have been a man of talents. But his vice appears to have been avarice, jealously guarding the wealth that he was in control of. It is telling that he disappears from the historical record after 305 BCE without much demur.

Lysimachos
lysimachus_selcuk.JPG

It is a shame that we have such little information about such an intriguing figure. He was close friends with Kassander, a man with many vaulted ambitions, but despite that he remained loyal to the Argead cause in difficult circumstances, and fell in battle defending Macedon from an Illyrian incursion in 311 BCE. Whether he could have bridged the gap between the Macedonian intrigues and the Argead royalty, and avoided the several wars fought over Macedon in the coming decades, will remain a matter of deepest speculation.

Eurydice
The wife of Phillip III Arhidaeus, she remains one of the most brilliant figures of the period. Many ancient sources betray their fear of her rise to prominence in their scorn, as do many scholars of centuries past. She seems to have had origins from one of the many Thracian-aligned tribes to to the north of Macedon, and was wed to a member of the Macedonian royal family, who became Phillip III. However, she was brought up as much a warrior as a wife, being trained with bow and axe and used to leading companies of warriors. These skills were well-used after Olympias executed her husband in 315 BCE. She managed to resist two sieges in the (at that point relatively undeveloped) polis of Byzantion, and successfully gained free passage from Kassander in 313 BCE. The next few years she spent in the protection of Menandros, then in 310 BCE she left his custody, just as the Succession Wars were beginning in earnest. She then fought and talked her way into custody over a large section of North Anatolia, and showed her true intentions in declaring for Alexander IV and his regents. Her deeds earned such renown that she was officially recognised as satrap in 302 BCE, which was unprecedented. She died in 298, but her matriarchal dynasty would continue, and she was one of the fiercest allies Alexander IV had on his side.

Phillip III Arhidaeus
20645_4052_1_md.jpg

This wretched and tragic figure was clearly retarded from birth, but he had his brother Alexander III’s trust and love. This only magnifies the cruelty of Olympias, who had him killed barely a year after being declared King of Macedon in 316 BCE. His body was laid in honour in Aigai by Kassander later, a site which has yet to be discovered. Phillip’s treatment at the hands of Olympias was a harbinger of things to come.

Pothos Camp

Ptolemy I
PtolemyISoter.jpg

The greatest of those who sought independence from the Argead dynasty, Ptolemy was a canny and decisive individual. A member of Alexander III’s bodyguards, he launched an abortive attempt to gain control of the Regency over Alexander IV in 311 BCE. Failing that, he acquired a power base in Egypt that was nearly unassailable due to the might of the Egyptian Mediterranean fleet and the difficulty of entering into Egypt. Hostility turned into open war with the Argead Regency. He successfully contested Arabia with the Argead Empire over a long period, but defeats by Seleukos kept him from entering Syria. These wars came to an end after Alexander IV’s coming of age, but Ptolemy retained de facto control over a much larger territory than he should as nominal satrap to the King. He co-operated with the removal of Menandros from Macedon in 303-302 BCE, but then he and his son Ptolemy Keraunos both attacked the Empire. At their height in 301 BCE the Ptolemies controlled Macedon, much of Hellas, Egypt, Kyrenakia and Arabia, but a ceasefire was drawn up in 300 BCE recognising the status quo. From 297 BCE however, his unruly son had given Ptolemy cause for disquiet, and in 296 BCE open hostilities began. The long war in Greece and Macedon continued for 5 years, until in a moment of triumph Ptolemy was struck down by an assassin in October 291 BCE. Wise, soulful, and a true born sovereign, Ptolemy laid down the foundations of a strong Egyptian dynasty.

Ptolemy Keraunos
A brutal, cavalier figure, Ptolemy was initially his father’s favoured lieutenant, and had taken control of Macedon in 302 BCE by killing Menandros the previous usurper. Fighting first against his King, and then against his own father, Ptolemy Keraunos was a justly hated figure in antiquity. Nonetheless, his control over Macedon was strong, and at times he had full control over the mainland of Hellas. However, in his death against a Gaulish horde in 279 BCE is seen as a redeeming act, helping to secure all Hellenic peoples against a barbarian incursion and indirectly restoring the Argead dynasty to the lordship of Macedonia.

Ptolemy II Philadelphos
220px-Oktadrachmon_Ptolemaios_II_Arsinoe_II.jpg

A figure greatly concerned with pomp and circumstance, Ptolemy II nonetheless strengthened his dynasty in Egypt immensely after Ptolemy’s death in 291 BCE. Whilst claiming independence from the Argead Empire, he nonetheless declined to actively fight against Alexander IV, and in 276 BCE he agreed to a binding treaty that brought the Succession Wars to its definitive close. Whilst exotic, native traditions had penetrated into what should have been a hardy Macedonian mind, he raised his father and his dynasty to the status of Gods, which allowed the Ptolemaic dynasty to retain control over Egypt for long afterwards. The splendour of his reign is well attested both textually and materially.

