I don't think it's a viable strategy for the CSA. From the start the Confederates wanted to set up a legitimate nation, that would be accepted by the family of nations. If you mean starting out with a Peoples War Strategy, that would be an acknowledgement of the failure of independence. As Union Forces captured cities the heart would go out of the rebellion. The experience of Border States supports this thesis. Delaware, and Maryland had almost no guerilla warfare, and Missouri, and Kentucky never had enough to seriously threaten Union Control of those States. It was conventional invasions of Kentucky that posed a problem. Pro-Confederate Kentuckians mostly joined regular army units.
The base of Southern support was never that strong, nearly half the population of the South didn't believe in succession. The hill, and mountain regions, that were best suited for irregular warfare was were support for succession was weakest. How many of the Southern Officers who resigned from the U.S. Army would head south to led guerilla bands? Their training, and inclinations were deeply rooted in the doctrine of conventional warfare.
Lincoln's policy was that the Union was never dissolved, life would just go on as normal for most people, even slavery would still continue, so what are the planters fighting for? That's just what happened in the Border States that stayed in the Union. Raiders disturbing the economy, and causing loss of life would turn the population against them. A sabotage campaign would only serve to hurt their own people. The ACW would be reduced to a bandit war, like the raiders, and bank robbers of the postwar years.
Finally with the Union effectively running the Southern Economy cotton would still be exported to Europe, taking away the King Cotton Weapon, (If it ever existed) from the CSA. The reaction of the socially conservative British, and French to a fratricidal war wouldn't be positive for the Southern Cause. In fact they would be appalled, at the breakdown of law & order that would endanger their interests in the Cotton Trade. Just what would they be recognizing? Bandit leaders?
If you mean a hybrid war like the War of the American Revolution they did that. The Confederate Cavalry operated quite successfully against Union lines of communications, even raiding into Union States. Lack of resources, and the need to maintain conventional armies to defend strategic areas limited the extent of these kind of operations. Unlike the British in the ARW the Union was able to garrison Southern Population Centers, effectively controlling militia activities. Spying was rife on both sides, and helped both conduct operations.
So I don't see an insurgency strategy working for the CSA. The psychology of the South simply wouldn't support the kind of terrorist tactics of modern insurgencies, or even a kind of Spanish National Guerilla War of the Napoleonic Invasion. Jefferson Davis was no Mao, and Robert E Lee was no Lin Biao.