Grey Wolf
Donor
The US Radical Party
OK, I've been wandering around all the links attached to
http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/Quad/6460/dir/844nra.html
as an example
and
http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h343.html
as another example
And I am coming to the conclusion that trying to find a way of manipulating OTL political events into a new shape simply won't happen. As Clay and Van Buren both feared, the annexation of Texas, the subsequent Mexican War and the new territories all completely changed the political map. Before the mid 1840s abolitionism is one strand of political thought, afterwards it begins to dominate in many more areas.
If it had remained minor, then what would have grown up instead in opposition to a different style of Democratic regime ? One where the slavery issue is settled according to Douglas' inclinations, where the absence of many potential new slave states has made the issue more mute. Of course, there is still Kansas but that is approached from a different perspective without the other territories and Texas existing as parts of the Union
What seems to me to be more of a potential opposing force are the various working mens' parties and organisations around in this period, most of which I had never heard of until I went exploring. From out of their coalescing forms, and with more left-wing Whigs (if that modern usage makes sense here) could be formed a new party aimed at the working man and addressing his concerns.
One could counter, of course, with the claim that both main parties aim to improve the lot of the working man, but that is along the lines of saying that today's Conservative Party does so - i.e. they intend for the working man to benefit from what they do to the rest of the nation, but are not focusing on their concerns and fears.
Thus, the nascent workers' parties and movements in the USA could quite possibly copy the Radicals in the UK. After all, the name Whig was in OTL coined from the party in the UK which was historically opposed to autocratic monarchical rule. In the ATL this would be even more the case as the year of the US Whig Party's formation, 1834, is occurring slap bang in the middle of the British Civil War. One could therefore imagine that various parties have come into being with names which have been affected by the Reformists and Radicals in the UK, rather than taking on more purely-American names.
Thus by the late 1850s there may well be a US Radical Party, and after the election defeat of the Whigs in 1860 this working men's party coalesces with the aforementioned splintering of the Whigs to form a national force as the Radical Party.
Grey Wolf
OK, I've been wandering around all the links attached to
http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/Quad/6460/dir/844nra.html
as an example
and
http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h343.html
as another example
And I am coming to the conclusion that trying to find a way of manipulating OTL political events into a new shape simply won't happen. As Clay and Van Buren both feared, the annexation of Texas, the subsequent Mexican War and the new territories all completely changed the political map. Before the mid 1840s abolitionism is one strand of political thought, afterwards it begins to dominate in many more areas.
If it had remained minor, then what would have grown up instead in opposition to a different style of Democratic regime ? One where the slavery issue is settled according to Douglas' inclinations, where the absence of many potential new slave states has made the issue more mute. Of course, there is still Kansas but that is approached from a different perspective without the other territories and Texas existing as parts of the Union
What seems to me to be more of a potential opposing force are the various working mens' parties and organisations around in this period, most of which I had never heard of until I went exploring. From out of their coalescing forms, and with more left-wing Whigs (if that modern usage makes sense here) could be formed a new party aimed at the working man and addressing his concerns.
One could counter, of course, with the claim that both main parties aim to improve the lot of the working man, but that is along the lines of saying that today's Conservative Party does so - i.e. they intend for the working man to benefit from what they do to the rest of the nation, but are not focusing on their concerns and fears.
Thus, the nascent workers' parties and movements in the USA could quite possibly copy the Radicals in the UK. After all, the name Whig was in OTL coined from the party in the UK which was historically opposed to autocratic monarchical rule. In the ATL this would be even more the case as the year of the US Whig Party's formation, 1834, is occurring slap bang in the middle of the British Civil War. One could therefore imagine that various parties have come into being with names which have been affected by the Reformists and Radicals in the UK, rather than taking on more purely-American names.
Thus by the late 1850s there may well be a US Radical Party, and after the election defeat of the Whigs in 1860 this working men's party coalesces with the aforementioned splintering of the Whigs to form a national force as the Radical Party.
Grey Wolf