Kassander
ancg-mak-sg6754-1.jpg

Kassander comes across as one of the most heroic of those outside of Argead control, though at times his loyalties seem almost impossible to accurately discern. He took de facto control of Macedon in 315 BCE, initially allying himself with Olympias the mother of Alexander III. He fought twice against Eurydice in the field at Byzantion, but in 312 BCE he was crowned King of Macedon properly, possibly due to Antipater’s influence. During his coronation a disaffected Macedonian noble attempted to assassinate him, but this was unsuccessful. From 310 BCE onwards he began to co-operate with the Argead Regency directly in order to deal with Menandros, the greatest threat to Macedon at that time, and by 308 BCE he had lost all reason to remain pragmatically aligned with Olympias and pursued open warfare against her. He also now allied himself to Eurydice, in a reversal of their relations only a few years previously. Initially he was successful in pushing Olympias out of Macedon and into the quasi-hellenic federation of Epirus. But her return in 306 BCE resulted in his capture after a heroic last cavalry stand, and the next year he was executed.

Leonnatus
A strange figure, Leonattus originally became prominent after his successful defeat of the Hellenes at Lamia in 309 BCE. He then married the widow of Alexander of Epirus, Kleopatra, enormously increasing his prestige. For years he avoided the intrigues of the Macedonian court, intervening when Menandros began to expand dangerously into Macedonian territory in 307 BCE, creating a permanent blood feud between the two men. He co-operated with the Argead attack upon Menandros, before finally returning to Macedon in 305 BCE after the death of Kassander at Olympias’ hands. He executed her shortly afterwards, finally ridding Macedon of the menace which had plagued it for years, and became Steward of Macedon in the stead of Alexander IV until he could be crowned. However, Menandros then overran Macedon and displaced Leonnatus, who escaped to the court of Alexander IV. However, in 297 Leonnatus returned to Europe, to resurrect the Federation of Epirus with himself at its head. He then fought alongside Ptolemy the Elder against Keraunos in 292-291 BCE, losing himself an eye in the process. In 279 BCE, shortly before his natural death, he successfully helped to fight off the massive Gaulish incursion into Hellenic territories, and it was his dynasty that would make Epirus prominent in the decades ahead.

Menandros
Menandros was perhaps the greatest scourge that the Aegean, Anatolia and Macedon faced in this period. Beginning in 311 BCE, he began to aggressively expand into other satrapies in Anatolia, and at one point he controlled almost the entirety of Anatolia. Seleukos managed to push him back into Cappadokia in Central Anatolia in 308 BCE, but this instead made Menandros turn his attention to the unstable Macedonian heartland. Leonnatus managed to delay his expansion for a time by destabilising Ionia. And in 306 BCE, Menandros found himself surrounded by 3 large armies, hemmed into his hinterlands in Pergamon. But by 305 BCE they were forced to give up, due to crises elsewhere and their inability to force the issue. Menandros wasted no time in taking advantage of this unexpected reprieve, as he was an opportunist of the worst sort. And in 303 BCE he managed to displace the rightful Steward of Macedon and gain control of Macedon. The stage was set for his cruel domination to extent right across the entirety of the Aegean. But the very next year, the equally brutal Ptolemy Keraunos managed to capture him, and executed him, ending his bloody campaigns and preventing the creation of a fully autonomous Pergamene state.

Olympias
Perhaps no figure from this period is more justifiably infamous than Olympias. Killer of Kings, usurper, devastator, many titles and epithets have been attached to this wretched, selfish and cruel woman across the centuries. Even before Alexander III died, she had taken control of Macedonia, and had extended her tyranny into Hellas. She was directly responsible for the orator Demosthenes’ death in 323BCE, and devasted much of Hellas simply to prove a point in 319 BCE. In 315 BCE she had the crowned King of Macedon, Phillip III, killed, and had Kassander attempt to mete out the same treatment to the dead King’s wife Eurydice. She manipulated the court in Kassander’s absence, though the resentment that the loyal and noble members of the aristocracy felt at her was enough to overcome these cronies when they elected Kassander as King in 312 BCE. In 308 BCE she provoked true civil war in Macedon, and to top infamy upon infamy she had Kassander killed after his capture in 305 BCE. Few people indeed in history have multiple Kings as notches on their belt. But Leonnatus finally managed to bring her to an end later that year. She had an almost cult-like status for the more easily swayed of the Macedonians as Alexander III’s mother, but across the course of her tyranny she managed to alienate nearly all of these individuals, and after her death the Macedonians did their best to forget her and move on. Of all the individuals involved in the Succession Wars, it is Olympias who was subject to ridicule in Hellenic drama, and it is hardly difficult to see why.

