Well what's that red one in Western "NY"?
Iroquois...
Well what's that red one in Western "NY"?
Well what's that red one in Western "NY"?
Indeed. They are the Iroquois. You see, when the Union fell apart, they took their chance and declared independence. Right now, they are enjoying the fruits of an alliance with Britain, which is why the Rump US hasn't brought the hammer down on them.Iroquois...
Quite.I think that the Mods may be pissed over the resurection of a 4 year old thread
That sounds like quite a good idea for a TL. Too often the failed-constitutional-convention idea seems to assume that America will stay forever separated, ignoring the fact that the shared language, heritage and interests might well re-spark unionism when 19th century nationalism comes along.
That sounds like quite a good idea for a TL. Too often the failed-constitutional-convention idea seems to assume that America will stay forever separated, ignoring the fact that the shared language, heritage and interests might well re-spark unionism when 19th century nationalism comes along.
Quite.
Theseus: You are new here, but you should know that replying to very old threads (resurrecting them from the dead; necromancy) is strongly discouraged on this site.
I believe the generally accepted practice is to create a new thread, with a link to the old one, and then make your comments in that new thread.
"Old" being defined as ... hmmm... 6 months to a year, probably. Anything older than a year is definitely too old.
The exception to this being threads you created yourself. My TL, for instance has had gaps of over a year between times I was able to constructively add anything, and that's OK.
Because it's been dead for years.May I ask what the reason behind this is?
That sounds like quite a good idea for a TL. Too often the failed-constitutional-convention idea seems to assume that America will stay forever separated, ignoring the fact that the shared language, heritage and interests might well re-spark unionism when 19th century nationalism comes along.
Quite.
Theseus: You are new here, but you should know that replying to very old threads (resurrecting them from the dead; necromancy) is strongly discouraged on this site.
I believe the generally accepted practice is to create a new thread, with a link to the old one, and then make your comments in that new thread.
"Old" being defined as ... hmmm... 6 months to a year, probably. Anything older than a year is definitely too old.
The exception to this being threads you created yourself. My TL, for instance has had gaps of over a year between times I was able to constructively add anything, and that's OK.
May I ask what the reason behind this is?