Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- pods:aircraft [2015/12/05 08:40] – [General musings] Petike
+++ pods:aircraft [2021/02/14 17:31] – [General musings] petike
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=206325|Plausibility check: Airship galleys ?]]**
+**[[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/the-aerial-steam-carriage-flys-abound-1850ish.353674/|The Stringfellow and Henson Aerial Steam Carriage flies around 1850-ish]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=257395|What is the earliest an airship could be built ?]]**
@@ Line 25: / Line 27: @@
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=151650|WI the test flight of the Flyer at Kitty Hawk is not successful ?]]**
+**[[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/could-the-invention-of-heavier-than-flight-be-delayed.432176/|Could the invention of heavier than flight be delayed ?]]**
+**[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/ahc-delay-aviation-by-50-years.277065/|Challenge: Delay aviation by 50 years]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=28312|Musings on the military applications of zeppelins]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=257456|How big can airplanes get ?]]**
+**[[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/what-would-early-1900s-aeroplanes-sound-like-if-they-were-powered-by-electric-engines.505210/|What would early 1900s aeroplanes sound like if they were powered by electric engines ?]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=345703|No Italo-Turkish War of 1911]]**
@@ Line 47: / Line 55: @@
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=325891|Alternatives to Heathrow Airport]]**
+**[[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/wi-bessie-coleman-doesnt-die-in-1926.411115/|WI Bessie Coleman doesn't die in 1926 ?]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=274987|WI no Air Mail Scandal of 1930 ?]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=290066|Alternate Aircraft Acquisitions]]**
+**[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/wi-1930s-1940s-alternate-military-aircraft.390213/|1930s-1940s alternate military aircraft]]**
+**[[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/ahc-1930s-40s-airforce-on-a-budget.435531/|Challenge: 1930s/1940s air force on a budget]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=123692|Alternative British fighter development in the 1930s]]**
@@ Line 71: / Line 85: @@
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=265381|Most sophisticated WWII biplane fighter possible]]**
+**[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/wi-hawker-henley-as-a-viable-combat-aircraft.400872/|WI: Hawker Henley as a viable combat aircraft ?]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=265618|Effect on the LW if the RAF does better in the Battle of Britain]]**
@@ Line 79: / Line 95: @@
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=93020|More twin-boom aircraft (like the P-38 Lightning)]]**
+**[[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/no-jets.92485/|No jets]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=269748|Challenge: Pulse jet powered fighters in WWII]]**
@@ Line 85: / Line 103: @@
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=315551|No Rolls Royce Nene engines sent accidentally to the USSR during WWII ?]]**
+**[[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/wi-no-rolls-royce-jet-engines-for-the-ussr.443298/|WI: No Rolls-Royce Jet Engines for the USSR]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=268715|Plausibility check: WWII British jet bombers]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=325652|Plausibility check: Effective Germans SAMs by January 1944 ?]]**
+**[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/what-if-the-war-began-in-1944-royal-navy-in-particular-and-raf-overall.399478/|What if the War began in 1944? (Royal Navy in particular and RAF overall)]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=124651|1946: Build your own air force]]**
@@ Line 107: / Line 129: @@
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=168502|Civilian jetliners of alternate history]]**
+**[[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/transport-autogyro-a-question-for-the-panel.436125/|Plausibility check: Transport autogyros]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=371710|Challenge: British strategic bomber]]**
+**[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/great-britain-missed-aerospace-opportunities.367215/|UK missed aerospace opportunities]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=308592|WI the German air force does not try to take the VTOL route in the 1950s/1960s]]**
@@ Line 121: / Line 147: @@
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=170998|Challenge: Commercially Successful SST]]**
+**[[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/ahc-majority-sst-air-transport-with-1970s-oil-crises.417253/|Challenge: Majority-SST air transport with 1970s oil crises]]**
 **[[http://alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=334408|Challenge: Pan Am Supersonic Transports and Space Clippers]]**
@@ Line 159: / Line 187: @@
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=206822|Aircraft developments if the first world war had dragged on a year or two longer]]**
+**[[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/sopwith-survives.315841/|Sopwith survives !]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=258845|Twin hull flying boat designs]]**
@@ Line 173: / Line 203: @@
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=246246|Airplanes with different engines and parts]]**
+**[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=383962|Challenge: Replace the Bristol Blenheim much earlier]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=268393|He 111 given more production capacity in 1939]]**
@@ Line 253: / Line 285: @@
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=335105|WI: B-70 Valkyrie enters Service]]**
+**[[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/wi-f-108-rapier-enters-service.317374/|WI: F-108 Rapier enters service]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=304941|Challenge and WI: The Dornier Do 31 enters serial production]]**
@@ Line 286: / Line 320: @@
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=52143|WI the F-16 Falcon lost in the contract bid of 1974 ?]]**
-**[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=86735|WI: F-16 cancelled]]**
+**[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=86735|WI: F-16 cancelled (1)]]**
+**[[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/wi-f-16-is-cancelled.426616/|WI: F-16 cancelled (2)]]**
+**[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=373572|WI: No F-16 Exports]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=337846|Non-US designed Aircraft in servive with the USAF/USN/USMC]]**
@@ Line 298: / Line 336: @@
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=306062|Challenge: F-18L more popular]]**
-**[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?p=6818964|Musings on a Bell Boeing V-22]]**
+**[[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/1/post-6818964|Musings on a Bell Boeing V-22]]**
 **[[http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=358463|No MV22 Osprey]]**
@@ Line 356: / Line 394: @@
 **[[pods:scientific discoveries and inventions|Scientific Discoveries and Inventions PODs Main Directory]]**
-**[[pods/pods|Points of Divergence Main Directory]]**
+**[[pods:pods|Points of Divergence Main Directory]]**