Choral-Drama.jpg


OOC NB: This author is from an earlier point in history than the author from the first two chapters, and he has neglected to engage in any kind of source criticism; he is often taking the ancient sources verbatim. But he is still accurately able to describe the people and events of the time period, albeit very judgementally. This is also why he is so gushy about certain figures from the time period. He’s a useful demonstration of the historiographical traditions associated with the Succession Wars as well as the events by themselves. The style of writing is approximately that of circa 1900-1945 writers on a lot of ancient history from our timeline.
 
I know your thread is focused on Arabia, but is there any way you can have a successor to Seleucus (someone like the OTL Antiochus III) conquer northern India in the wake of the collapse of the Maurya dynasty?
 
This TL is astounding!

A more somewhat stable Alexandrian Empire! Can't wait to see what happens when the Gauls of Brennos invade, or what Pyrrhus of Epirus ends up doing, OR even what's going to happen with Rome and Carthage expanding their influence!
 
Phoenix: The Death of Alexander the Great and the Birth of the Argead Empire

Part One: The Wars of Succession
greek-ruins.jpg


An Account of the Wars by Theatre
3076s1.jpg


Egypt and the East Mediterranean

Upon the death of Alexander III in 319 BCE, the vast territories of Egypt were given to Ptolemy I to rule as satrap under the nominal authority of Perdiccas as regent of the Empire. In practice, he had control of an entire nation; rich, ancient and developed, Egypt had known civilization for longer than the word ‘hellenic’ had even existed. At first, Ptolemy governed as satrap. But over time, the vast resources at his disposal presented opportunities. He developed strong ties to the Empire’s Arabian holdings, and nurtured strong ambitions.

Upon the death of Perdiccas in 311 BCE, he aimed to become Regent for Alexander IV. However, Antipater was able to forcibly block his passage out of Egypt, and thus the war began in earnest. Ptolemy led a series of incursions into Argead territory, first against Antipater’s generals and then against Seleukos. In 308 BCE, Ptolemy had managed to advance as far as Damascos in Syria, but he was defeated there by Seleukos, and was forced to retreat to Gaza. The residents of Gaza made life very difficult for Ptolemy’s forces, and he withdrew to his capital Alexandria.

In 307 BCE Ptolemy switched focus, and aimed to take control of the Greek polis of Kyrene. Rather than attempt to stand up to him, Kyrene chose to seek terms, and in the following treaty were given the status of an allied region to Egypt.

002-Egyptian-Frieze-1.jpg


For the next few years, Egypt was at peace; the Argeads were busy elsewhere, and Ptolemy was consolidating his control over the native Egyptians. In 303 BCE Ptolemy was tasked with aiding Alexander IV, now crowned King, with subduing a rogue satrap. He obliged, and sent a force to help. But the next year he sensed opportunity, and launched a direct attack on the Argead Empire. His first attempt to enter into Syria was rebuffed by Seleukos near Jerusalem, though not decisively. In 301 BCE things began to turn against him, as Argead ships began to blockade Egypt’s Red Sea ports, and a second battle of Jerusalem

The island of Cyprus had to strive throughout this period to remain independent, and the differing opinions of the Kingdoms on the island as to who to support in the war only enhanced this problem. However, in 301 BCE those who had formerly supported Ptolemy of Egypt changed their minds, and the island was opened up to the ships of Alexander IV. In 299 BCE, a formal treaty of alliance was signed by the major Kingdoms on the island with Alexander IV, rendering it a de facto possession of the Argead Empire. And in 276 BCE the city of Marion was the site in which the treaty that finally ended the Succession Wars was signed.

There were occasional rebellions against Argead authority throughout this period; many were due to the influence of outside powers, and on most occasions were resolved with a sufficient show of force.

A-History-of-Writing-3.jpeg


Hellas and the Aegean Isles

A widespread rebellion in Hellas had already begun before Alexander III had reached Arabia.Shortly before his death, Elis was the only Hellenic polis that Macedon controlled south of Thebes on the mainland. Corinth was persuaded by coin and expediency to bend to the side of Macedon, and allowed a Macedonian army led by Olympias into the Peloponnese. In 319 BCE, Aetolia was silenced, and then after crossing the Gulf of Calcydon Achaea, Arcadia, and Argolis were all pacified by the sword. Much of the countryside was devastated by this. Only the draw of winter prevented Olympias from attacking Athens.

But then the news of Alexander III’s death reached Macedon, and Olympias withdrew to Macedon in order to secure her own position, and Attika was saved. The Athenians were naturally delighted. In 316 BCE, Sparta and Athens began to develop strong ties in order to better resist the Macedonians, and they would remain the nucleus of the panhellenic movement in Hellas. Athens attempted to use soft power to erode Macedonian influence, particularly in the Chersonese. This paid off in 311 BCE, when Perdiccas was assassinated, as they were able to inspire a general Hellenic revolt, including many of the important Aegean states such as Delos, Rhodes, and Samos. But in 309 BCE, they were again confronted by a Macedonian army, led this time by Leonnatus. Both sides were content to manoeuvre for a few weeks, but near Lamia they met in open battle.

The defeat suffered there was enough to convince much of Hellas to recant, and Macedonian garrisons were replanted throughout major poleis. In 308 BCE, the Spartans founded the League of Persian Remembrance, aimed at defending Hellas from the ‘Medising’ influences of the Argead Empire. This at first led to nothing, as none of the cities would consider armed rebellion with Leonnatus still encamped in Elis. But this alliance would have a long history to come.

default.jpg


Hellas remained quiet for the next few years, with Rhodes, Athens and Sparta all managing to continue to be independent.But beginning in 304 BCE , the activities of Menandros drew the attention of powerful figures to this region, and panhellenic ideology became a tool to be used to gain allies in the war. Thessaly, Euboea and Arcadia ally themselves with Menandros. The Athenians and Spartans are unable to form a cohesive alliance with the newly revolted Hellenes, and barely two years later they themselves are bound under the dominance of Ptolemy Keraunos, with Macedonian ‘observers’ in place to guarantee their good behaviour.

They found a new opportunity to assert themselves a few years later, when Ptolemy Keraunos and his father went to war and the latter landed in Hellas in 295 BCE. The Athenians, Corinthians, Spartans, Arcadians and Achaeans all rally behind the elder Ptolemy, who promises true liberty. Among the Hellenes of the mainland, he was forever known as Ptolemy Soter, ‘saviour’. But in 291 BCE, he was assassinated. However, Alexander IV had seemed likely to intervene. Major events elsewhere forced him to turn back at the last minute, but the Hellenes found themselves with an unexpected champion after Alexander IV placed them under his protection. Thus all Hellenic poleis south of Thessaly were protected from Ptolemy Keraunos’ expansionistic tendencies.

In the wake of this, a Hellenic League was formed, which the Aegean Islanders declined to join. But made up of the most major cities of Hellas, it presented a formidable obstacle to anyone seeking to dominate it. The peaceful situation this created came to an end in 281 BCE, as the polis of Taras appealed on behalf of the Hellenic colonies in Italy for aid against the city of Rome. This hitherto unknown people were now masters of much of Italy, and were seeking to add ‘Magna Graecia’ to their territory. In a wave of patriotic and panhellenic fervour, an expedition was launched. But the very next year this turned to panic, as a horde of Gauls and other ‘barbaroi’ under the major warlord Brennos had gathered on the borders of Epirus, Thrace, and Macedonia.

The combined efforts of Alexander IV, Ptolemy Keraunos, Leonnatus of Epirus and Antigonos Gonatas were enough to repel Brennos, and Hellas was saved from the danger. This situation directly led to the Treaty of Marion in 276 BCE, which ended the Succession Wars and led to the legal definition of Ptolemaic Egypt, the Argead Empire, the Hellenic League, and Epirus.

Overall, this period saw the rebirth of a panhellenic ideology in much of mainland Greece, in a way that hadn’t been genuinely seen since the Persian War nearly two centuries beforehand. After being the plaything of princes, warlords and kings, it was able to assert its own independence, at least for a time.

3.jpg


India

The provinces of the Argead Empire towards the lower reaches of the river Indus were particularly rich in gold. Thus it is unsurprising that this would attract attention. Separate to the events further east, India had seen a change since Alexander III’s invasion some years prior. The new power was the Maurya Empire, under Chandragupta Maurya. In 315 BCE, he saw his chance, and overran the Indian satrapies of the Argead Empire. It was some time before anyone was able to respond to this, but in 305 BCE Alexander IV declared his intent to retake the lost satrapies, and conducted his first muster of a Royal Army. This whole occasion presented an enormous opportunity to increase his personal prestige and that of the Empire as a whole.

By Feburary of 304 BCE, the army was ready, having assembled at Alexandria on the Indus. This was the only Indian regional capital left in Argead hands at the time. Alexander IV had a far greater awareness of peculiarities relating to India than his father had, and he aimed to conclude his campaign against Chandragupta before the onset of the monsoon season in June. Striking quickly, he went first for the twin cities of Bucephela and Nikaia. The Helleno-Macedonian colonists betrayed the cities to the besieging army, and thus these major centres were retaken before Chandragupta had been able to respond. However, Alexander knew the campaign would not remain this easy, and correctly assumed that Chandragupta would be waiting for him at Taxila. The two armies met, and it seemed battle would be joined.

The incident of Alexander IV’s Parley with ‘Sandrocottos’ (as Chandragupta was known to the Hellenes) has become too quasi-mythical for a work such as this to spend time dealing with. What is known to be solid fact is that the two Emperors managed to hammer out a deal that left the Argeads in possession with all the lands west of the Acesines-Indus river line, and the Maurya Empire with everything East of that line. An alliance seems to have been formed, though at the time it is doubtful that this was taken to be particularly binding. Overall, it would seem to be a superb triumph of realpolitik and statesmanship over the blunter force of open warfare.

Afterwards, the Indian satrapies of the Empire were quiescent for the entire duration of the Succession Wars.

h2_2000.284.10.jpg


Bactria

Whilst well under the thumb of the Argead dynasty during this time, this satrap was still notable for the frequency of raids by Saka nomads that must be seen to contribute to the taxing responsibilities of Imperial forces at this time. This would occur usually every four years, with the most major occasion being in 297 BCE when a particularly large force was able to besiege the major city of Marakanda, bypassing the more well defended Alexandria Eschate completely. However, the satrap of Bactria was able to move up a force of sufficient size to force the withdrawal of the raiders. This was followed up by a policy of strengthening the fortifications of the cities bordered by Saka territory. Whilst other raids did occur after 297 BCE, none were able to threaten Imperial control in such a way for the rest of the Succession Wars.

Indo-Greek%20coin%20from%20the%20Hellenistic%20period.jpg


Epirus

Debates have raged for a long time as to whether the Epriote Federation were Hellenic or merely culturally aligned with the Hellenes; nonetheless, its close proximity to Macedon and Hellas brought destruction and destabilization in the early years of this period.
For a time, Aeacides managed to steer the Epirotes away from conflict, but this period came to an end in 306 BCE; Olympias and the battered remnants of her army sought refuge and aid from Epirus, and Aeacides was inclined to provide her with both. After Olympias successfully defeated Kassander however, the Federation revolted against Aeacides as they found being in the service of such a woman distasteful in the extreme. He and his son, Pyrrhus, were forced to flee. But Olympias’ revenge against the Epirotes was swift and terrible, and had many of the leaders of the three Epirote tribes executed. Fortunately by the end of 305 BCE, she herself had been dispatched by Leonnatus.

Meanwhile, Pyrrhus and his father had entered the service of Alexander IV, and both accompanied him on his campaign against Chandragupta Maurya. However, Aeacides died of disease during the campaign, and Pyrrhus was unable to return home due the the renewed civil war in Macedon. This left the Epirotes to continue to suffer under Macedonian domination, effectively leaderless. Pyrrhus, being of restless spirit, decided that Epirus was lost; he was presented with new and exotic opportunities, and in 302 BCE he took advantage of the Argead-Maurya alliance in order to enter the service of Chandragupta Maurya, along with a core group of loyal Epirote retainers. At this point he passes out of historical records, though fragments from various periods indicate that he may have survived well into the reign of Chandragupta’s grandson, Ashoka the Great; it is likely that these are fanciful stories, and nothing more.

Fortunately for Epirus, not all was lost; Leonnatus took advantage of Ptolemy Keraunos becoming distracted, and claimed leadership of the Epirotes through his marriage to Kleopatra the widow of Alexander of Epirus. In 297 BCE, the Epirote Federation was resurrected as an independent polity. Many of the Macedonian garrison forces had intermarried into the Epirote population and had defected, and the Macedonian armies sent to stop Leonnatus were defeated in detail. The resurrected Epirote state was founded by warfare, and it would continue to define it for the following decades. In 291 BCE, Leonnatus intervened in Macedon by joining forces with Ptolemy the Elder, and reconquered previously Epirote territory that was still occupied by Macedon.

After the conclusion of the war, Leonnatus turned his attention north, to Illyria. Using a combination of military strength and wise diplomacy, he was able to bring the hellenised Illyrian cities into his sphere of influence. The influx of currency and trade this brought, not to mention manpower, went a long way towards helping Epirus recover. Epirus was thrust into the forefront of affairs again in 279 BCE, when the previously mentioned Brennos led his hordes in an attempt to pillage all in his path. Leonnatus was able to prevent the incursion from penetrating deeply into Epirote territory, though he died not long afterwards in his sleep. He was succeeded by his son by Kleopatra, Alexander, and the stage was set for the Leonnatid dynasty to prosper.

6156491408_9fd05dcfe3.jpg


Anatolia

This region was even more war-torn in this period than Epirus, and for a time it seemed doomed to be broken up among petty princes and warlords. Several rebellious provinces here had been successfully pacified by Perdiccas in the years of his regency, and for a time all was well. However, the ambitions of Menandros would change all of this. Following Perdiccas’ assassination in 311 BCE, he acquired delusions of grandeur and began to usurp the authority of nearby satrapies to his own. Finding Antipater’s responses lacking, he then began the process of active military conquest; for all his inflated ego, Menandros was genuinely a man of military competence. Over the next few years, many satraps were to die in battle against Menandros, and by 308 BCE he stood poised to take control of the entirety of Anatolia save for those realms under the control of Eurydice.

Fortunately, Seleukos was on hand to deal with him, and by the end of 308 BCE Menandros’ territory had been reduced greatly. One has to admire the tenacity of the man, as he immediately switched fronts and decided to attack Macedon in the midst of its civil wars. However, the landing of Leonnatus in Ionia was enough to cause a temporary retreat in his otherwise relentless campaigning. Ionia had varied governance at the time, in some cases democracies and in other cases oligarchies. But all of them had been infiltrated with pro-Menandros cronies, and it was the removal of many of these by Leonnatus that had caused such alarm. This was then compounded the very next year; Seleukos, Eurydice of Pontos, and Leonnatus all united in their cause of utterly destroying Menandros.

But truly tenacious defending by Menandros’ forces was enough to at least slow down the forces arrayed against him. And in 305 BCE, Leonnatus was forced to withdraw upon the death of Kassander in Macedon. Similarly, Seleukos was forced to retreat to deal with more pressing issues, and Eurydice also withdrew due to the relatively diminutive size of her own contingents. Menandros seized the moment and took control of Macedon in 303 BCE. But the next year, Ptolemy Keraunos executed him, and the majority of Menandros’ great realm then defaulted to the control of local officials and potentates. This was then reincorporated into the Argead Empire by various satraps.

The devastation to much of Central Anatolia had been severe, though the region knew peace for the next decade. Then Demetrios son of Antigonos, murdered regent for Alexander IV, entered the picture. He reassembled part of the Pergamene realm that Menandros’ had formed. This was done in 294-293 BCE, but the timing of this had been poor; Alexander IV was at the head of the Royal Army in Anatolia only the next year. Fortunately for his head, Demetrios chose to recognise Alexander as his King, and the Pergamene state was once again reincorporated into the Argead Empire.

Aside from periodic raids of Lesbos and some of the coastal cities of Anatolia by Ptolemy Keraunos, no other conflicts of note would take place in Anatolia for the rest of the Succession Wars.

Pergamon.jpg


Arachosia

This region had been brutally pacified by Alexander III, and the anger at this had remained fresh. It had been pacified by Antipater before the death of Alexander, but when Perdiccas’ attempted to extend the Royal Road through this satrapy it resulted in another uprising. This was met with renewed brutality, as the Empire could not allow anyone attempting to interfere with its infrastructure to go unpunished, and by Perdiccas’ death in 311 BCE Arachosia became quite depopulated. The result of this was that the Empire began to resettle other subject peoples in this area, in addition to the Hellenic colonists already living there. This policy of resettlement, an ancient technique in the Near East, would continue and expand after the end of the Succession Wars. As it was, for the remainder of this period Arachosia was peaceful but poor. It would take decades for the satrapy to become prosperous and to recover from its brutal pacification at the hands of Alexander III, Antipater, and Perdiccas.

kandahar.jpg
 
I have a map done for the Argead World post 276 BCE, however I am unable to get it to co-operate and zoom in closely enough for people to see it properly. It's a shame because it's a really pretty blank map that I have for it.

That update took a while to finish! I'll be switching away from this 'author' as a style, I've had enough of writing like a cultural imperialist!

Would people like me to continue chronologically, or post some information to do with the Argead Empire's inner workings? Of course, I can try to mix the two together :p.
 
I think I need to change my underwear. That was amazing! Pyrrhus in the Mauryan Empire! AAAAUGGGGGHHHH!!!!!
 
Would people like me to continue chronologically, or post some information to do with the Argead Empire's inner workings? Of course, I can try to mix the two together :p.

I love your timeline, and with regard to your question, I think this is a good time to take stock of the Argead Empire in the wake of Alexander the Great's death before moving on.
 
Languages in the Early Argead Period

Seleucid-Inscription-YavnehYam12.jpg


Like the Achaemenids before them, the Macedonians and Hellenes under the Argead Emperors had control of a staggering variety of peoples, cultures and tongues. But the Persians were never particularly interested in linguistic unity throughout their domains. For sons of Alexander, this was not quite the case. Control of the Empire was partially maintained through regional capitals, founded either by Alexander III or by later Kings, that were dominated by Hellenic and Macedonian colonists. This left those culturally aligned to the Emperor in a place of dominance over communication, trade, and to a certain extent religion, even in satrapies far from the centre of the Empire in Babylonia. Coupled with the fact that Greek was the language of power in the Empire, this then formed the basis for widespread adoption of Greek language and Greek script in diverse and wide-ranging areas.

Administratively, Greek was certainly king; this was the language that satraps and allied kings/states were expected to communicate to the King in. The need for translators facilitated a measure of control over distant courts, for these translators were of course provided by the state. Greek was used for day to day administrative activities; record keeping, calculations, notes, transcripts. But not wanting to alienate a huge swathe of their subjects, at first the civil service also used Aramaic. This meant both that important documents had two copies, and that there was a way of integrating the previous administrative pedigree of natives to the Near East; Assyria, Babylon and the surrounding areas had been privy to developments in governmental infrastructure before Hellas was even a recognisable entity.

As for the Greek of those to whom it was a first language, how did they communicate to each other? For all that they were mostly mutually comprehensible, there were several clear dialects with grammatical differences even across the tribes of Hellas and Ionia, let alone including Macedonians, Hellenised Illyrians, Epirotes and Hellenised Anatolians such as the Lydians. Initially, the Attic form of the Greek language was used, being the dialect most associated with literature. For daily conversation, it is likely that the first Argead Emperors still used their own Macedonian dialect, as Macedonians (as opposed to other Greek speakers) were the cultural group with the most authority in the Empire.

This would change over time; Hellenic culture was now international, not only in the sense of having become an export and a tool for Empire but also because previously disparate Hellenes had a sense of a shared ‘Hellenistic’ world. ‘Koine’ Greek, meaning common, seems to appear in the reign of Alexander V for the first time. This standardised Greek grammar and pronunciation to a previously unheard-of degree. This is not to say that dialects had vanished, simply that standardisation benefited an Empire as large as the Argead.

What other languages would have been prominent in the Argead Empire aside from Greek and Aramaic? Elamite had lost its status as the language of administration, but the continued presence of Persians and other Iranian peoples in the high echelons of Argead society meant that it continued to have status. Akkadian cuneiform culture appears to have been able to survive despite the apparent victory of alphabetic scripts, but as a language for astronomy and religion with its importance ever decreasing. Arabic became important due to their long borders with Argead territory and their industrious traders, along with the fact that the Argeads controlled the Eastern half of the Arabian peninsula. It was not a language of ‘high culture’, but it was a language of trade. It was the kind of language that a general, priest, or high magistrate would refuse to learn, but that would open many doors for merchants and satraps.

This is the picture created from the first century or so of the Argeads. Over time, this model would again change, and in many cases directly due to the Argead Empire itself. Not for nothing has the Argead Empire been called ‘history’s most potent agent for demographic change in Western Asia’.

End of Author A

Administration of Empire: Tools Technology and Tenacity

sennacherib.jpg


We now turn to the Argead Empire, successor to the older Near Eastern Empires but also a new breed entirely. The majority of history’s Empires relied upon allied but autonomous regions as much as those administrated directly, and the Argead Emperors were no exception. The difference is the degree to which this was actually widened in scope to begin with; in Hellas, the basic political unit was the autonomous city state, the polis. This could become part of an alliance, or a federation of multiple city-states, or lose control of its foreign policy to an outside power. But nonetheless, the polis would retain control over the majority of legal and administrative matters, and in many cases the citizens would never feel the presence of outside hands. This was the perfect form of that model.

In practice, of course cities interfered with the daily affairs of others around them, and we have prominent examples in history like the Peloponnesian Wars where Hellenic poleis actively sought to gain sovereignty over others. The key part of the issue is the idea of the polis and its hinterland as being the basic unit of government in Hellenic political thought. Though Macedon had a tradition of competing Kingdoms rather than city-states, this is a model that they had begun to co-opt. Alexander III had founded maybe fifteen cities across Asia in this manner. The polis as a technique for controlling satrapal populations was a thought that emerged early on, which is why the Achaemenid Royal Road was extended into the eastern satrapies. There are however two kings of polis to distinguish here; the first is the satrapal capital, and these were either taken directly from the Achaemenid system or were founded by Alexander III in his campaigns. The second is the non-capital polis, i.e a self governing city under the authority of the Emperor. The boundaries between these two are often fluid, as a dissolved satrapy would then result in a city losing its capital status, or conversely the division of satrapies could create a capital out of a formerly ‘unimportant’ city.

There was a third kind of city inherited from the Achaemenids, which was the ‘Royal city’; whilst a city would normally be built in a location that guaranteed natural growth, sometimes cities would be built on a scale far greater than the local area would support without highly developed logistics. These were often built either as military hubs, or for prestige. The Neo-Assyrian Empire had constructed vast palatial cities that had served almost entirely for propaganda purposes, though by the time of Alexander IV these had already become abandoned ruins. The Achaemenids had some cities built in such a way, though the Achaemenid Emperors had often preferred the creation of ‘paradises’, man-made oases in unlikely conditions. Those cities in this style that had existed before the coming of Alexander III continued to be used, but no additional ones were built; the Argead Emperors after him preferred to rely on self-sustaining cities. The Argeads preferred to enhance pre-existing cities with monumental architecture.

Those polis not designated as a satrapal capital could go one of two ways; often, the satrap would retain nominal control over the city in question but in practice usually allowed self-governance, though this was not always the case. However, sometimes they would be the ‘Emperor’s City’, by which it meant that the city’s freedom and security were guaranteed directly by the Argead Emperor and as such functioned outside of the satrapal system. This was intended to be a bulwark against satrapal rebellion, acting as a proto-centralization of government in an age before true centralization was even technologically possible.

The Satrapal System under the Argead Dynasty

satrap.JPG


Speaking of satraps, this system of governance was adopted directly from the Achaemenid Empire, with Alexander III effectively adopting it wholesale. This was not to remain the case, firstly as Perdiccas, Seleukos, Alexander IV and Alexander V all added new territory to the Empire, and secondly because the entire institution saw some far reaching reforms. This happened in the reign of Alexander V, who was probably the greatest administrative mind of the entire 3rd century BCE. He greatly reduced the size of satrapies, in order to leave satraps unable to effectively marshal resources to challenge the authority of the Emperor. This was excepted in the case of ‘marches’, border regions facing hostile territory, which were often far larger. Each of these smaller satrapies was centered around an important city which was to provide the manpower for defence. As was mentioned previously, these cities were mostly dominated by Greek speaking peoples of the Empire.

So what would happen in the event of a serious uprising or invasion? How would these satraps with reduced resources cope in such a scenario? Realising that the Royal Army would not always be able to react in time if it were solely reliant upon the figure of the Emperor for command, Alexander V provided two solutions. The first was the use of large staging points outside the main centre of the Empire that could garrison large forces and be commanded by loyal generals. This involved the creation of large forts in Anatolia, Media, Arachosia, Syria, Argead Arabia, and Argead India. The second was to create a figure that could act as a mega satrap, similar to the Roman technique of appointing a proconsul. This mega satrap acted as the Emperor, for the Emperor, usually in the group of satrapies considered most in need of administrative attention or at risk of invasion, and the area of this mega satrap’s responsibility would shift by generation, decade, and sometimes year to year. But who to trust with such responsibility? The only solution as Alexander V saw it was that the Crown Prince should be mega satrap; the assumption was that loyalty to one’s own blood would be absolute. It also acted as training for the Crown Prince, though his responsibilities upon becoming Emperor would obviously be magnified. As such, the first mega satrap was Alexander V’s chosen successor, his son Phillip.

Access to the Argead Emperor

vergina_sun_history-of-macedoniacom.jpg


As with all Empires, it was a matter of prime importance to control who could speak to the Emperor and when. Naturally, client-kings, allied states, satraps, and generals had unparalleled access to the Argead Emperor. But the Argead Empire also distinguished based upon merit, in a very specific way.

Alexander IV had begun the practice of recognising certain cultures within the Empire as having performed service to the Empire. The first culture to be awarded with this was the Persians, for safeguarding him during his vulnerable childhood. But this was not simply a case of a decree, a statue, and back-slapping; this conferred on all Persians the same access to the Emperor that Macedonians or Hellenes had. This was a policy that encouraged existing bonds in the communities under the Empire’s control, but directed to the service of the Emperor. The next of these awards was given to the Arabs, though this was as much a sabre rattle to remind Ptolemy that Arabia was a contested area as it was administration. This process initially was used to recognise extraordinary service, of many kinds, though rarely commercial or related to gift giving; the Emperor could not give the impression that his favour could be bought. But in the years after Alexander V, it began to be used more and more to recognise military service.

So who guarded the Emperor? The Argeads retained Alexander III’s practice of dedicated ‘Somatophylakes’, bodyguards. But this was increased in number, as the traditional number of seven was insufficient to the safeguarding of the Argead Emperor and insufficient for the command roles they also fulfilled. This specific form of bodyguard, the bodyguard combined with general, was continued and expanded to twelve. In addition to this, a specific troop of purely Macedonian Hetairoi cavalry was created; containing only Macedonians due to their confirmed loyalties, it was to remain at the King’s side no matter where he went. Later on, this would be expanded even further by the resurrection of the Immortals. In theory of course, the entire standing army of the Argead Empire also guarded the Emperor; let us not forget that the core of the Royal Army was made up of professional soldiers, not levies. At the height of the Empire’s internal stability, this army was a tool to keep peace in the many nations of the Empire, to defend the Empire and its allies, and to act as the arm of the Emperor himself.

End of Author B
 
Last edited:
this TL is perfect. nuff said.

I would personally like to here in more detail about what became of the Galatian incursions into Greece, as well as what happened in Italy without Pyrrhus
 
I have a map done for the Argead World post 276 BCE, however I am unable to get it to co-operate and zoom in closely enough for people to see it properly. It's a shame because it's a really pretty blank map that I have for it.
This map is exactly the period you are writing about. From the book From Samarkhand to Sardis: a new approach to the Seleucid Empire Av Susan M. Sherwin-White,Amélie Kuhrt
It's not perfect though (there is no Europe and India for instance).
But any map will make any TL better.

It's a great TL. Great illustrations!

 
Daeres, this is my version of your TL empire.

If I was inattentive and made some mistakes, please let me know - I will correct it. :)

111113 TL Alexander alive3.jpg
 
Top